Proposal for a visual-semantic web CV (CVSw)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-X-03-12_11Keywords:
Curriculum, Visual-semantic, CVSw, Dynamic graph, EuropassAbstract
This article presents the proposal of a device meant for the active construction of one’s own Curriculum Vitae: the representational portrayal in a web environment, called Visual-Semantic web CV (CVSw). The leading hypothesis is that, thanks to its value for guidance and to its enhanced visual features, this apparatus allows for the elicitation of cognitive processes—and thus constitutes a useful medium able to facilitate organizational, communicative, and educational capabilities. This tool includes a progressive stepby-step processing within a virtual environment. When involved in the constructive process, the individuals are led to structure their own life experience according to three areas related to the European CV model: education/training, activities, and products. CVsw introduces two new agents of innovation: the attribution of semantic meanings and values, and userfriendly graphic display meant for both the creator and the final user.
References
Antinucci, F. (2011). Parola e Immagine: Storia di due tecnologie. Bari: Laterza.
Banzato, M. (2011). Digital Literacy: Cultura ed educazione per la società della conoscenza. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
Calvani, A. (2008). Come cambiano i processi di apprendimento con l’uso delle TIC. Puntoedu INDIRE – Formazione Docenti Neoassunti, a.s. 2007/2008. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.chersi.it/listing/neoassunti2008/5tecnologia_didat/1153.pdf
CEDEFOP. (2008). Terminology of European education and training policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/download-manager.aspx?id=13126&lang=en&type=publication
CEDEFOP. (2009). European Guidelines for validating non-formal and informal learning. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news/4041.aspx>.
De Kerckhove, D. (1993). Brainframes: mente, tecnologia, mercato. Bologna: Baskerville.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communication and Technology (p. 693-724). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
Luisi, A., & Senni, P. (Eds.). (2003). Gli strumenti per l’autovalutazione – Le griglie di repertorio. Rastignano: Temi.
Penge, S. (2005). Progettare Learning Object come attività didattica. Puntoedu INDIRE – Formazione Docenti Neoassunti, 12 aprile 2005. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://digilander.libero.it/dibiasio.neoassunti/TEMATICA6/Pensare/progettare%20LO.pdf
Pedroni, M. (2009). La mappatura dinamica della conoscenza. Il giornale dell’e-learning, 2(3). Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.wbt.it/index.php?pagina=526
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Le tavole con gli esempi di rappresentazione grafica per le pagine web sono state elaborate dal Prof. Tiziano Minatel, che ringraziamo per la sua preziosa collaborazione.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Luisa Salmaso, Silvio Bagnariol, Paolo Tosato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Formazione & insegnamento is distributed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
For further details, please refer to our Repository & Archiving Policy, as well as our Copyright & Licensing Terms.
