Some comparative research's results on school teachers: Remarks on OCSE-TALIS research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-IX-04-11_06

Keywords:

Teachers, TALIS, Teaching and Learning International Survey, Assessment and career development

Abstract

The international survey on teaching and learning - TALIS (Teaching And Learning International Survey) conducted by the OECD is the first comparative survey that captured the current state of school systems in the 23 participating countries, involving 70,000 among teachers and school administrators. The research focuses on public and private teachers of secondary level institutes by debating about some important aspects relating to elements that, in some way, affect the efficiency of learning and the quality of classroom climate: professional development, opinions, attitudes and practices adopted by teachers, teaching assessment and feedback and, ultimately, school leadership. In conclusion, the OECD recommends Italy to improve the quality of teaching, with particular attention regarding to: strengthen he initial qualification of teachers and more rigorous procedures for recruitment, selection through greater access to initial teacher training standardization and certification procedures. Furthermore to improve the attractiveness of the teaching profession by promoting teacher professional development, by introducing financial incentives based on the results, and by providing opportunities for career development and recertification based on performance, in order to create greater operational autonomy for school managers, in particular in the recruitment, assessment and career development of the teachers (conditional for the school empowerment).

References

Barone, C., (2010). La valutazione: verso una spirale al ribasso? In A. Cavalli e G. Argentin(a cura di), Gli insegnanti italiani: come cambia il modo di fare scuola. Terza indaginedell’Istituto IARD sulle condizioni di vita e di lavoro nella scuola italiana, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2010.

Caritas - Fondazione Agnelli – Treelle (2011). Rapporto. Gli alunni con disabilità nella scuola italiana: bilancio e proposte, Trento: Erikson.

Cellamare, S., Melchiori, R. (2010). La valutazione di politiche socioeducative. L’apportodella metodologia qualitativa. Parte prima. Caratteristiche generali e presupposti teo-rico-metodologici. qtimes webmagazine, anno II, n. 4, ottobre 2010, pp. 25-32.

Decreto Legislativo 15 aprile 2005, n.76.

European Commission/Eurydice (2002) The teaching profession in Europe: Profile, trendsand concerns. Report II: Supply and demand. General lower education. Key topics ineducation. Volume 3, Brussels: European Commission/Eurydice.

European Commission/Eurydice/Eurostat (2005). Key data on education in Europe 2005. Brussels: European Commission/Eurydice/Eurostat.

Ianes, D., Demo, H. e Zambotti, F. (2010). Gli insegnanti e l’integrazione. Atteggiamenti, opinioni e pratiche, Trento: Erickson.

Melchiori, R., La qualità della formazione. Un framework per l’esame della pratica scolastica, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia, (in corso di stampa).

Melchiori, R. (2011). Per una pedagogia della valutazione. Genesi di un nuovo campo disci-plinare, Qtimes, vol. 4, , pp. 28-35.

Melchiori, R. (2010). Rapporto nazionale sui risultati della ricerca IEA-SITES, Frascati: INVALSI.

Melchiori, R.., Cellamare S. (2011). La valutazione di politiche socioeducative. L’apporto della metodologia qualitativa. Parte seconda. I risultati dell’intervento e la valutazioneinterpretativa. qtimes webmagazine, anno III, n. 1, gennaio 2011, pp. 26 – 35.

OCSE (2004). Completing the Foundation for Lifelong Learning. An OCSE Survey of UpperSecondary Schools. Paris: OCSE PRESS.

OCSE (2005a). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OCSE PRESS.

OECD (2009). Studi economici: Italia, versione italiana, Paris: OCSE PRESS.

Published

2011-12-31

How to Cite

Melchiori, R. (2011). Some comparative research’s results on school teachers: Remarks on OCSE-TALIS research. Formazione & Insegnamento, 9(3 Suppl.), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-IX-04-11_06