Validazione italiana dell’Academic Behavioural Confidence Scale con studenti di Scienze della Formazione Primaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-012023-p96Parole chiave:
Academic Behavioural Confidence; Auto-efficacia; Higher Education; Validazione; CulturaAbstract
L’academic behavioural confidence (fiducia nel comportamento accademico) rappresenta una variante dell’auto-efficacia e fa riferimento alle credenze e alle aspettative degli studenti in merito alle loro capacità di rispondere adeguatamente alle richieste poste dallo studio universitario (Sander & Sanders, 2009; Putwain & Sander, 2016). Questo costrutto risulta associato a diversi outcome positivi per gli studenti, come l’adozione di strategie di coping efficaci nella vita universitaria e i risultati accademici. Costituisce peraltro una delle dimensioni su cui le università hanno la possibilità di intervenire al fine di ridurre l’abbandono universitario e favorire il successo accademico. Lo scopo del presente studio è quello di validare la scala Academic Behavioural Confidence (ABC) messa a punto da Sander e Sanders (2003, 2006, 2009). La versione italiana è stata somministrata a un campione di 1141 studenti italiani del corso magistrale a ciclo unico in Scienze della Formazione Primaria. A partire dall’analisi della letteratura, sono stati testati diversi modelli alternativi. L’analisi fattoriale ha mostrato una struttura a tre fattori che si discosta da quella originaria. I tre fattori (“Grades-Studying”, “Verbalizing” e “Attendance”) sono risultati significativamente associati con la performance accademica e con le possibili motivazioni che inducono gli studenti a rimanere indietro con gli esami. Le differenze tra la soluzione emersa e il modello fattoriale originale vengono discusse a partire da una prospettiva teorica e culturale.
Riferimenti bibliografici
References
Aina, C., Baici, E., Casalone, G., & Pastore, F. (2022). The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101102.
Altermatt, E. R. (2019). Academic support from peers as a predictor of academic self-efficacy among college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(1), 21-37.
American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Available at https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf. Last accessed February 26, 2023.
Arjanggi, R., Hart, H., Adnjani, M. D., & Sholihah, H. (2020). Validating the behavioral academic confidence scale for Indonesia college students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(12), 688-700.
Azila-Gbettor, E. M., & Abiemo, M. K. (2021). Moderating effect of perceived lecturer support on academic self-efficacy and study engagement: evidence from a Ghanaian university. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 991-1006.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E.M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.
Brunner, M., Keller, U., Hornung, C., Reichert, M., & Martin, R. (2009). The cross-cultural generalizability of a new structural model of academic self-concepts. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 387-403.
Cassady, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20 (3), 307-322.
Chemers, M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.55.
Coates, H. (2005). The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.
Colombo, M., & Barabanti, P. (2020). Female Hegemony among Italian Educational Professionals, In M. Colombo & L. Salmieri (Eds.), The Education of Gender. The Gender of Education. Sociological research in Italy (pp. 43-60). Roma: Associazione “Per Scuola Democratica”.
Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Watson, M. B. (2002). Cross-cultural equivalence of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale—Short form: An Australian and South African comparison. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 327–342.
de la Fuente, J., Sander, P., & Putwain, D. (2013). Relationship between undergraduate student confidence, approach to learning and academic performance: The role of gender. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 18(2), 375-393.
de la Fuente, J., Zapata, L., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., Sander, P., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2015). The role of personal self-regulation and regulatory teaching to predict motivational-affective variables, achievement, and satisfaction: A structural model. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441.
European Commission (2015). Dropout and Completion in Higher Education in Europe: Main Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved February 18, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/826962
European Commission (2020). Education and Training Monitor 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved February 18, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/739096
Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and individual differences, 19(4), 499-505.
Gebauer, M. M., McElvany, N., Köller, O., & Schöber, C. (2021). Cross-cultural differences in academic self-efficacy and its sources across socialization contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 24(6), 1407-1432.
Greco, A., Annovazzi, C., Palena, N., Camussi, E., Rossi, G., & Steca, P. (2022). Self-efficacy beliefs of university students: examining factor validity and measurement invariance of the new academic self-efficacy scale. Frontiers in psychology, 6120.
Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC medical education, 20(1), 1-11.
Hill, K. (2017). Food for Thought: An exploration of the relationship of Academic Confidence to Academic Sustenance in Australian undergraduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).
Hlalele, D. (2012). Academic Behavioural Confidence of First-entering Mathematics and Science University Access Program Students. The Anthropologist, 14(6), 587-592.
Hlalele, D., & Alexander, G. (2011). Academic behavioural confidence of first-entering Humanities University Access Program students. Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 203-209.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1).
Kanizsa, S., & Gelati, M. (Eds.) (2010). 10 anni dell’Università dei maestri. Parma: Junior.
Kehm, B. M., Larsen, M. R., & Sommersel, H. B. (2019). Student dropout from universities in Europe: A review of empirical literature. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147-164.
