Dall'approccio ecologico dinamico alla flessibilità degli apprendimenti nella formazione motoria e sportiva del giovane atleta

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_18

Palavras-chave:

Approccio ecologico-dinamico, Trasferibilità, Opportunità, Apprendimento motorio, Giovane atleta

Resumo

Questo studio si prefigge di aprire un dibattito sul tema dell’apprendimento motorio e dell’apprendimento trasferibile. L’apprendimento motorio qualitativo sollecita il ricorso a modelli didattici basati sulle evidenze e a buone pratiche generalizzabili. Il modello degli stili di insegnamento nell’ambito dell’educazione motoria e sportiva richiede un’analisi attenta dei quadri teorici all’interno dei quali attuare un efficace processo didattico. L’obiettivo di questo studio è declinare i presupposti metodologici dell’approccio ecologico dinamico all’apprendimento in chiari orientamenti didattici per la strutturazione di ambienti di apprendimento funzionali all’acquisizione di competenze motorie e sportive, flessibili e non rigide, vincolate all’esperienza di apprendimento tout court. Per tali motivi è stata condotta un’analisi della letteratura più recente, evidenziando i contributi più significativi all’interno del dibattito attuale.

Referências

Aliberti, S. (2022). A comparison between ecological-dynamic and cognitive approach to improve accuracy in basketball shot. Studia Sportiva, 16(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.5817/StS2022-1-1

Araújo, D., Hristovski, R., Seifert, L., Carvalho, J., & Davids, K. (2019). Ecological cognition: Expert decision-making behaviour in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1349826

Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). The Application of the Teaching Games for Understanding in Physical Education. Systematic Review of the Last Six Years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330

Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The Coordination and Regulations of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Bosch, F. (2010). Strength training and coordination: An integrative approach. Uitgevers.

Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear Learning Underpinning Pedagogy: Evidence, Challenges, and Implications. Quest, 65(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.807746

Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Nonlinear pedagogy: Learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.10.001

Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., & Seifert, L. (2021). The Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Supporting the Design of Modified Games in Junior Sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744814

Colella, D. (2019). Insegnamento e apprendimento delle competenze motorie. Processi e Relazioni. Formazione & insegnamento, 17(3 Suppl.), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XVII-03-19_07

Colella, D., & D’Arando, C. (2021). Teaching styles and outdoor education to promote non-linear learning. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(1), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s1054

Côté, J., & Hancock, D. J. (2016). Evidence-based policies for youth sport programmes. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.919338

Davids, K., Otte, F., & Rothwell, M. (2021). Adopting an ecological perspective on skill performance and learning in sport. European Journal of Human Movement, 46(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2021.46.667

D’Isanto, T., Altavilla, G., Esposito, G., D’Elia, F., & Raiola, G. (2022). Apprendimento euristico e sport: Linee teoriche e proposte operative. Encyclopaideia, 69-80 Paginazione. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/14237

Fajen, B. R. (2007). Affordance-Based Control of Visually Guided Action. Ecological Psychology, 19(4), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701557877

Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gray, R. (2018). Comparing cueing and constraints interventions for increasing launch angle in baseball batting. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000131

Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001

Krause, L., Farrow, D., Reid, M., Buszard, T., & Pinder, R. (2018). Helping coaches apply the principles of representative learning design: Validation of a tennis specific practice assessment tool. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(11), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1374684

Invernizzi, P. L., Rigon, M., Signorini, G., Colella, D., Trecroci, A., Formenti, D., & Scurati, R. (2022). Effects of Varied Practice Approach in Physical Education Teaching on Inhibitory Control and Reaction Time in Preadolescents. Sustainability, 14(11), 6455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116455

Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. The MIT Press.

Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching physical education. Spectrum Institute for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://spectrumofteachingstyles.org/assets/files/book/Teaching_Physical_Edu_1st_Online.pdf

Napier, C., Cochrane, C. K., Taunton, J. E., & Hunt, M. A. (2015). Gait modifications to change lower extremity gait biomechanics in runners: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(21), 1382–1388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094393

Orth, D., Van Der Kamp, J., Memmert, D., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2017). Creative Motor Actions As Emerging from Movement Variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01903

Otte, F. W., Davids, K., Millar, S-K., & Klatt, S. (2021). Understanding how athletes learn: Integrating skill training concepts, theory and practice from an ecological perspective. Applied Coaching Research Journal, 7, 22–32. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://www.ukcoaching.org/getattachment/Resources/Topics/Research/Applied-Coaching-Research-Journal-April-2021/Research-Journal-Vol-7-Understanding-How-Athletes-Learn.pdf?lang=en-GB

Pesce, C., Marchetti, R., Motta, A., & Bellucci, M. (2015). Joy of moving: Movimento e immaginazione. Perugia: Calzetti Mariucci.

