Cooperación e inteligencia artificial: Una revisión crítica entre gobernanza, ética y democracia
Resumen
Este artículo ofrece una revisión exploratoria de las relaciones entre cooperación e inteligencia artificial (IA), analizando cómo los principios cooperativos pueden orientar el diseño, la gobernanza y el desarrollo ético de las tecnologías inteligentes. A partir de un análisis sistemático de 70 contribuciones académicas publicadas entre 2016 y 2025, el estudio identifica cuatro áreas principales de investigación: inteligencia artificial cooperativa y dilemas sociales, gobernanza cooperativa de la IA, inteligencia artificial para la cooperación ética (AI4EC) e inteligencia artificial democrática. Los resultados muestran que la cooperación proporciona un marco transversal - técnico, político y educativo - capaz de promover enfoques inclusivos, participativos y éticamente fundamentados de la transformación digital. Desde esta perspectiva, la educación no se limita a los contextos formales de enseñanza, sino que se extiende a procesos de aprendizaje colectivo, desarrollo de capacidades y conciencia sociotécnica que implican a ciudadanos, educadores y organizaciones. Al cartografiar las lagunas de investigación y las tendencias emergentes, el artículo sostiene que situar la cooperación en el centro del debate sobre la IA significa reafirmar el papel colectivo de estos actores en la construcción de tecnologías orientadas al bienestar democrático y social.
Citas
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Asa, Y., Kato, T., & Mine, R. (2023). Composite consensus-building process: Permissible meeting analysis and compromise choice exploration. In Y. Maemura, M. Horita, L. Fang, & P. Zaraté (Eds.), Group decision and negotiation in the era of multimodal interactions: GDN 2023 (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 478, pp. 97–112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33780-2_7
Benton, P. (2024). Democratic AI: Justification for a broad view of public reason. In A. Gerber, J. Maritz, & A. W. Pillay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence research: SACAIR 2024 (Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 2326, pp. 440–455). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78255-8_26
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., & Hafen, E. (2018). Democratizing health research through data cooperatives. Philosophy & Technology, 31(3), 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0320-8
Bruder, R., Stockinger, C., Petrat, D., & Subtil, I. (2021). Development of cooperative artificial intelligence (AI) applications to support human work in manufacturing. In N. L. Black, W. P. Neumann, & I. Noy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association: IEA 2021 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 221, pp. 391–397). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_49
Buckingham, D. (2019). The media education manifesto. Polity Press.
Calzati, S., & van Loenen, B. (2023). Towards a citizen- and citizenry-centric digitalization of the urban environment: Urban digital twinning as commoning. Digital Society, 2(3), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00064-0
Calzada, I. (2023). Disruptive technologies for e-diasporas: Blockchain, DAOs, data cooperatives, metaverse, and ChatGPT. Futures, 154, Article 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103258
Calzada, I. (2024a). Artificial intelligence for social innovation: Beyond the noise of algorithms and datafication. Sustainability, 16(19), Article 8638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198638
Calzada, I. (2024b). Democratic erosion of data-opolies: Decentralized Web3 technological paradigm shift amidst AI disruption. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(3), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8030026
Carballa Smichowski, B. (2019). Alternative data governance models: Moving beyond one-size-fits-all solutions. Intereconomics, 54(4), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0828-x
Cecchini, D., Pflanzer, M., & Dubljević, V. (2025). Aligning artificial intelligence with moral intuitions: An intuitionist approach to the alignment problem. AI Ethics, 5(2), 1523–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00496-5
Chen, J., Zhang, D., Qu, Z., & Wang, C. (2022). Modeling adaptive empathy based on neutral assessment: A way to enhance the prosocial behaviors of socialized agents under the premise of self-security. Applied Intelligence, 52, 6692–6722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02712-9
Cheng, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, S., & Mao, S. (2024). Towards federated large language models: Motivations, methods, and future directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 27(4), 2733–2764. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3503680
Cherner, T., Foulger, T. S., & Donnelly, M. (2025). Introducing a generative AI decision tree for higher education: A synthesis of ethical considerations from published frameworks & guidelines. TechTrends, 69(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01023-3
Cocchiaro, M. Z., Morley, J., Novelli, C., Panai, E., Tartaro, A., & Floridi, L. (2025). Who is an AI ethicist? An empirical study of expertise, skills, and profiles to build a competency framework. AI Ethics, 5(4), 3713–3725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00643-y
Cross, M. (2024). Limitations of transparency in democratising and regulating algorithmic management. In M. Ziosi, G. Sartor, J. M. Cunha, A. Trotta, & P. Wicke (Eds.), AI for people, democratizing AI: CAIP 2023 (Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 591, pp. 86–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71304-0_7
