Peer feedback features and evaluative judgment in a blended university course
The literature on assessment in higher education largely highlighted the important role of feedback to promote learning (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). More recent research demonstrates that
peer feedback is particularly effective in improving student learning, in some cases even more than feedback offered by the teacher (Nicol, 2018). Furthermore, the implementation of peer
feedback processes seems to contribute to the development of student assessment literacy and the ability to elaborate and formulate evaluative judgments (Boud, Ajjavi, Dawson, & Tai, 2018).
Despite the relevance of these topics to learning in higher education, at international level and in particular in the Italian context, only very few studies specifically investigated how the different
types of peer feedback affect learning and how, in these contexts, students develop evaluative judgement skills. In this article we aim at presenting an empirical research work exploring these issues within a broader research on the role of peer review for learning carried at the University of Padova. The results make it possible to consider peer review as a significant teaching and learning tool, through which offer students the possibility to improve and develop assessment literacy and thus to become effective lifelong learners.
How to Cite
The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the rights to their work and give the magazine the right to first publish the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution which allows others to share the work indicating the intellectual authorship and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that the first publication took place in this magazine.
- Authors can disseminate their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase citations of the published work.