Kirikkanat, B., & Kali Soyer, M. (2015). The academic behavioral confidence scale: The adaptation study with Turkish undergraduates. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 1 (30), 11-20.
Kirikkanat, B., & Soyer, M. K. (2018). A path analysis model pertinent to undergraduates’ academic success: Examining academic confidence, psychological capital and academic coping factors. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 133-150.
Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205-230.
Kristjansson, E. A., Desrochers, A., & Zumbo, B. (2003). Designer's Corner-Translating and Adapting Measurement Instruments for Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Research: A Guide for Practitioners. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 127-142.
Larsen, M. S., Korbeck, K. P., Kristensen, R. M., Larsen, M. R., & Sommersel, H. B. (2013). Dropout phenomena at universities: What is dropout? Why does dropout occur? What can be done by universities to prevent or reduce it? Copenhagen: Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research.
Liu, MJ., Cheng, YY., Chen, YT. (2022). Academic Self-efficacy in a Globalized Era: Impacts of Culture and Cross-Culture. In M.S. Khine & T. Nielsen, T. (Eds.), Academic Self-efficacy in Education. Springer: Singapore.
Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., Brown, A. C., & Elbedour, S. (2000). Cultural influences on confidence: Country and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 152–159.
Mackie, S. (2001). Jumping the hurdles: Understanding student withdrawal behaviour. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 265-275.
Maguire, A., O'Sullivan, K., & O'Mullane, J. (2014). Examining the Factor Structure in the Academic Behavioural Confidence Scale of Taught Postgraduate Students in an Irish University. CASI, 45.
Matoti, S. N., & Junquiera, K. E. (2009). Assessing the academic behavioural confidence (ABC) of first-year students at the Central University of Technology, Free State. Interim: Interdisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 41-60.
Morelli, M., Chirumbolo, A., Baiocco, R., & Cattelino, E. (2021). Academic failure: individual, organizational, and social factors. Psicología Educativa, 27(2), 167-175.
Mortari, L., & Silva, R. (2020). Teacher Education in Italy. In K. Pushpanadham (Ed.), Teacher Education in the Global Era: Perspectives and Practices (pp. 115-132). Singapore: Springer.
Nicholson, L., Putwain, D., Connors, L., & Hornby-Atkinson, P. (2013). The key to successful achievement as an undergraduate student: confidence and realistic expectations?. Studies in higher education, 38(2), 285-298.
Ochoa, A. R. Á., & Sander, P. (2012). Contrasting academic behavioural confidence in Mexican and European psychology students. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 10(27), 813-838.
OECD (2009). Highlights from Education at a Glance 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Perchinunno, P., Bilancia, M., & Vitale, D. (2021). A statistical analysis of factors affecting higher education dropouts. Social Indicators Research, 156, 341-362.
Prat‐Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self‐efficacy, and approaches to studying. British journal of educational psychology, 80(2), 283-305.
Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self‐efficacy in study‐related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning‐related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633-650.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 130(2), 261-288.
Sander, P. (2004). Increasing student numbers: Diminishing tutor insight? Psychology Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 15-21.
Sander, P. (2009). Current developments in measuring academic behavioural confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 15(1), 32–44.
Sander P., & Sanders, L. (2003). Measuring confidence in academic study: A summary report. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy, 1(1), 1-17.
Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2006). Understanding academic confidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 12(1), 29-39.
Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2009). Measuring academic behavioural confidence: The ABC Scale revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 7(1), 19-35.
Sander, P., de La Fuente, J., Stevenson, K., & Jones, T. (2011). A validation of the academic behavioural confidence scale with Spanish psychology students. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 11-24.
Sander, P., & de la Fuente, J. (2020). Modelling students’ academic confidence, personality and academic emotions. Current Psychology, 41, 4329-4340.
Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., & Coates, D. (2000). University students' expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher education, 25(3), 309-323.
Sanders, L. D., Mair, C., & James, R. (2016). Detecting uncertainty, predicting outcome for first year students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(3), 346-359.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 1-2.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85-104). London, UK: Guildford Press.
Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Living and working in a changing world. London: Sage.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2005). Conceptual and methodological issues in adapting tests. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 39-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumWalker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12.
Wei, Y., Shi, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2022). Exploring the factors that influence college students’ academic self-efficacy in blended learning: a study from the personal, interpersonal, and environmental perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221104815.
World Medical Association. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373-374.
Zanniello, G. (2008). La formazione universitaria degli insegnanti della scuola primaria e dell’infanzia. L’integrazione del sapere, del saper essere e del saper fare. Roma: Armando Editore.
Zlata, V. B. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of factor structures of self-confidence of different groups of students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 86, 482-486.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Valentina Pagani, Stefano Delbosq
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell’opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons – Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l’opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell’opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell’opera pubblicata (Vedi The Effect of Open Access).