Dafoe, A., Bachrach, Y., Hadfield, G. K., Horvitz, E., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2021). Cooperative AI: Machines must learn to find common ground. Nature, 593(7857), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01170-0
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020). Open problems in cooperative AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.08630
Dasgupta, N., & Musolesi, M. (2025). Investigating the impact of direct punishment on the emergence of cooperation in multi-agent reinforcement learning systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 39(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-025-09698-5
de Souza, S., & Bhardwaj, K. (2024). India’s conception of community data and addressing concerns for access to justice. Digital Society, 3(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00102-5
Decker, M., Wegner, L., & Leicht-Scholten, C. (2025). Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: The role of public engagement. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09811-4
Dua, M., Singh, J. P., & Shehu, A. (2025). The ethics of national artificial intelligence plans: An empirical lens. AI Ethics, 5(4), 3803–3831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00663-2
Eke, D., & Stahl, B. (2024). Ethics in the governance of data and digital technology: An analysis of European data regulations and policies. Digital Society, 3(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00101-6
Ellerani, P., & Ferrari, L. (2024). The contribution of generative AI ecosystems in micro-instructional design: Opportunities and limitations. Formazione & insegnamento, 22(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXII-01-24_13
Fabbri, M. (2025). Dall’empowerment all’agency pedagogico-trasformativa: Prospettive di ricerca e linee per l’azione didattica. FrancoAngeli.
Farisco, M., Baldassarre, G., Cartoni, E., Leach, A., Petrovici, M. A., Rosemann, A., Salles, A., Stahl, B., & van Albada, S. J. (2024). A method for the ethical analysis of brain-inspired AI. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6), Article 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10769-4
Fengchun, M., & Mutlu, C. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
Ferrari, L., & Ingrosso, P. (2024). COO.DE - Cooperative digital education: Percorsi emancipativi in prospettiva inclusiva. Erickson.
Floridi, L. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), Article 20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360
Gambelin, O. (2020). Brave: What it means to be an AI ethicist. AI Ethics, 1(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00020-5
Gandorfer, D. (2022). Down and dirty in the field of play: Startup societies, cryptostatecraft, and critical complicity. Law and Critique, 33, 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-022-09327-0
Garcia, E. V. (2024). The Other in the machine: Diplomacy and the AI conundrum. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 21, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00329-6
Gerstgrasser, M., Danino, T., & Keren, S. (2023). Selectively sharing experiences improves multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’23) (pp. 2433–2435). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3598958
Gil, R. M., Ryan, M., & García, R. (2025). Sovereignty by design and human values in agriculture data spaces. Agriculture and Human Values, 42(3), 1413–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10674-0
Guan, C., Xue, K., Fan, C., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Yuan, L., Qian, C., & Yu, Y. (2024). Open and real-world human-AI coordination by heterogeneous training with communication. Frontiers of Computer Science, 19, Article 194314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-3797-6
Hagendorff, T. (2023). AI ethics and its pitfalls: Not living up to its own standards? AI Ethics, 3(1), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00173-5
Huang, L. T. L., Papyshev, G., & Wong, J. K. (2025). Democratizing value alignment: From authoritarian to democratic AI ethics. AI Ethics, 5, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00624-1
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Keane, L., & Allen, R. E. (2022). Any-play: An intrinsic augmentation for zero-shot coordination. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’22) (pp. 853–861). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3535850.3535946
Koster, R., Balaguer, J., Tacchetti, A., Weinstein, A., Zhu, T., Hauser, O., Williams, D., Campbell-Gillingham, L., Thacker, P., Botvinick, M., & Summerfield, C. (2022). Human-centred mechanism design with Democratic AI. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10), 1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01383-x
LaCroix, T., & Mohseni, A. (2022). The tragedy of the AI commons. Synthese, 200, Article 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03763-2
Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace (R. Bononno, Trans.). Perseus Books.
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Makandar, A. (2024). Digital surveillance capitalism and cities: Data, democracy and activism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 1533. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03941-2
Malone, T. W., & Bernstein, M. S. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of collective intelligence. MIT Press.
Margiotta, U. (Ed.). (2018). Teacher education agenda: Linee guida per la formazione iniziale dei docenti della scuola secondaria. Erickson.
