Why Feuerstein Remains Important in the 21st Century: to Improve Thinking Skills and Inclusive Education – Reflections at the Occasion of the 100th birthday of Reuven Feuerstein





Mediated Learning Experience, Inclusive education, Down syndrome, Cultural deprivation, 21st century learning skills, Feuerstein Instrumental Enrichment


Although Feuerstein’s theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability and Mediated Learning Experience and its applied systems Learning Propensity Assessment and Instrumental Enrichment are already 70 years old, and do not have modern 21st century looks, Feuerstein’s approach remains highly relevant for the needs of teachers and learners in our times: inclusive education, the need to attend to a diversity of pupils at school, increasing numbers of children with learning or behaviour difficulties, ADHD or otherwise, the increasing digitalisation of society, the loss of social cohesion. These are hard challenges for teachers. This article starts making a critical cultural-historical reflection on the so-called “21st century cognitive challenges” and of characteristics of the Feuerstein programme. Then three case studies are presented were LPAD followed by a cognitive-mediational intervention made a turning point in their educational trajectory: a child and an adolescent with Down syndrome, and a recent African immigrant. The case studies underpin a further reflection why the Feuerstein approach offers a suitable answer to the discussed challenges.


Allan, J. (1999), Actively Seeking Inclusion. Pupils with Special Needs in Mainstream Schools. London: Routledge.

Blagg, N., Spitz, H.H. (1994). Can we teach intelligence? A comprehensive evaluation of Feuerstein's instrumental enrichment program. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 112 – 113.

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A and Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington: National Academy.

EADSNE - European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, 2020. European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education: 2018 Dataset Cross-Country Report. (J. Ramberg, A. Lénárt, and A. Watkins, eds.). Odense: Danmark.

Feuerstein R., Rand Y., & Rynders JE. (1988). Don't accept me as I am: helping "retarded" people to excel. New York: Plenum.

Franck, Emilie & Nicaise, Ides. (2021). Trends in ongelijkheden in het Vlaamse onderwijssysteem 2003-2015. [Trends in inequalities in Flemish education system] Leuven: HIVA.

Garbo R., Lebeer J (Eds.), (1994) In search of learning potential. Proceedings of the first European Conference on Instrumental Enrichment and Mediated Learning, Antwerpen 4-6 December 1993, Antwerpen/ Den Haag: Sardes-UIA (published in English & French).

Howie, D. (2020). Thinking about the teaching of thinking. The Feuerstein Approach. London: Routledge.

Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2012). Current evidence does not support the claims made for CogMed working memory training. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 197–200.

Karpov, Y. & Tzuriel, D. (2009) Dynamic Assessment: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, Journal of Cognitive Education & Psychology, 8(3), 228-237.

Keung, A.Y.-c., Ho, V.F.-l. and Shum, K.K.-m. (2022), Early cognitive intervention using mediated learning for preschoolers with developmental delay: A randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 24. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12490

Kleim, J.A. & Jones, T.(2008) Principles of Experience-Dependent Neural Plasticity: Implications for Rehabilitation After Brain Damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 225–239.

Kozulin, A., Lebeer, J. , Madella-Noja, A., Gonzalez, F., Jeffrey, I., Rosenthal, N., Koslowsky, M, (2010) Cognitive modifiability of children with developmental disabilities: a multicentre study using Feuerstein’s Instrumental Enrichment – Basic program, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 551–559.

Martínez-Beltrán, J.M., Lebeer, J. & Garbo, R. (Eds.) (1998) Is intelligence modifiable? Madrid: Editorial Bruño.

Lebeer, J. (1994), You are more than your brain. Plasticity of development of children with neurological impairments in the context of family interaction. A transdisciplinary Study. Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht (NL): University of Humanistic Studies.

Lebeer, J. (2014). Editorial. Clinical and educational implications of Reuven Feuerstein’s Mediated Learning Experience Theory: current scientific evidence. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue Clinical and educational applications of Reuven Feuerstein’s Mediated Learning Experience Theory: current scientific evidence, 3-8

Lebeer J. & Garbo R. (1997), Ecological influences in development of brain-impaired children: a multi-dimensional approach, in: Kozulin A. (Eds.), The Ontogeny of Cognitive Modifiability. Jerusalem: International Centre for the Enhancement of Learning Potential: 239-258

Lebeer J (1998) How much brain does a mind need? Scientific, Clinical and Educational Implications of ecological Plasticity Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 352-357.

Lebeer J. (Ed.) (2003), INSIDE. How to activate cognitive development of children with or at risk of developmental or learning problems inside the educational system? Southsea (UK): Down Syndrome Educational Trust Ltd.

Lebeer, J. (Ed.) (2006), In-clues. Clues to inclusive and cognitive education. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.

Lebeer, J. (2014) Modifiability and mediated learning in the light of neuroscientific evidence of ecological plasticity. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue Clinical and educational applications of Reuven Feuerstein’s Mediated Learning Experience Theory: current scientific evidence; 51-59

Lebeer, J., Candeias, A.A., & Grácio, L. (Eds.) (2011), With a different glance. Dynamic Assessment and Functioning of Children Oriented at Development & Inclusive Learning. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant Publishers.

Lebeer,J., Grácio, M.L., Sart, Z.H., Schraepen, B., Babür,N., Van den Eynde, R., Stoffels,L., & Gogacz, A. (2013), A preventive approach in inclusive education. Differentiating classroom practice for primary school teachers. Teachers’ guide. Istanbul: Bogagici University Press.

Lebeer, J., Nijland, M., Grácio, L., Schraepen, B. (2017) (Eds) Enabling Activity and Participation. Supporting Young People with Complex and Intense Support Needs: process book and DVD. Varna (BG): Helix Press & Enablin+ Project Group (simultaneously published in English, French, Dutch, Romanian, Hungarian, Italian, Bulgarian and Portuguese).

Loarer, E., Chartier, D., Huteau, M., & Lautrey, J. (1995). Peut-on éduquer l'intelligence? L'évaluation d'une méthode d'éducation cognitive. Peter Lang.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004). Innovation in the Knowledge Economy: Implications for Education and Learning. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Partanen, P., Jansson, B., Lisspers, J., & Sundin, Ö. (2015). Metacognitive strategy training adds to the effects of working memory training in children with special educational needs. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 7(3), 130–140.

Rosenthal R, Jacobsen E (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Savell, J.N., Twohig, P.T. en D.L. Rachford (1986). Empirical status of Feuerstein's Instrumental Enrichment Technique as a method for teaching thinking skills. Review of Educational Research, 56, 381-409.

Tzuriel, D. (2011). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability. Encyclopedia of Sciences of Learning. (pp. 2154-2157). New York: Springer.




How to Cite

Lebeer, J. (2022). Why Feuerstein Remains Important in the 21st Century: to Improve Thinking Skills and Inclusive Education – Reflections at the Occasion of the 100th birthday of Reuven Feuerstein. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(2 Suppl.), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XX-02-22_03