Teacher Mediation in Coding Activities: A Case Study Using an Inclusive Research Approach in Early Childhood Education
Keywords:
Teacher's mediation, Technology, ECEC, Inclusive reserach, Feuerstein, Inclusive educationAbstract
This study explores how teachers mediate a coding toy activity within an Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) setting to ensure the inclusion of all children. Coding activities not only develop fundamental computer science skills but also enhance children's critical thinking problem-solving ability and collaboration, already from preschool. Inclusive research methodologies have demonstrated effectiveness in improving educational practices for all children, regardless of neurodevelopmental differences. This case study involved two teachers and eight 5-year-old children, two with developmental disabilities, in a problem-solving activity designed through inclusive research, using a screen-free coding robot. Data collected from teachers' field notes focused on how they mediated children’s engagement and cooperation. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: teacher planning, teacher mediation, and the role of the artifact. The discussion also reflects on the connection to Feuerstein’s theory of mediated learning and the value of inclusive research in promoting engagement for all children.
References
Abdul Rahim, F., Hood, P., & Coyle, D. (2009). ‘Becoming experts’: learning through mediation. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 6, 1-21. http://mjli.uum.edu.my
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2015). Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM, 47(3), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0636-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bussi, M. B., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 746.
DiCoTe: Increasing professional Digital Competence in ECTE with focus on enriching and supporting children’s play with coding toys. (2024, March 1). [Institutional website]. University of Stavanger. https://www.uis.no/en/research/dicote-increasing-professional-digital-competence-in-ecte-with-focus-on-enriching-and
Feuerstein, R., Klein, P. S., & Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). Mediated learning experience (MLE): Theoretical, psychosocial and learning implications. Freund Publishing House Ltd.
Fine, G. A., & Sandstrom, K. L. (1988). Knowing children: Participant observation with minors (Vol. 15). SAGE Publications, Incorporated. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_books/35
Gottschalk, F. and C. Weise (2023), “Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 299, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7cb15030-en.
Granone, F., Johansen, M., Reikerås, E.K.L., Kvalø, T.M.K. (2023) “Nothing About Us Without Us”: the first example of inclusive research in Early Childhood Education in Norway. Consultori Familiari Oggi, 31 (1), 69-82.
Granone, F., & Knudsen, G. (2024). Supporting children’s spatial understanding through technology: The importance of dialogical exchange analysed through inclusive research. In J. Davis, Adams, S., Challen C., and Bourke, T. (Ed.), Designing Inclusive Assessment in the School: A Guide to Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Practice. Routledge.
Granone, F., & Reikerås, E. K. L. (2021). Preschoolers learning by playing with technology. Education in Childhood, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97791
Granone, F., & Reikerås, E. K. L. (2023). Teachers’ support for children’s mathematical learning through interactions while playing with a coding toy. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 28(3-4), 55-76.
Johnson, K., & Walmsley, J. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: Past, present and futures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
KUBO Education ApS. (2024). The Creative STEM Robot for Elementary [Association website]. KUBO. https://kubo-robot.com/
Malaguzzi, L. (1993). The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: the role of the teacher. ZDM, 41(4), 427-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0199-z
Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori Method: Scientific Pedagogy as Applied to Child Education in the Children’s Houses. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and teacher education, 21(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
Niess, M. L. (2006). Guest Editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 6(2), 195-203. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22932/.
Nind, M. (2014). Inclusive research and inclusive education: why connecting them makes sense for teachers’ and learners’ democratic development of education. Cambridge Journal of education, 44(4), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.936825
Nordahl, T., Nordahl, S. Ø., Sunnevåg, A.-K., Berg, B., & Martinsen, M. (2018). Det gode er det fremragende sin fiende: Resultater fra kartleggningsundersøkelser i kristiansand kommune 2013-2017.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children’s learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802584061
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2018). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. In The journal of the learning sciences (pp. 337-386). Psychology Press.
Reiser, B. J. (2018). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. In The Journal of the Learning sciences (pp. 273-304). Psychology Press.
Seale, J., Nind, M., & Parsons, S. (2014). Inclusive research in education: Contributions to method and debate. In (Vol. 37, pp. 347-356): Taylor & Francis.
Shumway, J. F., Welch, L. E., Kozlowski, J. S., Clarke-Midura, J., & Lee, V. R. (2021). Kindergarten students’ mathematics knowledge at work: the mathematics for programming robot toys. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1982666
Statped. (2024). Alternativ og supplerende kommunikasjon (ASK) [Institutional website]. Statped: Statlig Spesialpedagogisk Tjeneste. https://www.statped.no/ask/
Turan, S., & Aydoğdu, F. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Scientific legacy. Springer Science & Business Media.
Walmsley, J., Strnadová, I., & Johnson, K. (2018). The added value of inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(5), 751-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12431
Walmsley, J., & Team, C. E. P. F. H. P. (2014). Telling the history of self‐advocacy: A challenge for inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12086
Østby, M., & Haugenes, M. (2019). Inkluderende forskning sammen med personer med utviklingshemming: en metodebok [Including research with people with learning disabilities: A method book]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francesca Granone
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Formazione & insegnamento is distributed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
For further details, please refer to our Repository & Archiving Policy, as well as our Copyright & Licensing Terms.
