Il "Brain Training": due diversi approcci all'intervento e alla valutazione

Autori

  • Dorothy Howie University of Auckland, d.howie@auckland.ac.nz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XX-02-22_05

Parole chiave:

Brain training, Feuerstein, Sternberg, Criteri di efficacia, Programma di arricchimento strumentale Feuerstein

Abstract

Questo contributo esplora la rivista della letteratura del 2016 di Simons e collaboratori sull’efficacia dei programmi di brain training in relazione al programma di arricchimento strumentale (PAS) Feuerstein che insegna come imparare. Si confronta il lavoro di Simons che si concentra su software “commerciali” per il brain training con la più ampia visione di Feuerstein orientata a generare modificabilità cognitiva strutturale. Il contributo discute così due diversi approcci valutativi, e presenta un set di criteri per una valutazione efficace alternativi al gold standard della tradizione clinica sperimentale utilizzati da Simons e coll. Si rivisitano così i criteri per valutare le abilità intellettuali di Sternberg, e si applicano in modo sistematico alla rivista di Simons e poi al metodo Feuerstein basandosi su un’ampia letteratura.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Arbitman-Smith, R., Haywood, H.C. and Bransford, J.D. (1984). Assessing cognitive change. In P.H. Brooks, R. Sperber, and C. McCauley (eds.). Learning and Cognition in the Mentally Retarded. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bachor, D.G. (1988). Do mentally handicapped adults transfer cognitive skills from the instrumental enrichment classroom to other situations or settings? The Mental Retardation and Learning Disability Bulletin, 16, 2, 14 – 28.

Blagg, N. (1991). Can We Teach Intelligence? A Comprehensive Evaluation of Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bowie, C.R., Gupta, M., Holshausen, K., Jokic, R., Best, M., and Milev, R. (2013). Cognitive remediation for treatment-resistant depression: Effects on cognition and functioning and the role of online homework. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 680 – 685.

Bradley, T.B. (1983). Remediation of cognitive deficits: A critical appraisal of the Feuerstein model. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 27. 79 – 92.

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, Ra.S., Falik, L. and Rand, Y. (2006). Creating and Enhancing Cognitive Modifiability: The Feuerstein Instrumental Enrichment Program. (Revised and expanded edition of Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability.) Jerusalem: ICELP Publications.

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M.B. and Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.

Herson, M. and Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behaviour Change. New York: Pergamon Press.

Howie, D. (2020) Thinking about the Teaching of Thinking: The Feuerstein Approach.2nd edition, London: Routledge.

Howie, D.R., Richards, R. and Pirihi, H. (1993). Teaching thinking skills to Maori adolescents. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3, 17 – 91.

Howie, D.R., Thickpenny, J.P., Leaf, C.A., and Absolum, M.A. (1985). The piloting of ‘Instrumental Enrichment’ in New Zealand with eight mildly retarded children. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 3 – 16.

O’Hanlon, K. (2011). Changing children’s minds: Instrumental Enrichment. A Thinking Skills Program Research Report, 2004 – 2009., Queen’s University, Belfast.

Ruiz, C.J. and Castaneda, E. (1983). Effects of the instrumental enrichment program on cognitive and non-cognitive factors in subjects of different socioeconomic strata. Venezuela: Universidad de Guayana.

Savell, J.M., Twohig, P.T. and Rachford, D.L. (1986). Empirical status of Feuerstein’s ‘Instrumental Enrichment’ (FIE) technique as a method of teaching thinking skills. Review of Educational Research,56, 381 – 409.

Shayer, M. and Beasley, F. (1987). Does Instrumental Enrichment work? British Educational Research Journal, 13, 101-119.

Simons, D.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S.E., Chabris, C.F., Hambrick, D.Z. and Stine-Morrow, E.A.L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 3, 103 – 186.

Sternberg, R.J. (1979). The nature of mental abilities. American Psychologist, 34, 214 – 230.

Sternberg, R.J. (1983). Criteria for intellectual skills training. Educational Researcher, 6 – 12, 26.

Sternberg, R.J. (1984). How can we teach intelligence? Educational Leadership, September, 42(1), 38 – 48.

Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Instrumental and componential approaches to the nature and training of intelligence. In S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, and R. Glaser (eds.) Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol.2, Research and Open Questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sternberg, R.J. (2000). Group and individual differences in intelligence: What can and should we do about them? In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (eds.) Experience of Mediated Learning: An Impact of Feuerstein’s Theory in Education and Psychology. Oxford: Pergamon.

Sternberg, R.J. (2015). The current status of the Theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability in relation to theories of intelligence. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue, 2015.

Terman, L.M. and Merrill, M.A. (1960). Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale-3rd. Revision, Form L-M. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Thickpenny, J.P. and Howie, D.R. (1990). Teaching thinking skills to deaf adolescents: The implementation and evaluation of Instrumental Enrichment. International Journal of Cognitive Mediation and Mediated Learning, 1, 193 – 209.

Tzuriel, D., Samuels, M.T. and Feuerstein, R. (1988). Non-intellective factors in dynamic assessment. In R. Gupta and P. Coxhead (eds.) Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.

United Nations (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Geneva: United Nations.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2022-10-30

Come citare

Howie, D. (2022). Il "Brain Training": due diversi approcci all’intervento e alla valutazione. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(2 Suppl.), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XX-02-22_05