I meme nei processi di insegnamento e apprendimento: una semiotica dell’attivazione cognitiva


  • Corrado Petrucco FISPPA Dept. University of Padova




Meme; teaching strategies;cognitive activation;


Memes have now become a constant presence on social media to connote important social, political and cultural events. Thanks to their communicative power, that with an image and a few lines of text summarizes a concept in an ironic way, their use has also spread in school and university didactic contexts as an innovative mediator in teaching/learning processes. The structure of the meme conveys a concentration of meaning and to be decoded correctly requires a considerable cognitive effort which involves the knowledge of a set of "encyclopedic" elements on a specific disciplinary domain, for example math or literature. Precisely this semiotic characteristic reveals its potential in teaching as a tool for cognitive activation and support for formant evaluation: the teacher can infact propose memes himself or have them made by students: in both cases he will have to verify their correct interpretation by providing immediate feedback about the meanings associated with the meme. However, memes must be used with care since they can also generate cognitive overload and convey cognitive or cultural stereotypes and are to be considered not substitutes but a useful complement to traditional active teaching strategies.


Albano, G. (2012) Processi cognitivi e rappresentazioni semiotiche: indagine preliminare. In G. Gerla, C. Coppola, T. Pacelli (a cura di) Logica, linguaggio e didattica della matematica Pag.15-26 Franco Angeli Editore.

Antón-Sancho, Á., Nieto-Sobrino, M., Fernández-Arias, P., & Vergara-Rodríguez, D. (2022). Usability of Memes and Humorous Resources in Virtual Learning Environments. Education Sciences, 12(3), 208

Ambrus, L. (2017). Categorization of Memes. Opus et Educatio, 4(2).

Antón-Sancho, Á., Nieto-Sobrino, M., Fernández-Arias, P., & Vergara-Rodríguez, D. (2022). Usability of Memes and Humorous Resources in Virtual Learning Environments. Education Sciences, 12(3), 208.

Badli, T. S. Z. T., & Dzulkifli, M. A. (2013). The effect of humour and mood on memory recall. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 252-257.

Bini, G., & Robutti, O. (2019). Thinking inside the post: Investigating the didactical use of mathematical internet memes. In PME & YANDEX (pp. 101-108). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME).

Bini, G., Robutti, O., & Montagnani, M. (2021). When They Tell You That i 56= 1: Affordances of Memes and GeoGebra in Mathematics. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 28(3).

Bock, M. A. (2020). Theorising visual framing: contingency, materiality and ideology. Visual Studies, 35(1), 1-12.

Brodie, R. (2011). Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme, Hay House Inc. Reissue, 2011

Brown, J. D. (2020). What Do You Meme, Professor? An Experiment Using “Memes” in Pharmacy Education. Pharmacy, 8(4), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040202

Burge, B., Lenkeit, J., & Sizmur, J. (2015). PISA in practice: Cognitive activation in maths. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

Byosiere, S. E., Blackwell, C. E., Gordon, M., & Ventura, B. (2021). MEME: Motivating Engagement using Meme Examples. Journal of interactive technology and pedagogy.

Cannizzaro, Sara. "Internet memes as internet signs: A semiotic view of digital culture." Σημειωτκή-Sign Systems Studies 44, no. 4 (2016): 562-586.

Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. John Wiley & Sons.

Cohn, N. (2016). A multimodal parallel architecture: A cognitive framework for multimodal interactions. Cognition, 146, 304-323.

Corazza, L. (2012). Il video, un mediatore per l’apprendimento. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 12(79), 13-21.

Crupi, G. (2017). Dare La Parola All'immagine: L'orbis Sensualium Pictus Di Jan Amos Comenius. Nuovi annali della scuola speciale per archivisti e bibliotecari, 31, 117-140.

Damiano, E. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell'insegnamento: Per una teoria dell'insegnamento. FrancoAngeli.

Donoghue, G. M., & Hattie, J. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of ten learning techniques. In Frontiers in Education (p. 48). Frontiers.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the public interest, 14(1), 4-58.

Dunning, D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one's own ignorance. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 247-296). Academic Press.

Eco, U. (). Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio, Einaudi, Torino.

Erdoğdu, F., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2021). The educational power of humor on student engagement in online learning environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 1-25

Farnè, R. (2002). Iconologia didattica. Le immagini per l’educazione dall.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717-741.

Freud, S. (2012). Il motto di spirito e la sua relazione con l’inconscio, in Freud: opere 1886-1921, Roma, Newton Compton Editore, pp. 1047-1163.

Friske, A. L. (2018). Memes e matemática: processos de ensino e de aprendizagem guiados pela cyberformação [Memes and math: teaching and learning processes guided by cyberformation]. In Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Meeting of Graduate Students in Mathematics Education (EBRAPEM).

Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College teaching, 54(1), 177-180.

Grice H. P., 1975, “Logic and conversation”, in P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (a cura di), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York (trad. it.:“Logica e conversazione”, in H. P. Grice, Logica e conversazione. Saggi su intenzione,significato e comunicazione, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1993).

