Validity and reliability of peer-grading in in-service teacher training
This paper aims to investigate the validity and reliability of peer-grading in in-service teacher training, a field where this practice has been little explored. The study has examined the peer-grading results in an inservice teacher training course involving high school teachers. The validity was measured by using the similarity between peer-grading and trainer-grading scores
calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficient; while the reliability was measured by using the agreement of scores given by multiple peer graders calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The empirical findings indicate that in-training teachers provided scores similar to those of the course trainers as well as fairly consistent grading results, thus highlighting that peer-generated grades seems to be valid and reliable in the field of in-service teacher training.
The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the rights to their work and give the magazine the right to first publish the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution which allows others to share the work indicating the intellectual authorship and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that the first publication took place in this magazine.
- Authors can disseminate their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and increase citations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).