Cosa sappiamo sull’efficacia dei programmi di potenziamento lessicale: Una sintesi delle evidenze
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_16Parole chiave:
Competenza lessicale, Sviluppo delle competenze di lettura, Strategie efficaci, Interventi lessicali, Fattori metodologici, Fattori didattici, Fattori contestuali, Sintesi della ricercaAbstract
Il potenziamento del lessico è definito come lo sviluppo della competenza lessicale, intesa come la capacità di comprendere e utilizzare parole ed espressioni di una lingua in modo appropriato. Questa competenza è indispensabile per la comprensione del testo e per lo sviluppo delle abilità di lettura. Lo studio presenta una sintesi delle evidenze [umbrella review] con un duplice obiettivo: conoscere l’efficacia di interventi sulla competenza lessicale e, più in generale, sulla competenza di lettura; valutare quali fattori metodologici, didattici e contestuali contribuiscono alla qualità e all’efficacia degli interventi. La sintesi include meta-analisi di studi sperimentali sull’effetto di interventi lessicali ed esplicita il processo di ricerca, selezione e analisi degli studi. Dalle evidenze sintetizzate, emerge che tali interventi abbiamo un’efficacia moderata sullo sviluppo della competenza lessicale e di quella di lettura, sia nella lingua madre sia nella lingua seconda, con differenze sulla base dell’età dei soggetti e della tipologia di programma.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abrami, P. C., Lysenko, L., & Borokhovski, E. (2020). The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta‐analysis and landscape review of applied field research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12417
Anderson, R., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Ardasheva, Y., Hao, T., & Zhang, X. (2019). Pedagogical implications of current SLA research for vocabulary skills. In N. Polat, P. MacIntyre, & T. Gregersen (Eds.), Research-driven pedagogy: Implications of L2A theory and research for the teaching of language skills (pp. 125–144). Routledge.
Balboni, P. E. (2014). Didattica dell’italiano come lingua seconda e straniera. Torino: Loescher.
Becker, B. J., & Aloe, A. M. (2019). Model-based meta-analysis and related approaches. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 339–363). Russell Sage Foundation.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Calvani, A., & Chiappetta Cajola, L. (Eds.). (2019). Strategie efficaci per la comprensione del testo: Il Reciprocal teaching. Firenze: SApIE Scientifica.
Chall, J. (1987). Two Vocabularies for Reading: Recognition and Meaning. McKeown and Curtis.
Chen, M. H., Tseng, W. T., & Hsiao, T. Y. (2018). The effectiveness of digital game-based vocabulary learning: A framework-based view of meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12526.
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292.
Cossu, G. (2013). TNL–Test Neuropsicologico lessicale per l’età evolutiva. Firenze: Hogrefe.
De Mauro, T. (1963). Storia linguistica dell’Italia unita. Bari: Laterza.
De Mauro, T. (2014). Storia linguistica dell’Italia repubblicana. Dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). P.P.V.T. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.
Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Passage-Level Comprehension of School-Age Children: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1-44. 10.1080/19345740802539200
Ferreri, S. (2005). L‘alfabetizzazione lessicale: studi di linguistica educativa. Roma: Aracne.
Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, S. R., Kavari, K. E., Asgari, P., & Hydarei, A. (2011). The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers’ vocabulary retention and recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.552186
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hall, C., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., McCulley, L. V., Carroll, M., & Vaughn, S. (2017). Reading instruction for English learners in the middle grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 763–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9372-4
INVALSI. (2022). Rapporto INVALSI 2022. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/2022/Rilevazioni_Nazionali/Rapporto/Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2022.pdf
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kieffer, M. J., Petscher, Y., Proctor, C. P., & Silverman, R. D. (2016). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(6), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1214591
Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical Thresholds for Reading Comprehension: What They Are and How They Can Be Used for Teaching Purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 867–872. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267941
Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53, 253–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170386
Milani, L. (1958). Esperienze pastorali. Firenze: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.
Montesano, L. (2020). Vocabolario e Comprensione del testo. Uno strumento per la valutazione del lessico nella scuola Primaria. SApIE Scientifica, Firenze.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel--Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Riccardi Ripamonti, I., Cividati, B., Russo, V., Zerbini, A. & Rossoni, I. (2014). Test VCLA-PAROLE. Valutazione delle Competenze Linguistiche Alte. Prove per l’individuazione delle abilità logico-verbali, espressive e morfologiche. Trento: Erickson.
Rodari, G. (1973). Grammatica della Fantasia. Introduzione all’arte di inventare storie. Torino: Einaudi.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman, & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
Silverman, R., Johnson, E., Keane, K., & Khanna, S. (2020). Beyond Decoding: A Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Language Comprehension Interventions on K–5 Students’ Language and Literacy Outcomes. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S207–S233. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.346
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170287
Stahl S. & Nagy W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences for the individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/747612
Thurstone, T. G., & Thurstone, L. L. (1962). P.M.A. Primary Mental Abilities. Science Research Associates.
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—WISC-IV. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wolf, B., & Harbatkin, E. (2023). Making sense of effect sizes: Systematic differences in intervention effect sizes by outcome measure type. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 16(1), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2071364
Yu, A., & Trainin, G. (2022). A meta-analysis examining technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning. ReCALL 34(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000239
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Carmen Pannone, Marta Pellegrini
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Formazione & insegnamento è distribuita con la seguente licenza: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Per ulteriori dettagli, si rimanda alle Politiche di archiviazione e ai Termini di Copyright e Licenza.