Ranganathan, R., Lee, M.-H., & Newell, K. M. (2020). Repetition Without Repetition: Challenges in Understanding Behavioral Flexibility in Motor Skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02018

Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Araújo, D., Lucas, A., Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Franks, B. (2019). Evaluating Weaknesses of “Perceptual-Cognitive Training” and “Brain Training” Methods in Sport: An Ecological Dynamics Critique. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02468

Renshaw, I., Davids, K., O’Sullivan, M., Maloney, M. A., Crowther, R., & McCosker, C. (2022). An ecological dynamics approach to motor learning in practice: Reframing the learning and performing relationship in high performance sport. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2022.04.003

Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Silva, P., Coutinho, P., Barreira, D., & Garganta, J. (2021). Talent Development in Sport Requires Athlete Enrichment: Contemporary Insights from a Nonlinear Pedagogy and the Athletic Skills Model. Sports Medicine, 51(6), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01437-6

Rudd, J., Renshaw, I., Savelsbergh, G., Chow, J. Y., Roberts, W., Newcombe, D., & Davids, K. (2021). Nonlinear pedagogy and the athletics skills model: The importance of play in supporting physical literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025375

Sannicandro, I. (2019). Small-Sided Games configuration pitch and external motor load relationship in young soccer players: Narrative literature review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(S5), 1989–1993. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s5296

Sannicandro, I. (2022). From Traditional Approach to Ecological Dynamics Approach with the Italian Young Soccer Players. Advances in Physical Education, 12(03), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2022.123016

Scharfen, H.-E., & Memmert, D. (2019). The Relationship Between Cognitive Functions and Sport-Specific Motor Skills in Elite Youth Soccer Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00817

Schöllhorn, W. I., Rizzi, N., Slapšinskaitė-Dackevičienė, A., & Leite, N. (2022). Always Pay Attention to Which Model of Motor Learning You Are Using. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020711

Seifert, L., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2013). Key Properties of Expert Movement Systems in Sport: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective. Sports Medicine, 43(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0011-z

Seifert, L., Komar, J., Barbosa, T., Toussaint, H., Millet, G., & Davids, K. (2014). Coordination Pattern Variability Provides Functional Adaptations to Constraints in Swimming Performance. Sports Medicine, 44(10), 1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0210-x

Seifert, L., & Davids, K. (2017). Ecological Dynamics: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Sport Performance, Physical Education and Physical Activity. In P. Bourgine, P. Collet, & P. Parrend (Eds.), First Complex Systems Digital Campus World E-Conference 2015 (pp. 29–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45901-1_3

Sgrò, F., Quinto, A., Platania, F., & Lipoma, M. (n.d.). Assessing the impact of a physical education project based on games approach on the actual motor competence of primary school children. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(3), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.

Stodden, D., Lakes, K. D., Côté, J., Aadland, E., Brian, A., Draper, C. E., Ekkekakis, P., Fumagalli, G., Laukkanen, A., Mavilidi, M. F., Mazzoli, E., Neville, R. D., Niemistö, D., Rudd, J., Sääkslahti, A., Schmidt, M., Tomporowski, P. D., Tortella, P., Vazou, S., & Pesce, C. (2021). Exploration: An overarching focus for holistic development. Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior, 15(5), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v15i5.254

Smith, L. E. (1973). Specifcity versus generality of relationships between individual differences in motor abilities. Educ Perspect., 12(3), 19–28. Retrieved August 15, 2023, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ087239

Wallis, R., Elliott, B., & Koh, M. (2002). The effect of a fast bowling harness in cricket: An intervention study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(6), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410252925161

Woods, C. T., McKeown, I., Rothwell, M., Araújo, D., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2020). Sport Practitioners as Sport Ecology Designers: How Ecological Dynamics Has Progressively Changed Perceptions of Skill “Acquisition” in the Sporting Habitat. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00654

Woods, C. T., Rothwell, M., Rudd, J., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2021). Representative co-design: Utilising a source of experiential knowledge for athlete development and performance preparation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101804

Woods, C. T., Rudd, J., Robertson, S., & Davids, K. (2020). Wayfinding: How Ecological Perspectives of Navigating Dynamic Environments Can Enrich Our Understanding of the Learner and the Learning Process in Sport. Sports Medicine - Open, 6(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00280-9

Publicado

2023-08-31

Como Citar

Sannicandro, I., & Colella, D. (2023). Dall’approccio ecologico dinamico alla flessibilità degli apprendimenti nella formazione motoria e sportiva del giovane atleta. Formazione & Insegnamento, 21(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_18

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)