The Contribution of Generative AI Ecosystems in Micro-Instructional Design: Opportunities and Limitations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXII-01-24_13

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Pedagogical Planner, Teacher Professionalism, Design for learning

Abstract

Pedagogical Planners (PP) are digital environments specifically developed with the aim of accompanying teachers in making visible and methodologically grounded, the process of designing and implementing teaching-learning experiences. In more recent times, the integration of generative AI algorithms within PP, such as AI Lesson Planners, opens new educational challenges and unprecedented perspectives for educational research and practice. The question that remains open is, what is the emerging School idea and what teacher idea is implicated in the development of these generative AI ecosystems?  

References

Antonenko, P., Abramowitz, B. (2023). In-service teachers’ (mis)conceptions of artificial intelligence in K-12 science education, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, (55)1, 64-78, https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2119450

Baldacci, M. (2012). Trattato di pedagogia. Roma: Carocci.

Bertin, G. M. (1968). Educazione alla ragione. Roma: Armando Editore.

Bertolini, P. (1983). Pedagogia e scienze umane. Bologna: CLUEB.

Bottino M. R, Ott, M. Tavella M. (2011). Pedagogical planning and sustainability of learning actions: the Iamel system. Tecnologie Didattiche, 19(3), 147-154, https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/207

Cameron, L., & Campbell, C. (2010). Sharing learning designs that work. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive. Media in Education, 8(1) https://doi.org/10.5334/2005-8

Costa, N. Pereira Junior, C., Araujo, R., Fernandes, M. (2019). Application of AI Planning in the Context of e-Learning, IEEE Computer Society, 57-59, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2019.00021

Dalziel J. (2003). Implementing learning design: the learning activity management system (LAMS). In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, J. Baron (eds.). Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasia Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (AS-CILITE). Interact, Integrate, Impact (Adelaide, Australia, 7-10 december 2003). ASCILITE, 593-596.

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.

Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), pp.52-57. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177

Fabbri, M. (2018). Oltre il disagio. Percorsi di crisi, orizzonti di civiltà. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Ferrari, L (2015). Costruire esperienze didattiche di online collaborative learning. Parma: Junior.

Kehoe, F. (2023). Leveraging Generative AI Tools for Enhanced Lesson Planning in Initial Teacher Education at Post Primary. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 172-182, https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.124

Laurillard, D. (2014), Insegnamento come progettazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Margiotta, U. (a cura di) (2018). Teacher Education Agenda. Linee guida per la formazione iniziale dei docenti della scuola secondaria. Trento: Erickson.

Masterman, E., Manton, M. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.588414

Masterman, E., Walker, S., & Bower, M. (2013). Computational support for teachers’ design thinking: Its feasibility and acceptability to practitioners and institutions. Educational Media International, 50, 12-23. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/132440/

Miller, A. L. (2023). AI Assisted Learning: A Tool or a Threat? Journal of e-learning Research, 2(2), 52-65, https://doi.org/10.33422/jelr.v2i2.510

Mor Y., Warburton S., Winters N., Mellar H. (eds.) (2014). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology. Rotterdam: Sense.

Nerantzi, C., Abegglen, S., Karatsiori, M., Martinez-Arboleda, A. (2023). 101 Creative ideas to use AI in education. A collection curated by #creativeHE.

OECD (2010). Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy. A Systemic Approach To Technology-Based School Innovations. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Persico, D. & Pozzi, F. (2013). Sustaining Learning Design and Pedagogical Planning in CSCL. Research in Learning Technology, 21, https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17585

Pozzi, F., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Ceregini, A., Dagnino, F. M., Dimitriadis, Y., & Earp, J. (2020). Supporting and representing Learning Design with digital tools: in between guidance and flexibility. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 109-128, https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1714708

Rossi, P.G. (2014), Le tecnologie digitali per la progettazione didattica. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), [S.l.], 10, 113-133, https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-ross

Rossi, P.G. (2016). Progettazione didattica e professionalità docente. PROPIT: l’artefatto progettuale come mediatore didattico. In P.G. Rossi, C. Giaconi (a cura di). Micro-progettazione: pratiche didattiche a confronto PROPIT, EAS, Flipped Classroom. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Rivoltella P. C. (2012). Neurodidattica. Insegnare al cervello che apprende. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

San Diego, J. P., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Ljubojevic, D., Neumann, T., Pearce, D. (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. ALT-J, 16(1), 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687760701850174

Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing design to software. New York, NY: ACM Press.

Yue, M., Jong, M.S., Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical Design of K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 14, 15620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Ellerani, P., & Ferrari, L. (2024). The Contribution of Generative AI Ecosystems in Micro-Instructional Design: Opportunities and Limitations. Formazione & Insegnamento, 22(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXII-01-24_13

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>