Desde el enfoque ecológico dinámico hasta la flexibilidad del aprendizaje en la formación motora y deportiva del joven atleta

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_18

Palabras clave:

Enfoque ecológico-dinámico, Transferencia, Affordance, Asequibilidad, Aprendizaje motor, Joven atleta

Resumen

Este estudio tiene como objetivo abrir un debate sobre el tema del aprendizaje motor y el aprendizaje transferible. El aprendizaje motor cualitativo insta al uso de modelos didácticos basados en evidencias y buenas prácticas generalizables. El modelo de estilos de enseñanza en el ámbito de la educación motora y deportiva requiere un análisis cuidadoso de los marcos teóricos dentro de los cuales implementar un proceso didáctico efectivo. El objetivo de este estudio es desglosar los supuestos metodológicos del enfoque ecológico dinámico hacia el aprendizaje en orientaciones didácticas claras para la estructuración de entornos de aprendizaje que sean funcionales para la adquisición de habilidades motoras y deportivas, flexibles y no rígidas, vinculadas a la experiencia de aprendizaje en sí. Por estas razones, se llevó a cabo un análisis de la literatura más reciente, destacando las contribuciones más significativas dentro del debate actual.

Citas

Aliberti, S. (2022). A comparison between ecological-dynamic and cognitive approach to improve accuracy in basketball shot. Studia Sportiva, 16(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.5817/StS2022-1-1

Araújo, D., Hristovski, R., Seifert, L., Carvalho, J., & Davids, K. (2019). Ecological cognition: Expert decision-making behaviour in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1349826

Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). The Application of the Teaching Games for Understanding in Physical Education. Systematic Review of the Last Six Years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330

Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The Coordination and Regulations of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Bosch, F. (2010). Strength training and coordination: An integrative approach. Uitgevers.

Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear Learning Underpinning Pedagogy: Evidence, Challenges, and Implications. Quest, 65(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.807746

Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Nonlinear pedagogy: Learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.10.001

Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., & Seifert, L. (2021). The Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Supporting the Design of Modified Games in Junior Sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744814

Colella, D. (2019). Insegnamento e apprendimento delle competenze motorie. Processi e Relazioni. Formazione & insegnamento, 17(3 Suppl.), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XVII-03-19_07

Colella, D., & D’Arando, C. (2021). Teaching styles and outdoor education to promote non-linear learning. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(1), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s1054

Côté, J., & Hancock, D. J. (2016). Evidence-based policies for youth sport programmes. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.919338

Davids, K., Otte, F., & Rothwell, M. (2021). Adopting an ecological perspective on skill performance and learning in sport. European Journal of Human Movement, 46(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2021.46.667

D’Isanto, T., Altavilla, G., Esposito, G., D’Elia, F., & Raiola, G. (2022). Apprendimento euristico e sport: Linee teoriche e proposte operative. Encyclopaideia, 69-80 Paginazione. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/14237

Fajen, B. R. (2007). Affordance-Based Control of Visually Guided Action. Ecological Psychology, 19(4), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701557877

Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gray, R. (2018). Comparing cueing and constraints interventions for increasing launch angle in baseball batting. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000131

Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001

Krause, L., Farrow, D., Reid, M., Buszard, T., & Pinder, R. (2018). Helping coaches apply the principles of representative learning design: Validation of a tennis specific practice assessment tool. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(11), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1374684

Invernizzi, P. L., Rigon, M., Signorini, G., Colella, D., Trecroci, A., Formenti, D., & Scurati, R. (2022). Effects of Varied Practice Approach in Physical Education Teaching on Inhibitory Control and Reaction Time in Preadolescents. Sustainability, 14(11), 6455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116455

Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. The MIT Press.

Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching physical education. Spectrum Institute for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://spectrumofteachingstyles.org/assets/files/book/Teaching_Physical_Edu_1st_Online.pdf

Napier, C., Cochrane, C. K., Taunton, J. E., & Hunt, M. A. (2015). Gait modifications to change lower extremity gait biomechanics in runners: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(21), 1382–1388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094393

Orth, D., Van Der Kamp, J., Memmert, D., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2017). Creative Motor Actions As Emerging from Movement Variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01903

Otte, F. W., Davids, K., Millar, S-K., & Klatt, S. (2021). Understanding how athletes learn: Integrating skill training concepts, theory and practice from an ecological perspective. Applied Coaching Research Journal, 7, 22–32. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://www.ukcoaching.org/getattachment/Resources/Topics/Research/Applied-Coaching-Research-Journal-April-2021/Research-Journal-Vol-7-Understanding-How-Athletes-Learn.pdf?lang=en-GB

Pesce, C., Marchetti, R., Motta, A., & Bellucci, M. (2015). Joy of moving: Movimento e immaginazione. Perugia: Calzetti Mariucci.

