Dalle lavagne agli schermi digitali: In che modo la tecnologia in classe influenza il comportamento accademico, l'impegno e la motivazione degli studenti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXIII-02-25_12Parole chiave:
Trasformazione digitale, Tecnologia in classe, Comportamento scolastico degli Studenti, Impegno, Motivazione, Tecnologia didatticaAbstract
Nell’era digitale, la didattica d'aula sta integrando la tecnologia a supporto di studio, collaborazione, organizzazione, partecipazione e motivazione. Questa ricerca quantitativa e descrittiva esamina il nesso tra tecnologia in classe e comportamento accademico degli studenti del decimo anno in una scuola superiore pubblica del Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. I dati sono stati raccolti con un questionario Likert a cinque opzioni sviluppato ad hoc e, successivamente, analizzati con SPSS (medie, deviazioni standard, test chi-quadrato e matrici di correlazione). I partecipanti hanno riferito che gli strumenti digitali (comprese lavagne interattive e piattaforme online) favoriscono l’apprendimento personalizzato, la collaborazione in tempo reale con i docenti e pari e l’organizzazione efficace di materiali e scadenze. Gli intervistati hanno inoltre indicato una maggiore partecipazione, motivazione e coinvolgimento. Nel complesso, i risultati suggeriscono che percorsi di apprendimento personalizzati resi possibili da tecnologia, strumenti di collaborazione e piattaforme interattive siano associati a migliori competenze di studio e organizzative e a maggiore coinvolgimento scolastico.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Carr, C. T. (2020). CMC Is Dead, Long Live CMC!: Situating Computer-Mediated Communication Scholarship Beyond the Digital Age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz018
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation: Full Report. Durham University and Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED612174
Johnson, M. (2020). Cloud computing and student productivity: A modern approach to learning organization. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v2i2.1333
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kay, R. H., Knaack, L. & Petrarca, D. (2018). Exploring student perceptions of web-based learning tools. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 1–7.
Khan, S. H., ur Rahim, Mujeeb & Naz, F. L.. (2023). Effects of Digital Technology on Mathematical Achievements of Primary School Students; Evidences From Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 2(3), 287–293. Retrieved September 4, 2025, from https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/62
Li, Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). How students’ attitudes toward internet-mediated learning resources influence their learning behaviors. Computers & Education, 68, 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.005
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of learning. The Royal Society.
Matthews, R., & Ross, E. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education Ltd.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, A. (2019). The impact of digital note-taking on student learning and organization. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09472-3
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Oxford University Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2020). Taking a qualitative approach to technology and education. In N. Selwyn (Ed.), Telling Tales on Technology (pp. 7–20). Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Digital technologies and the automation of education—Key questions and concerns. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00252-5
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y. (2021). Collaborative learning in digital education: Tools and strategies. Springer.
Warschauer, M. (2020). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media. Teachers College Press.
Yue, C., & Xu, X. (2019). Review of quantitative methods used in Chinese educational research, 1978–2018. ECNU Review of Education, 2(4), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878966
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Categorie
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Sher Alam Khan, Giorgio Poletti, Farooq Nawaz Khan
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Formazione & insegnamento è distribuita con la seguente licenza: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Per ulteriori dettagli, si rimanda alle Politiche di archiviazione e ai Termini di Copyright e Licenza.
