Lesson planning: from the Feuerstein Method to the Curricular Lesson





Feuerstein method, Mediated Learning, Lesson planning, Metacognition, Teaching


This contribution shows a possible  application of the Feuerstein methods in curricular teaching. In schools, there is a growing interest in the development of students’ propensity to learn, and results of evidence-based studies show that interactive approaches and conscious organization of the contents are key features of an effective lesson. A significant example of a dialogical modality of interaction and application of lesson planning is Feuerstein Instrumental Enrichment. The lesson planning, which is not popular in Italy, can be a chance for the teacher to develop a better awareness of the learning process in the classroom. Moreover, this contribution argues that the phases of the lesson as Feuerstein conceived decades ago are confirmed by the recent evidence-based research, thus showing how the enhancement of thinking is related not only to the curricular activities and contents, but also to the learning path designed wilfully by the teacher. Such path is articulated in phases, has explicit objectives, and is flexible and highly dialogical.


Calvani, A.(2014). Come fare una lezione efficace. Roma: Carocci.

Calvani, A. & Trinchero, R. (2019). Dieci falsi miti e dieci regole per insegnare bene. Roma: Carocci.

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society Biological Sciences. B 366: 1149–57.


Dehaene, S. (2019). Imparare. Milano: Cortina.

Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., Rand, Y., & Feuerstein, R.S. (2008). Il Programma di Arricchimento

Strumentale di Feuerstein. Trento: Erickson.

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R.S., & Falik, L. (2010). Beyond smarter:Mediated Learning and the Brain’s Capacity for Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fischer, R. (1998). Thinking about Thinking: Developing Metacognition. Children Early Child Development and Care,141 (1):1-15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233466909_Thinking_About_Thinking_Developing_Metacognition_in_Children

Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.


Gardner, H. (2007). Cinque chiavi per il futuro. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Hattie, J. (2016). Apprendimento visibile, insegnamento efficace. Trento: Erickson.

Hoppitt, W.J., Brown, G.R., Kendal, R., Rendell, L., Thornton, A., Webster, M.M., & Laland, K.N. (2008). Lessons from animal teaching. Trends Ecol Evol. Sep;23(9):486-93.


Minuto, M., & Ravizza, R. (2008). Migliorare i processi di apprendimento. Il Metodo Feuerstein dagli aspetti teorici alla vita quotidiana. Trento: Erickson.

Minuto, M. and Ravizza, R. (2014). A cosa servono le domande?, Psicologia dell’educazione, Vol.8 n°3 dicembre, 341-356.

Minuto, M., & Ravizza, R.(2020). Il lesson planning, consigli per l’uso. Le guide Sei: Strumenti operativi per una nuova didattica, S37-S47.

Morin, E. (2001). I sette saperi necessari all’educazione del futuro. Milano: Cortina.

Oliverio, A. (2017). Il cervello che impara. Firenze: Giunti.

Piaget, J. (2000). Lo sviluppo mentale del bambino. Torino: Einaudi.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2012). Neurodidattica. Insegnare al cervello che apprende. Milano: Cortina.

Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1997). Le tre intelligenze. Trento: Erickson.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292.


Walsh, J.A., & Sattes, B.D. (2011). Thinking Through Quality Questioning. Deepening Student Engagement. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.