Ranganathan, R., Lee, M.-H., & Newell, K. M. (2020). Repetition Without Repetition: Challenges in Understanding Behavioral Flexibility in Motor Skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02018

Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Araújo, D., Lucas, A., Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Franks, B. (2019). Evaluating Weaknesses of “Perceptual-Cognitive Training” and “Brain Training” Methods in Sport: An Ecological Dynamics Critique. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02468

Renshaw, I., Davids, K., O’Sullivan, M., Maloney, M. A., Crowther, R., & McCosker, C. (2022). An ecological dynamics approach to motor learning in practice: Reframing the learning and performing relationship in high performance sport. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.04.003

Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Silva, P., Coutinho, P., Barreira, D., & Garganta, J. (2021). Talent Development in Sport Requires Athlete Enrichment: Contemporary Insights from a Nonlinear Pedagogy and the Athletic Skills Model. Sports Medicine, 51(6), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01437-6

Rudd, J., Renshaw, I., Savelsbergh, G., Chow, J. Y., Roberts, W., Newcombe, D., & Davids, K. (2021). Nonlinear pedagogy and the athletics skills model: The importance of play in supporting physical literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025375

Sannicandro, I. (2019). Small-Sided Games configuration pitch and external motor load relationship in young soccer players: Narrative literature review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(S5), 1989–1993. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s5296

Sannicandro, I. (2022). From Traditional Approach to Ecological Dynamics Approach with the Italian Young Soccer Players. Advances in Physical Education, 12(03), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2022.123016

Scharfen, H.-E., & Memmert, D. (2019). The Relationship Between Cognitive Functions and Sport-Specific Motor Skills in Elite Youth Soccer Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00817

Schöllhorn, W. I., Rizzi, N., Slapšinskaitė-Dackevičienė, A., & Leite, N. (2022). Always Pay Attention to Which Model of Motor Learning You Are Using. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020711

Seifert, L., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2013). Key Properties of Expert Movement Systems in Sport: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective. Sports Medicine, 43(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0011-z

Seifert, L., Komar, J., Barbosa, T., Toussaint, H., Millet, G., & Davids, K. (2014). Coordination Pattern Variability Provides Functional Adaptations to Constraints in Swimming Performance. Sports Medicine, 44(10), 1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0210-x

Seifert, L., & Davids, K. (2017). Ecological Dynamics: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Sport Performance, Physical Education and Physical Activity. In P. Bourgine, P. Collet, & P. Parrend (Eds.), First Complex Systems Digital Campus World E-Conference 2015 (pp. 29–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45901-1_3

Sgrò, F., Quinto, A., Platania, F., & Lipoma, M. (n.d.). Assessing the impact of a physical education project based on games approach on the actual motor competence of primary school children. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(3), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.

Stodden, D., Lakes, K. D., Côté, J., Aadland, E., Brian, A., Draper, C. E., Ekkekakis, P., Fumagalli, G., Laukkanen, A., Mavilidi, M. F., Mazzoli, E., Neville, R. D., Niemistö, D., Rudd, J., Sääkslahti, A., Schmidt, M., Tomporowski, P. D., Tortella, P., Vazou, S., & Pesce, C. (2021). Exploration: An overarching focus for holistic development. Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior, 15(5), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v15i5.254

Smith, L. E. (1973). Specifcity versus generality of relationships between individual differences in motor abilities. Educ Perspect., 12(3), 19–28. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ087239

Wallis, R., Elliott, B., & Koh, M. (2002). The effect of a fast bowling harness in cricket: An intervention study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(6), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410252925161

Woods, C. T., McKeown, I., Rothwell, M., Araújo, D., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2020). Sport Practitioners as Sport Ecology Designers: How Ecological Dynamics Has Progressively Changed Perceptions of Skill “Acquisition” in the Sporting Habitat. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00654

Woods, C. T., Rothwell, M., Rudd, J., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2021). Representative co-design: Utilising a source of experiential knowledge for athlete development and performance preparation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101804

Woods, C. T., Rudd, J., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2020). Wayfinding: How Ecological Perspectives of Navigating Dynamic Environments Can Enrich Our Understanding of the Learner and the Learning Process in Sport. Sports Medicine - Open, 6(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00280-9

Publicado

2023-08-31

Cómo citar

Sannicandro, I., & Colella, D. (2023). Desde el enfoque ecológico dinámico hasta la flexibilidad del aprendizaje en la formación motora y deportiva del joven atleta. Formazione & Insegnamento, 21(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_18

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a