Grundlingh, L. (2017). Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020

Halula, S. P. (2013). What role does humor in the higher education classroom play in student-perceived instructor effectiveness?. Marquette University.

Harshavardhan, V., Wilson, D., & Kumar, M. V. (2019). Humour discourse in internet memes: An aid in ESL classrooms. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 29(1), 41-53. http://eventos.sbem.com.br/index.php/EBRAPEM/index/pages/view/anais2018

Kath, L. M., Schmidt, G. B., Islam, S., Jimenez, W. P., & Hartnett, J. L. (2022). Getting Psyched About Memes in the Psychology Classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 00986283221085908.

Kayali, N. K., & Altuntas, A. (2021). Using Memes in the Language Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 155-160.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Landriscina, F. (2012). Didattica delle immagini: dall’informazione ai modelli mentali. Form@ re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 12(80), 27-34.

Maloy, J., Fries, L., Laski, F., & Ramirez, G. (2019). Seductive details in the flipped classroom: The impact of interesting but educationally irrelevant information on student learning and motivation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar4

Matias, Keno Ivan O. "Integration of internet memes in teaching social studies and its relation to the development of critical thinking skills: A literature review." International Journal of Social Science 9, no. 4 (2020): 213-218.

McCabe, C., Sprute, K., & Underdown, K. (2017). Laughter to Learning: How Humor Can Build Relationships and Increase Learning in the Online Classroom. Journal of Instructional Research, 6, 4-7.

McGinty, J., Radin, J., & Kaminski, K. (2013). Brain‐friendly teaching supports learning transfer. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2013(137), 49-59.

Miltner, K. M. (2018). Internet memes. The SAGE handbook of social media, 55, 412-428.

Myrick, J. G., Nabi, R. L., & Eng, N. J. (2021). Consuming memes during the COVID pandemic: Effects of memes and meme type on COVID-related stress and coping efficacy. Psychology of Popular Media.

Mayer, R. E. (2019). How multimedia can improve learning and instruction. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 460–479). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.019

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational technology research and development, 50(3), 43-59.

Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2015). Higher Education Lecturing and Humor: From Perspectives to Strategies. Higher Education Studies, 5(5), 26-31.

Purnama, A. D. (2017). Incorporating memes and instagram to enhance students participation. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 20(1), 1-14.

Reddy, Rishabh, Rishabh Singh, Vidhi Kapoor, and Prathamesh P. Churi. "Joy of Learning Through Internet Memes." Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. 10, no. 5 (2020): 116-133.

Romero, E. D., & Bobkina, J. (2021). Exploring critical and visual literacy needs in digital learning environments: The use of memes in the EFL/ESL university classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100783.

Ryoo, K., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Designing guidance for interpreting dynamic visualizations: Generating versus reading explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(2), 147-174.

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Vol. 142. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Subbiramaniyan, Vivekananth, Chandrashekhar Apte, and Ciraj Ali Mohammed. "A meme-based approach for enhancing student engagement and learning in renal physiology." Advances in physiology education 46, no. 1 (2022): 27-29.

Sundararajan, N., & Adesope, O. (2020). Keep it coherent: a meta-analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Psychology Review, 1-28.

Trinchero, R. (2018). Valutazione formante per l’attivazione cognitiva. Spunti per un uso efficace delle tecnologie per apprendere in classe. Italian Journal of Educational Technology. Doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/1013

Trinchero, Roberto, and Susanna Piacenza. "Un percorso formativo alla comprensione del testo matematico, dai 5 ai 14 anni." Didattica della matematica. Dalla ricerca alle pratiche d’aula 7 (2020): 50-74.

Tsakona, Villy. (2009). Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1171–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003

Vacca, R., DesPortes, K., Tes, M., Silander, M., Amato, A., Matuk, C., & Woods, P. J. (2022). What Do You Meme? Students Communicating their Experiences, Intuitions, and Biases Surrounding Data Through Memes. In Interaction Design and Children. Association for Computing Machinery.

van Leeuwen, Theo. (2015). Multimodality. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton &Deborah Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. 2nd edition (pp. 447–465). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Van, M. (2021). Memes and Math Instruction. Bachelors Thesis. Department Of Cognitive Science University Of California, San Diego. https://cogsci.ucsd.edu/undergraduates/honors-program/Monica-Van_HonorsThesis_-Memes-and-Math-Instruction.pdf

Volli, U. (2005). Manuale di Semiotica, Laterza

Wells, D. D. (2018). You all made dank memes: using internet memes to promote critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(2), 240-248.

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.

Yus, F. (2019). Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach. In Analyzing digital discourse (pp. 105-131). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Zaromb, F. M., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2010). Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: Effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 36(2), 552.



How to Cite

Petrucco, C. (2022). I meme nei processi di insegnamento e apprendimento: una semiotica dell’attivazione cognitiva. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (29), 023–033. https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-022022-p23