Training understood as bureaucratic management of society

Authors

  • Elvia Ilaria Feola Pensa MultiMedia Editore

Abstract

The crisis that affected all social, economic and cultural areas has resulted in change of values and thwarted any certainty. It came together with a radical change of social and working coordinates because it posited new challenges regarding flexibility and adaptability, thus requiring individuals and companies to develop strategic capabilities and resourceful planning. Consequently,
the formative goal is that of redesigning educational processes
and presenting the individual with pathways that enable her to interpret the surrounding scenario—be it a social, economic, or organizational one. Furthermore, educational processes shall enable the individual to assess events, understand theories, methods, and both new and well-established techniques. By focusing on the reproduction and transferability of interventions,
companies may be better aided to identify specific needs and plan actions that could satisfy them.
All of the elements listed above are useful to the empowerment of the country as they all fight the economic recession: that is, by allowing individuals to develop useful skills during their lives, thus enriching their body of knowledge, skills and abilities. By creating new “markets” and new lifestyles, it is possible to deal with complexity and uncertainty: new skills are born (such as: communication, negotiation, flexibility, personal initiative,
teamwork) and help the subject to find a new place within culture, education and other opportunities of further growth.

Published

2013-03-03

How to Cite

Feola, E. I. (2013). Training understood as bureaucratic management of society. Formazione & Insegnamento, 11(1), 129–140. Retrieved from https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/656