Construction Versus Closed Analogies: Effects of Mediation and Relation to Working Memory




Dynamic assessment, Analogical thinking, Working memory, Cognitive modifiability


The goals of the current study are to examine (a) the effect of mediation of Construction Analogies versus mediation of Closed Analogies on cognitive modifiability in analogical thinking (b) the effect of mediation of analogies on working memory (WM), and (c) the correlation pattern between analogical thinking and WM in Construction and Closed analogies. A sample of Grade 1 children (49 boys and 47 girls) were randomly assigned to Construction analogies (E1, n = 48) and Closed Analogies (E2, n = 48) groups. Children in E1 group were administered the Construction version of the Analogical Modifiability Puzzle Test (AMPT) and children in E2 group were administered the Closed version. Both versions were administered in a dynamic assessment (DA) procedure which includes pre-teaching, teaching and post-teaching phases. Both groups were administered the Children’s Spatial Working Memory (CSWM) test before and after the teaching phase. The findings reveal that both groups improved their analogical thinking from pre- to post-Teaching, with E1 group showing higher improvement than E2 group. Both groups showed significant pre- to post-teaching improvement in WM-- a finding that indicates far-transfer effects. Analogical thinking was significantly correlated with WM in pre-Teaching phase of Construction Analogies whereas analogical thinking was significantly correlated with WM in post-teaching phase of Closed Analogies. The findings raise questions about the cognitive factors involved measuring analogical thinking using a closed analogies format. The findings are discussed in relation to the effects of task characteristics, mediation in DA and recent research on WM.


Alfieri, L., Nokes, T.N., & Schunn, C.D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48, 87–113.

Baddeley, A.D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.

Brown, A. L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 369-412). Erlbaum.

Das Gupta, P., & Bryant, P. E. (1989). Young children’s causal inferences. Child Development, 60, 1138-1146.

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.

Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental psychology, 40(2), 177–190.

Gentner, D. (1996). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: children's performance on a casual-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13, 453-478.

Goswami, U. C. (2012). Analogical reasoning by young children. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 225–228). Springer.

Gray, M.E. & Holyoak K.J. (2020). Individual differences in relational reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 48, 96–110.

Guberman, S. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1991). Learning and transfer in everyday cognition. Cognitive Development, 6, 233-260.

Guthke, J., & Wingenfeld, S. (1992). The Learning Test concept: Origins, state of art, and trends. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive testing (pp. 64-93). Springer-Verlag.

Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: the development of mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.

Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. J. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117-142). Cambridge University Press.

Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234–259). Oxford University Press.

Krawczyk, D. C., Morrison, R. G., Viskontas, I., Holyoak, K. J., Chow, T. W., Mendez, M. F., et al. (2008). Distraction during relational reasoning: the role of prefrontal cortex in interference control. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2020-2032.

Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 6. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Elsevier.

Matlen B, Klahr D. (2012). Sequential effects of high and low instructional guidance on children’s acquisition and transfer of experimentation skills. Instructional Science, 41, 621–634.

Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer” evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 512-534.

Missiuna, C., & Samuels, M. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 53-62.

Paas, F., van Gog, T, & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives, Educational Psychology Review, 22, 15–121.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Raven, J. C. (1956). Guide to using the colored progressive matrices, sets A, Ab, and B. Lewis.

Piaget, J., Montangero, J., & Billeter, J. (1977). Les correlates. In J. Piaget (Ed.), L’abstraction reflechissante. Presses Universitaires de France.

Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Working memory test battery for children (WMTB-C). Psychological Corporation.‏

Ponitz, C. E. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141-158.

Resing, W. C. M. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for inductive reasoning (LIR) in young children. In C. S. Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229–262). JAI/Elsevier Science.

Resing, W. C. M., Elliott, J. G., & Vogelaar, B. (2020). Assessing potential for learning in school children. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education.

Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., De Jong, F. J., & Bosma, T. (2009). Dynamic testing: Individual differences and learning patterns in indigenous and ethnic minority children. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 445-450.

Richardson, K., & Webster, D. A. (1996). Analogical reasoning and the nature of context: A research note. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 23-32.

Richland, E.A., & Burchinal, M. (2013). Early executive function predicts reasoning development. Psychological Science, 24, 87-92. http://DOI:10.1177/0956797612450883

Richland, L.E., Morrison, R.G. & Holyoak, K.J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249–273.

Richland, E.A. & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education, WIREs Cognitive Science, http://doi:10.1002/wcs.1336

Sala, G., Gobet, F. (2020). Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 27, 423–434.

Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 408–426.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. Cambridge University Press.

Thibaut, J.-P., & French, R. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning, control, and executive functions: A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10–26.

Tzuriel, D. & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 359-380.

Tzuriel, D. (2000). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery: Assessment and Intervention. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375-406). Elsevier Science.

Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

Tzuriel, D. (2011). Revealing the effects of cognitive education programs by dynamic assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 113-131.

Tzuriel, D. (2012). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. In Mok, M.M.C., Lee, A.Y.P., & Lau, D.C.H. (Eds.), Assessment reform: Asia Pacific initiatives in assessment to inform learning and teaching. (pp. 235-255). Springer.

Tzuriel, D. (2018). Mother-child mediated learning experience strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability: Theoretical and research perspectives. In V. Trif (Ed.), Educational psychology - Between certitudes and uncertainties, IntechOpen.

Tzuriel, D. (2020). Dynamic cognitive assessment for preschool age children. In Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education. Oxford University Press.

Tzuriel, D. (2021). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Tzuriel, D. & Caspi, N. (1992). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability in deaf and hearing preschool children. Journal of Special Education, 26, 235-251.

Tzuriel, D. & Caspi, R. (2017). Intervention for peer-mediation and mother-child interaction: The effects on children’s mediated learning strategies and cognitive modifiability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 302-323.

Tzuriel, D. & Flor-Maduel, H. (2010). Prediction of early literacy by analogical thinking modifiability among kindergarten children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 207-227.

Tzuriel, D. & Groman, T. (2017). Dynamic assessment of figurative language of children in the autistic spectrum: The relation to some cognitive and language aspects. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16, 38-63.

Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Kanner, E., & Haywood, H.C. (1999). The effectiveness of Bright Start program in kindergarten on transfer abilities and academic achievements. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 114, 111-141.

Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539-552.

Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2010). Mediation strategies and cognitive modifiability in young children as a function of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) program and training in analogies versus math tasks. Journal of Cognitive Psychology and Education, 9, 48–72.

Tzuriel, D. & Shomron, V. (2018) The effects of mother—child mediated learning strategies on cognitive modifiability and psychological resilience of children with learning disability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 236-260.

Tzuriel, D. & Weiss (2019). The Children’s Spatial Working Memory Test. Talpiot College, Holon, Israel.

Tzuriel, D. & Weiss, T. (2022). The effects of working memory training on working memory, self-regulation, and analogical reasoning. Unpublished Paper. Faculty of Education, Bar Ilan University.

Weatherholt, T. N., Harris, R. C., Burns, B. M., & Clement, C. (2006). Analysis of attention and analogical reasoning in children of poverty. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 125–135.

White, C. S., & Alexander, P. A. (1986). Effects of training on four-year-olds’ ability to solve geometric analogy problems. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 261–268.

Wiedl, K. H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 93–119.




How to Cite

Tzuriel, D. (2022). Construction Versus Closed Analogies: Effects of Mediation and Relation to Working Memory. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(2 Suppl.), 34–49.