Sustainable Education to Promote Inclusion in Gifted Children throughout Socialization, after COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XX-01-22_58

Keywords:

Inclusion, Gifted children, Socialization, Pandemic

Abstract

Sustainable education promotes certain values such as: equity, respect, tolerance and inclusion, ideals that develop through social interactions. Our study investigated socialization in gifted children, after the covid-19 pandemic, to understand if some values of sustainable education are transmitted and if the presence or lack of such values can affect school and social inclusion. If before the pandemic the socialization of gifted children was compromised mainly due to their asynchronous development (Columbus group, 1991; Cross, 2015;), during the pandemic socialization was penalized by isolation, the decrease in interactions and the conflict experienced in the family (Aboud, 2021; Türksoy & Karabulut, 2020). In our small study, we created an online questionnaire based on some items from the ICF-CY (2007), that it was compiled by 21 parents of gifted children. The results show that gifted children, after the pandemic, struggle to express emotions; furthermore, there would be a renewed tendency towards isolation during conflict management; constant derision by peers for the special interests of the gifted. Values such as respect, acceptance of the unexpected and self-awareness of excesses would be in line with sustainable education. The implications for teaching are discussed in the article.

References

Aboud, Y. (2021). Challenges to gifted education in the Covid-19 pandemic about online learning in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of gifted students and parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 11-21.

Albarea, R. (2018). Creatività sostenibile: uno stile educativo. Pedagogia Oggi, XVI(1), pp. 129-144. https://doi.org/10.7346/PO-012018-09

ASviS (2020). L’Italia e gli Obiettivi di Sviluppo Sostenibile. Rapporto ASviS 2020. Roma: Alleanza Italiana per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile.

Bertin G.M. (1977). Nietzsche: l’inattuale, idea pedagogica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Brazzolotto, M. (2020). La plusdotazione in classe: le percezioni di alcuni insegnanti, genitori e dirigenti veneti, [Dissertation thesis], Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna. Dottorato di ricerca in Scienze pedagogiche, 32 Ciclo. https://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/AMSDOTTORATO/9507

Camino, E. (2011). La prospettiva gandhiana come contesto unificante per la “sustainability science” e l’educazione alla sostenibilità. Culture della sostenibilità, 7(1), 7-64.

Coggi C., Ricchiardi P. (2005). Progettare la ricerca empirica in educazione. Roma: Carocci

Columbus Group (1991). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH.

Cross, J. R. (2015). Gifted Children and Peer Relationships. In M. Neihart, S. Pfeiffer, & T. Cross (2015). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 41- 54). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. London: Little, Brown.

Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development (Vols. 1 & 2). Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.

De Blasis, M. C. (2021). La koinè della sostenibilità per l’educazione post-Covid 19. Formazione & Insegnamento, XIX(1), 352- 360. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XIX-01-21_31

Ellerani, P. (2014). Le opportunità di apprendimento nella formazione superiore. Prospettive internazionali secondo l’approccio di Martha Nussbaum. In Alessandrini, G. (a cura di). La «pedagogia» di Martha Nussbaum. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Farné, R. (2018). L’insostenibile pesantezza dell’educazione. Pedagogia Oggi, XVI(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.7346/PO-012018-04

Fiorucci, M. (2019). Introduzione. In Alessandrini, G. (a cura di). Sostenibilità e Capability Approach. Milano: Franco Angeli.

França-Freitas, M. L., Prette, A. D., & Prette, Z. A. (2014). Social skills of gifted and talented children. Estudos De Psicologia, 19(4), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-294x2014000400006

Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147.

Gallagher, J.J. (2011). Personnel preparation and secondary education program for gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 133-138.

Grange, T. (2018). Qualità dell’educazione e sviluppo sostenibile: un’alleanza necessaria, una missione pedagogica. Pedagogia Oggi, XVI(1), 19- 31. https://doi.org/10.7346/PO-012018-02

Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1987). The Relationship Between Adaptive Behavior and Social Skills. The Journal of Special Education, 21(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698702100115

Heller, K. A. (2005). The Munich Model of Giftedness and Its Impact on Identification and Programming. Gifted and Talented International, 20(1), 30-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2005.11673055

Hollingworth, L. S. (1931). The child of very superior intelligence as a special problem in social adjustment. Mental Hygiene, 15(1), 3-16.

Jolan, S. S. (2017). Hollingworth, Dabrowski, Gandhi, Columbus, and Some Others: The History of the Columbus Group. In C. S. Neville, M. M. Piechowski & S. S. Jolan, Off the Charts. Asynchrony and the Gifted Child (pp.1-9). Unionville, New York: Royal Fireworks Press.

Marsili, F., Morganti A., & Signorelli A., (2020). Intelligenza emotiva e plusdotazione. Una riflessione pedagogica. Psicologia dell’Educazione, 3, 19-35.

Morse, K. (2021). Gifted children & the pandemic: protecting emotional health. Michigan State University. GATE [Retrieved from https://gifted.msu.edu/about/226/gifted-childrenthe-pandemic-protecting-emotional-health ]

Murdock-Smith, J., (2013). Understanding the social and emotional needs of gifted children. Rivier Academic Journal, 9(2), 1-4.

Neihart, M., & Betts, G. (2010). Revised profiles of the gifted and talented. [Retrieved from

https://sciencetalenter.dk/sites/default/files/revised_profiles_of_the_gifted_and_talented_-_neihart_and_betts.pdf ]

OMS (2007). Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità. ICF-CY. Classificazione Internazionale del Funzionamento, della Disabilità e della Salute. Versione per bambini e adolescenti. Trento: Erickson.

Potts, J. A. (2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 58−80.

Renati, R., Bonfiglio, N. S., & Pfeiffer, S. (2016). Challenges raising a gifted child: Stress and resilience factors within the family. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416650948

Saukko P. (2005). Methodologies for cultural studies. An integrative approach. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 343-356). Thousand Oaks (California): Sage.

Semeraro. R. (2011). L’analisi qualitative dei dati di ricerca in educazione. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, IV, 97-106.

Silverman, L. K. (2013). Asynchronous development: Theoretical bases and current applications. In C. S. Neville, M. M. Piechowski, & S. S. Tolan (Eds.), Off the charts: Asynchrony and the gifted child (pp. 18–47). Unionville, NY: Royal Fireworks Press.

Terrassier, J. C. (1985). Dyssynchrony-uneven development. In J. Freeman (Ed.). The psychology of gifted children (pp. 265-274). New York: Wiley.

Türksoy, E., & Karabulut, R. (2020). Gifted students’ perceptions of distance education in the Covid-19 epidemy. Talent, 10(2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.773442

UNESCO (2015). Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Paris: Unesco Publishing.

Zanetti, M.A. (2017) (a cura di). Bambini e ragazzi ad alto potenziale. Una guida per educatori e famiglie. Roma: Carocci Faber.

Published

2022-05-30