Marvin, G., Tamale, M., Kanagwa, B., & Jjingo, D. (2023). Philosophical review of artificial intelligence for Society 5.0. In A. Yadav, S. J. Nanda, & M. H. Lim (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Paradigms of Communication, Computing and Data Analytics: PCCDA 2023 (Algorithms for Intelligent Systems, pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4626-6_1
McKee, K. R. (2024). Human participants in AI research: Ethics and transparency in practice. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3446183
McKee, K. R., Bai, X., & Fiske, S. T. (2024). Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 38(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-024-09649-6
Mikhaylovskaya, A. (2024). Enhancing deliberation with digital democratic innovations. Philosophy & Technology, 37(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00692-x
Montes, N. (2022). Engineering pro-social values in autonomous agents: Collective and individual perspectives. In D. Baumeister & J. Rothe (Eds.), Multi-agent systems: EUMAS 2022 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 13442, pp. 431–434). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20614-6_26
Mun, J., Jiang, L., Liang, J., Chung, I., DeCario, N., Choi, Y., Kohno, T., & Sap, M. (2025). Particip-AI: A democratic surveying framework for anticipating future AI use cases, harms and benefits. In Proceedings of the 2024 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 997–1010). AAAI Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3716662.3716749
Noorman, M., & Swierstra, T. (2023). Democratizing AI from a sociotechnical perspective. Minds & Machines, 33(4), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09651-z
Okada, A., Sherborne, T., Panselinas, G., & Kolionis, G. (2025). Fostering transversal skills through open schooling supported by the CARE-KNOW-DO pedagogical model and the UNESCO AI competencies framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(4), 1953–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00458-w
Orzan, N., Acar, E., Grossi, D., & Rădulescu, R. (2024). Emergent cooperation under uncertain incentive alignment. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’24) (pp. 1521–1530). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663012
Orzan, N., Acar, E., Grossi, D., & Rădulescu, R. (2025). Learning in public goods games: The effects of uncertainty and communication on cooperation. Neural Computing & Applications, 37, 18899–18932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10530-6
Panciroli, C., & Macauda, A. (2021). Intelligenza artificiale in una prospettiva educativo-didattica. Bononia University Press.
Panciroli, C., & Rivoltella, P. C. (2023). Pedagogia algoritmica: Per una riflessione educativa sull’intelligenza artificiale. Scholé.
Pasta, S., & Rondonotti, M. (2020). Competenze mediaeducative e tecnologie di comunità: Nuove direzioni per il lavoro socioeducativo territoriale. Rivista Italiana di Educazione Familiare, 17(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.13128/rief-9557
Perera, I., de Nijs, F., & García, J. (2025). Learning to cooperate against ensembles of diverse opponents. Neural Computing & Applications, 37, 18835–18849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10511-9
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Pollock, D., Peters, M. D. J., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Alexander, L., Tricco, A. C., Evans, C., Brandão de Moraes, É., Godfrey, C. M., Pieper, D., Saran, A., Stern, C., & Munn, Z. (2023). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123
Rachum, R., Nakar, Y., Tomlinson, B., Alon, N., & Mirsky, R. (2024). Emergent dominance hierarchies in reinforcement learning agents. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’24) (pp. 2426–2428). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663182
Ranieri, M. (2020). Tecnologie per educatori socio-pedagogici: Metodi e strumenti. Carocci Faber.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital competence of educators. Joint Research Centre. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770
Ribeiro-Navarrete, B., Saura, J. R., & Simón-Moya, V. (2024). Setting the development of digitalization: State-of-the-art and potential for future research in cooperatives. Review of Managerial Science, 18(5), 1459–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00663-8
Rivoltella, P. C. (2017). Media education: Idea, metodo, ricerca. ELS La Scuola.
