The e-tivity as a developmental and widespread teaching practice. A case study in Higher Education

Authors

  • Federica Pelizzari Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
  • Alessandra Carenzio Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-012024-p111

Keywords:

E-tivities, Active Learning, Blended Master Degree, Higher Education, Instructional Design

Abstract

The article examines the introduction and implementation of E-tivities in the design of online activities aimed at active and interactive learning. E-tivities go beyond the simple delivery of online content, aiming to stimulate active and interactive learning by fostering meaningful student participation. The inherent flexibility of E-tivities makes them adaptable to individual and group contexts, providing a personalized learning experience.
The paper presents a study conducted on 20 students, analyzing the interaction modes and perceptions of E-tivities as learning devices. Two guiding questions are highlighted: how to optimize the structure of E-tivities and what is the student's perception of these activities. The research is designed as a pilot case study and takes place in the context of a Blended Master's degree course.
The results and discussion highlight critical aspects of the design of E-tivities, including the importance of feedback, the structure of the activities, the time required, and students' self-perception.

References

Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e‐tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922-935.

Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 550-585.

Carenzio, A. Raviolo, P., & Triacca, S. (2023). Gli EAS nell’Higher Education e per il Faculty Development. In Rivoltella, P. C. (Ed.). Gli EAS tra didattica e pedagogia di scuola. Il metodo, la ricerca. Brescia: Scholé.

Carenzio, A., & Pelizzari, F. (2023). Gamification e narrazione: analisi di un caso. In Mancini, R., & Rondonotti, M. (eds), Oltre la didattica: esperienze, narrazioni e pratiche digitali. Città di Castello: Studium.

Dempsey, M., & Brennan, A. (2018). Re-boot learning: providing an e-tivity scaffold for engagement for early research activity through blog technology embedded within teaching and learning. In INTED2018 Proceedings (pp. 7046-7052). IATED.

Moglie, M., Simoncini, M., Mancini, E., Suraci, V., & Arnesano, M. (2019, September). eLearning Course Design in Higher Education to Maximize Students’ Performance. In Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online: First International Workshop, HELMeTO 2019.

Muirhead, B. (2005). Salmon’s e-tivities: the key to active online learning. Insights for Teachers and Students, 26.

Pavey, J., & Garland, S. W. (2004). The integration and implementation of a range of ‘e‐tivities’ to enhance students' interaction and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 305-315.

Pettenati, M. C., & Cigognini, M. E. (2009). Designing e-tivities to increase learning-to-learn abilities. Elearning Papers, 12.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2023). Fare didattica con gli EAS. Episodi di Apprendimento Situato. Brescia: La Scuola.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2021). Nuovi alfabeti. Educazione e culture nella società post-mediale. Brescia: Scholé.

Salmon, G. (2003). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Routledge.

Salmon, G. (2012). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. London: Routledge.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Pelizzari, F., & Carenzio, A. (2024). The e-tivity as a developmental and widespread teaching practice. A case study in Higher Education. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (32), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-012024-p111

Issue

Section

Experience

Categories