The Shared Duality of Self-training and Co-design of an EAS for a Resilient Transformativeness

Authors

  • Immacolata Brunetti Università degli Studi di Firenze, imma.brunetti@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XX-01-22_75

Keywords:

Self-directed learning, Smart working, Instructional designer, Trasformatività resiliente

Abstract

The theory of self-determination (SDT) is a rapidly expanding topic, which helps us to consider personal abilities regarding self-regulation and self-determination of one’s learning, as well as vulnerability to defensive and control. Within the SDT, these human abilities are studied using different methods of psychology. In this research we focus, in particular, on the capacity for autonomy in the self-training decision. On the basis of self-training, this contribution aims to reflect on the meaning of didactic co-planning shared between teachers in smart working (Alessandrini, 2016), on the action that the teacher performs during the redesign of the contents to be taught (Perla-Riva, 2016). Working with new methodologies requires a new way of rethinking oneself as a teaching professional (Rivoltella-Rossi, 2012). The cosharing of choices regarding the content, the resources available, and their skills starting from their training, highlights the figure of the teacher as a designer who redesigns his teaching project every day, moving from motivations to self-training (Knowles , 1975; Quaglino, 2014; Bochicchio, 2014).

References

Alessandrini G. (2016). Smart Working. Nuove skill e competenze. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia Editore.

Alessandrini G. (ed) (2004). Pedagogia delle risorse umane e delle organizzazioni, Milano: Guerini e Associati.

Alessandrini, G. (2013). Capacitazione e formazione. Quali prospettive? Formazione & insegnamento, 11(1), 2013, pp. 53-68.

Altet M. (2013). L’apporto dell’analisi plurale dalle pratiche didattiche alla co-formazione degli insegnanti. In P. C. Rivoltella. P. C. Rossi (Eds). L’agire didattico. Manuale per l’insegnante. Brescia: La Scuola, pp. 292-312.

Bochicchio F. (2014). Autoformazione. In G. P. Quaglino (Ed.), Formazione: I metodi (pp. 49- 68). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Bochiccio F., Rivoltella, P. C. (Eds.) (2017). L’agire organizzativo. Manuale per i professionisti della formazione. Brescia: Morcelliana.

De Toni, A., Sigari, R., & Battistella, C. (2015). Anticipare il futuro. Milano: Egea.

Giovannini, E. (2018), L’utopia sostenibile, Bari: Laterza.

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed Learning. A Guide for Learners and Teacher. New York: Prentice Hall.

Mackenzie, S. H., & Hodge, K. (2019). Adventure recreation and subjective well-being: A conceptual framework. Leisure Studies, 39(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/ 10.1080 /0261 4367.2019.1577478

Maggi, B. (2010). Teoria dell’agire organizzativo. In B. Maggi (ed). Interpretare l’agire: una sfida teorica. Roma: Carocci.

Magnoler P. (2012). Ricerca e formazione. La professionalizzazione degli insegnanti. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.

Maturana, M. H., Varela, F. J. (2001). Autopoiesi e cognizione. Venezia: Marsilio.

Mezirow, J. (2003). L’apprendimento trasformativo: Il significato dell’esperienza e il valore della riflessione nell’apprendimento degli adulti. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Ofman, D. (2007). Le qualità autentiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Pastré, P., Parage, P., Richard, J.F., Sander, E., Labat, J. M., Futtersack, M. (2009). La resolution de problems professionels sur simulateur. Activités, 6-1, http://activites.revues.org/2122

Perla, L., Riva, M. G. (Eds.) (2016). L’agire educativo. Manuale per educatori e operatori socioassistenziali. Brescia: La Scuola.

Pineau, M. (1985). L’autoformation dans le cours de la vie: entre l’etero et l’ecoformation. Education permanente, 78-79, 1985, pp. 25-39.

Quaglino, G. P. (Ed.) (2014). Formazione. I metodi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Rivoltella, P.C. (2015). Didattica inclusiva con gli EAS. Brescia: Editrice La Scuola.

Rivoltella, P.C., Rossi, P.G. (eds) (2012). L’agire didattico. Manuale per l’insegnante. Brescia: La Scuola.

Ryan, R. M., Ryan, W. S., Di Domenico, S. I., & Deci, E. L. (2019). The nature and the conditions of human autonomy and flourishing: Self-determination theory and basic psychological needs. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (2nd ed., pp. 89–110). Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190666453.013.6

Ryan, R. M., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2019). Reflections on self-determination theory as an organizing framework for personality psychology: Interfaces, integrations, issues, and unfinished business. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12440

Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (200). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 2000, 68-78.

Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162

Sen, A. (2000). Lo sviluppo e liberta. Perché non c'è crescita senza democrazia. Milano: Mondadori.

Vinatier, I. (2009). Pour une didactique professionnelle de l’enseignement. Rennes: PUR.

Weick, K, Sutcliffe, K. (2010). Governare l’inatteso. Organizzazioni capaci di affrontare le crisi con successo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.

Weinstein, N., DeHaan, C. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Attributing autono- mous versus introjected motivation to helpers and the recipient experience: Effects on gratitude, attitudes, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9183-8

Published

2022-05-30