A Inteligência Artificial Generativa torna obsoleta a metodologia de ensino baseada no debate?
Palavras-chave:
Inteligência Artificial Generativa, Debate competitivo, Artefatos cognitivos, Pensamento crítico, Inovação educacionalResumo
Este artigo investiga se a inteligência artificial generativa (IA), exemplificada por ferramentas como o ChatGPT, torna a metodologia do debate obsoleta. Analisa as respostas do setor educacional, que vão desde uma resistência inicial até uma adoção estratégica, bem como o impacto profundo no debate competitivo. Embora a IA aperfeiçoe a preparação por meio de ferramentas e estratégias iterativas de prompting, o estudo enfatiza a preservação de tarefas autenticamente humanas, como a habilidade retórica, a reflexão crítica e o raciocínio ético. Ao introduzir conceitos como “conjuntos de tarefas” e “artefatos cognitivos”, defende-se a integração da IA como complemento e não como substituição. A análise ressalta a necessidade de políticas equilibradas e de uma literacia crítica para harmonizar a inovação tecnológica com o valor duradouro da criatividade, da colaboração e da autonomia no debate. Longe de se tornar obsoleto, o debate evolui para um quadro dinâmico que combina inteligência humana e artificial.
Referências
Akerman, R., & Neale, I. (2011). Debating the evidence: An international review of current situation and perceptions. CfBT Education Trust in association with the English-Speaking Union.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, S. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Banks, D. C. (2023, May 18). ChatGPT caught NYC schools off guard. Now, we’re determined to embrace its potential. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/newyork/2023/5/18/23727942/chatgpt-nyc-schools-david-banks/
Baum, J., & Villasenor, J. (2023, May 8). The politics of AI: ChatGPT and political bias. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-politics-of-ai-chatgpt-and-political-bias/
Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2021). Could AI democratise education? Socio-technical imaginaries of an EdTech revolution. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.02034
Carroll, M. (2024, August 31). UK’s first ‘teacherless’ AI classroom set to open in London. Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/uks-first-teacherless-ai-classroom-set-to-open-in-london-13200637
Cassinadri, G. (2024). ChatGPT and the technology-education tension: Applying contextual virtue epistemology to a cognitive artifact. Philosophy and Technology, 37(14), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00701-7
Cressey, D. (2021, April 1). Am I arguing with a machine? AI debaters highlight need for transparency. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00867-6
DebateUS.org. (n.d.). How to write a PF debate case with AI in 30 minutes or less (and what to do with the saved time). https://debateus.org/how-to-write-a-pf-debate-case-with-ai-in-30-minutes-or-less-and-what-to-do-with-the-saved-time/
De Conti, M., & Giangrande, M. (2018). Debate. Teoria, pratica, pedagogia. Pearson.
Elstad, E. (2024). AI in education: Rationale, principles, and instructional implications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.12116
Findlay, G., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., David, I., Mayner, W. G. P., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2024). Dissociating artificial intelligence from artificial consciousness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04571. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.04571
Giangrande, M. (2024, April 3). Nuove frontiere della ricerca nel Debate. [Presentation for the Rete Wedebate]. https://www.sn-di.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Nuove-frontiere-della-ricerca-nel-Debate.pdf
Harvard University. (2023). Artificial intelligence courses. https://pll.harvard.edu/subject/artificial-intelligence?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Henriksen, D., Woo, L. J., & Mishra, P. (2023). Creative uses of ChatGPT for education: A conversation with Ethan Mollick. TechTrends, 67(4), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00862-w
Herman, D. (2022, December 9). The end of high-school English. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high-school-english-essay/672412/
Hern, A. (2022, December 4). AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/04/ai-bot-chatgpt-stuns-academics-with-essay-writing-skills-and-usability
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in education. AI and Ethics, 1(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
IBM Research. (2018). IBM debating technologies. https://research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/vst/debater.shtml
Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., & Shimada, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Implications for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0
INVALSI. (2022). Indagine internazionale OCSE PISA 2022: I risultati degli studenti italiani in matematica, scienze e lettura. FrancoAngeli.
Karpathy, A. (2024, July 16). Introducing Eureka Labs. https://eurekalabs.ai/
King, M., & ChatGPT. (2023). Why teachers should explore ChatGPT’s potential. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03505-5
Kumar, S., Verma, A. K., & Mirza, A. (2024). Digital revolution, artificial intelligence, and ethical challenges. In Digital transformation, artificial intelligence and society (pp. 161–177). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5656-8_11
Microsoft. (2024, September 17). BlackRock, Global Infrastructure Partners, Microsoft, and MGX launch new AI partnership to invest in data centres and supporting power infrastructure. Microsoft News Center. https://news.microsoft.com/2024/09/17/blackrock-global-infrastructure-partners-microsoft-and-mgx-launch-new-ai-partnership-to-invest-in-data-centers-and-supporting-power-infrastructure/
MIT News. (2024, August 27). First AI + Education summit is an international push for ‘AI fluency’. https://news.mit.edu/2024/first-ai-education-summit-0827
Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Penguin Random House.
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.10052
OpenAI. (2024). Learning to reason with LLMs. OpenAI Blog. https://openai.com/index/learning-to-reason-with-llms/
Ott, M. (2023, May 2). Chegg’s stock plunges on fears of competition from ChatGPT. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/chegg-stock-shares-chatgpt-ai-a877423bd4a8f67b1494363fc81cf52a
Roy, R. (2023, September 8). Artificial, but not exactly intelligent: AI in debate & NSDA regulations. Ethos Debate. https://www.ethosdebate.com/guest-post-artificial-but-not-exactly-intelligent-ai-in-debate-nsda-regulations-by-rik-roy/
Singer, N. (2023, August 24). Despite cheating fears, schools repeal ChatGPT bans. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/24/business/schools-chatgpt-chatbot-bans.html
Sutskever, I. [@ilyasut]. (2023, October 6). if you value intelligence above all other human qualities, you’re gonna have a bad time [Tweet]. X. https://x.com/ilyasut/status/1710462485411561808
Vosberg, S. (2024). The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 23). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-potential-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-equity-and-inclusion-in-education_15df715b-en.html
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Matteo Giangrande
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Formazione & insegnamento é distribuído sob a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Para obter mais detalhes, consulte nossa Política de Repositório e Arquivamento, bem como nossos Termos de Direitos Autorais e Licenciamento.
