Debating and Education: Epistemologies, Methods, and Ethical-Educational Implications
Keywords:
Competitive debate, Epistemic responsibility, Democratic educationAbstract
This paper constitutes the call for papers for a special issue of Formazione & insegnamento (ISSN 2279-7505). It serves as a placeholder and as the first version of record for the editorial. We invite all Authors to cite this journal entry in the bibliography of their full papers. Once the issue is ready, it will be replaced by the final version of the editorial, which will expand on the current text. Please see the full text (below) for all details.
References
Ajello, A. M. (2023). Debate e dintorni: Quando si realizzano convergenze tra diverse prospettive. RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 9–15. https://ricercazione.iprase.tn.it/article/view/383
Al-Sharafi, A. G., Khader, M. M., Ahmed, M., Al-Sioufy, M. H., Zaghouani, W., & Al-Zawqari, A. (2025). A hybrid annotation model for Arabic argumentative debate corpus. In B. Hdioud & S. L. Aouragh (Eds.), Arabic language processing: From theory to practice: 8th International Conference, ICALP 2023, Rabat, Morocco, April 19–20, 2024, proceedings, Part I (pp. 97–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79164-2_9
Ang, R. X., Chew, Q., Sum, M. Y., Sengupta, S., & Sim, K. (2019). Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education: Does it work? GMS Journal for Medical Education, 36(4), Article Doc40. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001256
Aristotele. (2003). Organon: Topici (G. Colli, Trans.). Adelphi.
Bartanen, M. D., & Littlefield, R. S. (2015). Competitive speech and debate: How play influenced American educational practice. American Journal of Play, 7(2), 155–173. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053419
Camarda, R. (2024). La metodologia del debate per l’educazione civica [Doctoral dissertation, Sapienza Università di Roma]. https://iris.uniroma1.it/retrieve/8c56b579-77e7-4107-abeb-0edd22003abc/Tesi_dottorato_Camarda.pdf
Camarda, R., & Di Bono, A. (2024). Il debate per l’educazione civica: Percorsi di apprendimento per la competenza globale nella scuola secondaria. Loescher.
Cinganotto, L., Mosa, E., & Panzavolta, S. (Eds.). (2021). Il debate: Una metodologia per potenziare le competenze chiave. Carocci.
De Conti, M. (2013). Il dibattito regolamentato come metodo per acquisire competenze di gestione dei conflitti nella scuola. Formazione & Insegnamento, 11(3), 143–152. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/430
De Conti, M. (2019). Using debate in university lectures. Form@re - Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 19(1), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-24533
De Conti, M. (2024). Le epistemologie personali dei partecipanti alle pratiche di debate. In A. Gramigna & R. Minello (Eds.), Le emergenze nella formazione: L’innovazione della ricerca educativa, i drammi del presente e le sue risorse (pp. 333–340). Pensa MultiMedia.
De Conti, M. (2025a). Debate 4.0: Come l’AI trasforma la didattica. Educare.it, 25(8), 5–12. https://www.educare.it/j/temi/scuola/dibattito-a-scuola/4434-debate-4-0-come-ai-trasforma-la-didattica
De Conti, M. (2025b). Debate: Ontological, educational, and pedagogical perspectives. Salesianum, 87(4), 662–687. https://doi.org/10.63343/fw9308hi
De Conti, M., & Giangrande, M. (2017). Debate: Pratica, teoria e pedagogia. Pearson.
De Conti, M., & Manzini, R. (2024). The contribution of debate to faculty development: The Italian case study of the Faculty of Engineering at Cattaneo University. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Conference of SEFI. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14256787
De Conti, M., & Zompetti, J. (2019). L’etica del debate. Pearson.
Dewey, J. (2018). Democrazia e educazione: Una introduzione alla filosofia dell’educazione. Anicia.
Dewey, J. (2019). Come pensiamo: Una riformulazione del rapporto fra il pensiero riflessivo e l’educazione. Raffaello Cortina.
Feyerabend, P. K. (2024). Contro il metodo. Feltrinelli.
Giangrande, M. (2021). Cosa il competitive debate può apprendere dalle critiche umanistiche alla disputatio. Educazione: Giornale di pedagogia critica, 10(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.14668/Educaz_10103
Giangrande, M. (2023). Debate disciplinare per l’insegnamento della filosofia in Italia. In A. Arsena & S. Greco (Eds.), Pratiche di insegnamento-apprendimento della filosofia: Dagli Orientamenti alla didattica per competenze (pp. 113–158). IUL Press.
