Reflective practices in teacher education for and through technologies

Authors

  • Nadia Sansone Unitelma Sapienza
  • Manuela Fabbri
  • Ilaria Bortolotti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-01-23_29

Keywords:

Formative interventions, Teacher continuous professional development, Active teaching, Assessment

Abstract

In this paper we describe a training course for in-service teachers in which reflective processes gain value within a community of practice nurtured by collaborative activities and constant confrontation about the participants’ professionalism embodied in the creative and design actions solicited by the course itself: a I Level university master's degree, delivered in e-Learning mode and based on an experiential training model and inspired by the Trialogical Learning & Assessment Approach, whereby learners are called upon to create shared and meaningful objects together, through the mediation of digital tools and by participating in diversified activities of reflection, revision and improvement of their own products, with the aim of experiencing with methodologies and technologies useful for modifying their teaching in a socio-constructivist direction.

The article reports the results of a qualitative study carried out through content analysis of the utterances of teachers urged to reflect on their own learning journey.

References

Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Halliday, J., & Low, J. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. Instructional Science, 29, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2001.1.1.37

Baldacci, M. (Ed.) (2013). La formazione dei docenti in Europa. Milano-Torino: Bruno Mondadori.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for Learning Society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGilly K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.

Capperucci, D. (2007). La valutazione delle competenze in età adulta il contributo dell’experiential learning e dell’approccio riflessivo. Pisa: ETS.

Castoldi, M. (2015). Didattica generale. Milano: Mondadori Università.

Cesareni, D., Ligorio, M.B., Sansone, N. (2018). Fare e collaborare. L'approccio trialogico nella didattica. Milano:FrancoAngeli.

Dewey, J. (1961). Come pensiamo: una riformulazione del rapporto fra il pensiero riflessivo e l’educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Fabbri, L. (2009). Comunità di pratiche e apprendimento riflessivo. Per una formazione situata. Roma: Carocci.

Fabbri, L. (2014). L’insegnante riflessivo. Coltivazione e trasformazione delle pratiche professionali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Ghaye, T. (2010). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action, second edition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833322

Glatthorn, A. (1995). Teacher development, in L. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, II Edition (pp. 41–46). London: Pergamon Press.

Lyons, N. (Ed.) (2010). Handbook of Reflection and Reflective Inquiry. Boston: Springer.

Liu, N.F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582

Michelini, M.C. (2016). Fare comunità di pensiero. Insegnamento come pratica riflessiva. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating Feedback from the Reactive to the Proactive. In D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and Professional Education (pp. 34–49). London: Routledge.

Nicol, D. (2020). The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparator processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778.

Nicol D. (2021). Guiding learning by activating students’ inner feedback. Times Higher Education. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/guiding-learning-activating-students-inner-feedback

Nuzzaci, (2009). La riflessività nella progettazione educativa: verso una riconcettualizzazione delle routine. Italian Journal of Educational Research, I, 59–75.

Nuzzaci, A. (2011). Pratiche riflessive, riflessività e insegnamento. Studium Educationis, XII(3), 9–28.

Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). The Knowledge Creation Metaphor – An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557.

Perla, L. (Ed.) (2019). Valutare per valorizzare. La documentazione per il miglioramento scolastico. Brescia: La Morcelliana.

Pescheux, M. (2007). Analyse des pratiques enseignantes en FLE/S. Mémento pour une ergonomie didactique du FLE. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Petrucco, C., & Grion, V. (2015). An exploratory study on perceptions and use of technology by novice and future teachers: More information and less on-line collaboration? International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 6(3), 50–64.

Perrenoud, P. (2001). Développer la pratique réflexive dans le métier d’enseignant. Paris: ESF.

Pultorak, E. G. (2010), The purposes, practices, and professionalism of teacher reflectivity: insights for twenty-first century teachers and students. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

Sansone N., Cesareni D., Bortolotti I., & Buglass S. (2019). Teaching technology-mediated collaborative learning for trainee teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3): 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1623070

Sansone, N., & Grion, V. (in press). The Trialogical Learning & Assessment Approach: Design Principles for Higher Education. QWERTY, 17(2).

Sansone, N., Bortolotti, I., Fabbri, M. (2021). Il peer-assessment nella formazione insegnanti: accorgimenti e ricadute, in Education Sciences and Society, 12(2). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Sansone N., Ritella G. (2020). Formazione insegnanti "aumentata": integrazione di metodologie e tecnologie al servizio di una didattica socio-costruttivista. QWERTY, 15, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000023

Sansone N. (2020). Etivity. In P. Limone, G. Toti, N. Sansone (Eds.), Didattica universitaria a distanza. Tra emergenza e futuro (pp. 61–74). Bari: Progedit.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. (1993). Il professionista riflessivo. Per una nuova epistemologia della pratica professionale. Bari: Dedalo.

Serbati, A., Grion, V., Li, L., & Doria, B. (2022). Online assessment: exemplars as the best sources for comparison processes? In Auer, M.E., Pester, A., & May D. (Eds.), Learning with Technologies and Technologies in learning. Experience, Trends and Challenges in Higher Education (pp.419–434), Switzerland: Springer.

Serbati, A., & Grion, V. (2019). IMPROVe: Six research-based principles to realise peer assessment in educational contexts. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 19(3), 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/form-7707

Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Danger of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, 27(2). 4–13. DOI:10.2307/1176193

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Striano, M. (2001). La “razionalità riflessiva” nell’agire educativo. Napoli: Liguori.

Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J. & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: ready for take-off?. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556

Wenger, E. (2006). Comunità di pratica. Apprendimento, significato e identità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

Sansone, N., Fabbri, M., & Bortolotti, I. (2023). Reflective practices in teacher education for and through technologies. Formazione & Insegnamento, 21(1), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-01-23_29