L'educazione alle competenze digitali in contesti educativi non-formali: pratiche pedagogiche, apprendimenti e inclusività nei workshop di coding e robotica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-012023-p54Parole chiave:
non-formal education, coding, robotics, digital skills, inclusionAbstract
Riferimenti bibliografici
Azevedo, R. (2005). Computers as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197.
Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.), (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system Reform. Center for Strategic Education (CSE), Melbourne. URL: http://www.edsource.org/today/wp-content/uploads/Fullan-Wrong-Drivers1.pdf (accessed on 25th May 2020).
Baber, L. D. (2015). Considering the interest-convergence dilemma in STEM education. The Review of Higher Education, 38(2), 251-270.
Bertolini, P. (1988). L'esistere pedagogico. Ragioni e limiti di una pedagogia come scienza fenomenologicamente fondata. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
Besozzi, E. (2006). Educazione e società. Roma: Carrocci.
Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11-22.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington (VA): NSTA Press.
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. New York (NY): Springer.
Chesloff, J. D. (2013). STEM education must start in early childhood. Education Week, 32(23), 27–32
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Eccles, J. S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116-132.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5-24.
Eshach, H. 2007. Bridging In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-formal, and Informal Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
European Commission (2018). 2018 International Digital Economy and Society Index. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/international-digital-economy-and-society-index-2018.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
Giovannini, G. (1987). I molti tempi, luoghi, attori della formazione: un'analisi del policentrismo a partire dall'offerta. Studi di Sociologia, 25(1), 3-17.
Gordon, D. (1982). The concept of the hidden curriculum. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 16(2), 187-98.
Ito, M., Arum, R., Conely, D., Gutiérrez, K., Kirschner, B., Livingstone, S., ... & Watkins, C. S. (2020). The connected learning research network: Reflections on a decade of engaged scholarship. Connected Learning Alliance.
Jackson, N. (2012). Lifewide Learning: history of an idea. In: Jackson N., & Cooper, B. (Eds.) Lifewide Learning, Education & Personal Development (pp. 1-30). E-Book available at: https://www.lifewideeducation.uk/lifewide-learning-education--personal-development.html
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D., & Burke, W. Q. (2012). Entering the clubhouse: Case studies of young programmers joining the online Scratch communities. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 22(1), 21-35.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York (NY): New York University Press.
Mehta, R., Creely, E., & Henriksen, D. (2020). A profitable education: Countering neoliberalism in 21st century skills discourses. In Kengwee J., & Onchwari G., Handbook of research on literacy and digital technology integration in teacher education (pp. 359-381). Hershey (PA): IGI Global.
Merkouris, A., Chorianopoulos, K., & Kameas, A. (2017). Teaching programming in secondary education through embodied computing platforms: Robotics and wearables. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(2), 1-22.
Reischmann, J. (1986) Learning 'en passant': The Forgotten Dimension. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Adult and Continuing Education, Hollywood, FL, USA, 1-7. Available at: http://www.reischmannfam.de/lit/1986-AAACE-Hollywood.pdf
Saldaña (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Sefton-Green, J. (2012). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Sheridan I., Goggin, D., O’Sullivan L. (2016). Exploration of learning gained through CoderDojo coding activities. Inted2016 Proceedings, pp. 6541-6548.
Tisza, G., Papavlasopoulou, S., Christidou, D., Iivari, N., Kinnula, M., & Voulgari, I. (2020). Patterns in informal and non-formal science learning activities for children – A Europe-wide survey study. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 25, pp. 1-11.
Tisza, G., Papavlasopoulou, S., Christidou, D.,Voulgari, I., Iivari, N., Giannakos, M.N., Kinnula, M., & Markopoulos, P. (2019). The role of age and gender on implementing informal and non-formal science learning activities for children. In Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference (FabLearn Europe '19). Association for Computing Machinery. Article 10, pp. 1–9.
Tramma, S. (2009). Che cos' è l'educazione informale. Roma: Carocci.
Turan, S., & Aydoğdu, F. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4353-4363.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston (MA): Harvard University Press.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. Review of research in education, 23(1), 73-118.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Davide Cino, Silke Brandsen, Nathalie Bressa, Eva Eriksson, Giovanna Mascheroni, Bieke Zaman
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell’opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons – Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l’opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell’opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell’opera pubblicata (Vedi The Effect of Open Access).