Giangrande, M. (2025a). Does generative artificial intelligence render the debate-based teaching methodology obsolete? Formazione & Insegnamento, 23(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXIII-01-25_06
Giangrande, M. (2025b). Storia della pratica della disputa in età moderna. Salesianum, 87(4), 732–763. https://doi.org/10.63343/bn7251sl
Gramigna, A. (2021). La fabbrica delle idee: A proposito di educazione e intelligenza. Biblion.
Haapala, T. (2016). Political rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35128-5
Hill, B. (2021). It’s good to talk: Speaking up for oracy in the management classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), Article 100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100462
Holzer, A., Tintarev, N., Bendahan, S., Kocher, B., Greenup, S., & Gillet, D. (2018). Digitally scaffolding debate in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188499
Inoue, N. (2023). Fino a che punto possiamo spingerci nel dibattito assistito dal computer? RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.32076/RA15303
Ko, T. M., & Mezuk, B. (2021). Debate participation and academic achievement among high school students in the Houston Independent School District: 2012–2015. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(6), 219–225. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1302954
Leone, M. (2023). Natura e valore del debate ad uso di chi lo pratica / Nature and value of debate for the use of those who practice it. RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.32076/RA15305
Llano, S. M. (2023). Practices of navigation: Does debate teach skills? / Pratiche di navigazione: Il debate insegna abilità? RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.32076/RA15308
Lopes, G. A. H., Deschamps, L. R., Spiess, M., & Mattedi, M. (2023). Por que estou aprendendo isso? Debate competitivo como prática pedagógica. Revista Metodologias e Aprendizado, 6. https://doi.org/10.21166/metapre.v6i.4134
Mamberti, J. (2025). Inequality and discrimination based on gender at the World Universities Debating Championships in Spanish. Argumentation and Advocacy, 61(2), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2025.2463178
Monaldi, G. (2025). Lavorare sull’oralità: Competenze degli studenti e professionalità dei docenti: Il modello LDB come strategia didattica [Doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Macerata]. https://tesidottorato.depositolegale.it/handle/20.500.14242/214244
Mosa, E., Panzavolta, S., & Tosolini, A. (2025, March 12). Debate e pace: Promuovere il dialogo democratico a scuola [Workshop]. Didacta Italia 2025. https://fieradidacta.indire.it/eventi_2025/debate-e-pace-promuovere-il-dialogo-democratico-a-scuola
Novikoff, A. J. (2013). The medieval culture of disputation: Pedagogy, practice, and performance. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Panama World Universities Debating Championship 2025. (2025). WUDC 2025. Retrieved August 2, 2025, from https://wudc2025.calicotab.com/open
Panofsky, E. (1986). Architettura gotica e filosofia scolastica (F. Starace, Trans. & Ed.). Liguori.
Park, R. J. (1987). Muscle, mind and “agon”: Intercollegiate debating and athletics at Harvard and Yale, 1892–1909. Journal of Sport History, 14(3), 263–285.
Perillo, G. (2025). Il dibattito strutturato: Epoca antica e medievale. Salesianum, 87(4), 702–731. https://doi.org/10.63343/wb6969dv
QatarDebate. (2022). QatarDebate Fellowship Program. Retrieved August 2, 2025, from https://qatardebate.org/programs/academic-programs/qdfellowship
Refrigeri, L., & Russo, N. (2020). Learning to debate in primary school. Formazione & Insegnamento, 18(1, Tome I), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XVIII-01-20_28
Rescher, N. (1977). Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. State University of New York Press.
Rescher, N. (2007). Dialectics: A classical approach to inquiry. De Gruyter.
Rogers, J. E., Freeman, N. P., & Rennels, A. R. (2017). Where are they now(?): Two decades of longitudinal outcome assessment data linking positive student, graduate student, career and life trajectory decisions to participation in intercollegiate competitive debate. National Forensic Journal, 35(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.56816/0749-1042.1029
Russo, N. (2021). (Re)train teachers and students through debate. Formazione & Insegnamento, 19(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XIX-02-21_14
Sellami, A., Michaleczek, I. J., & Karnichi, F. (2025, May 19–20). Classroom debates as a pedagogical tool: Assessing effectiveness and learning outcomes in higher education institutions: A study of selected Gulf and North African universities [Conference paper]. 2nd International Conference on Debate and Dialogue, QatarDebate.
Tamanini, C. (2023). Il debate: Valenze, criticità e prospettive. RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 23–34. https://ricercazione.iprase.tn.it/article/view/384
Zompetti, J. (2023). Exploring debate skills as practical techniques to salvage the demos. RicercAzione, 15(2 bis), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.32076/RA15310
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manuele De Conti, Matteo Giangrande
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Formazione & insegnamento is distributed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
For further details, please refer to our Repository & Archiving Policy, as well as our Copyright & Licensing Terms.