Sætra, H. S., Borgebund, H., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). Avoid diluting democracy by algorithms. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(10), 804–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00537-w
Saheb, T., & Saheb, T. (2024). Mapping ethical artificial intelligence policy landscape: A mixed method analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00472-6
Sato, E., & Osawa, H. (2020). Reducing partner’s cognitive load by estimating the level of understanding in the cooperative game Hanabi. In T. Cazenave, J. van den Herik, A. Saffidine, & I.-C. Wu (Eds.), Advances in computer games: ACG 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12516, pp. 11–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65883-0_2
Schrepel, T., & Potts, J. (2024). Measuring the openness of AI foundation models: Competition and policy implications. Information & Communications Technology Law, 34(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2461953
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Shi, M., Wang, G., Zhang, S., Jiang, J., & Xiang, Y. (2025). AISCW: Artificial intelligence supported cooperative work: The new frontier of CSCW. In H. Sun, H. Fan, Y. Gao, X. Wang, D. Liu, B. Du, & T. Lu (Eds.), Computer supported cooperative work and social computing: ChineseCSCW 2024 (Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 2343, pp. 3–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2373-0_1
Shi, Y., Yu, K., Dong, Y., & Chen, F. (2026). Large language models in education: A systematic review of empirical applications, benefits, and challenges. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, Article 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100529
Simões, M. A. C., da Silva, R. M., & Nogueira, T. A. (2020). Dataset schema for cooperative learning from demonstration in multi-robot systems. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 99(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01123-w
Stathis, G., & van den Herik, J. (2025). Ethical and preventive legal technology. AI Ethics, 5(2), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00413-2
Steinhoff, J. (2024). AI ethics as subordinated innovation network. AI & Society, 39(4), 1995–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01658-5
Stucke, M. E. (2022). Breaking away: How to regain control over our data, privacy, and autonomy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197617601.003.0001
Su, E., Raffe, W., Mathieson, L., & Wang, Y. (2024). Better understanding of humans for cooperative AI through clustering. In 2024 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoG60054.2024.10645647
Tartaro, A., Panai, E., & Cocchiaro, M. Z. (2024). AI risk assessment using ethical dimensions. AI Ethics, 4(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00401-6
Taylor, R. R., Murphy, J. W., Hoston, W. T., & Senkaiahliyan, S. (2025). Democratizing AI in public administration: Improving equity through maximum feasible participation. AI & Society, 40(5), 3653–3662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02120-w
Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F., Mohamed, S., Picciariello, A., Connelly, B., Belgrave, D. C. M., Ezer, D., van der Haert, F. C., Mugisha, F., Abila, G., Arai, H., Almiraat, H., Proskurnia, J., Snyder, K., Otake-Matsuura, M., Othman, M., Glasmachers, T., de Wever, W., Teh, Y. W., Khan, M. E., De Winne, R., Schaul, T., & Clopath, C. (2020). AI for social good: Unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 2468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Trinidad, J. E. (2025). From accountability to algorithms: Interorganizational learning and the transformation of quantification in education. Qualitative Sociology, 48(2), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-024-09590-w
Tsamados, A., Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2024). Human control of AI systems: From supervision to teaming. AI and Ethics, 5, 1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00489-4
Veitch, E., Dybvik, H., Steinert, M., & Alsos, O. A. (2024). Collaborative work with highly automated marine navigation systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 33(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09450-7
Verdegem, P. (2022). Dismantling AI capitalism: The commons as an alternative to the power concentration of Big Tech. AI & Society, 39, 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01437-8
von Schenk, A., Klockmann, V., & Köbis, N. (2023). Social preferences towards humans and machines: A systematic experiment on the role of machine payoffs. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4145868
Wang, L., Fu, F., & Chen, X. (2024). Mathematics of multi-agent learning systems at the interface of game theory and artificial intelligence. Science China Information Sciences, 67(6), Article 166201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-024-3997-0
Westphaln, K. K., Regoeczi, W., Masotya, M., Vazquez-Westphaln, B., Lounsbury, K., McDavid, L., Lee, H., Johnson, J., & Ronis, S. D. (2021). From Arksey and O’Malley and beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX, 8, Article 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375
Woods, D. (2025). Stag hunt in the digital wilds: Legitimizing global AI governance amidst diverse terrains. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-025-00438-3
Xu, Z. (2022). From algorithmic governance to govern algorithm. AI & Society, 39(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01554-4
Zhang, L., Wu, J., Mumtaz, S., Li, J., Gacanin, H., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019). Edge-to-edge cooperative artificial intelligence in smart cities with on-demand learning offloading. In 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013878
Zheng, X., Zhou, G., & Zeng, D. D. (2023). Platform governance in the era of AI and the digital economy. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(1), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0241-1
Zygmuntowski, J. O. (2023). Data governance in a trilemma: A qualitative analysis of rights, values, and goals in building data commons. Digital Society, 2(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00058-y
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Categorías
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Elisabetta Miraglio, Luca Ferrari, Claudia Iormetti
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Formazione & insegnamento se distribuye bajo la licencia Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Para más detalles, por favor refiérase a nuestra Política de Repositorio y Archivo, así como a nuestros Términos de Derechos de Autor y Licencia.
