Describing teaching practices in text comprehension: an exploratory study

Authors

  • Chiara Bertolini Full Professor | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Lucia Scipione Researcher | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Agnese Vezzani Research Fellow | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7347/EdL-01-2025-02

Keywords:

In-service training, Self-efficacy, Reading comprehension, Teacher professional development-research, Learning to learn

Abstract

The transformation of teaching practices is the outcome of a prolonged and complex process that necessitates continuous professional development. Its primary aim is to enhance educators’ awareness of the often implicit decisions embedded in instructional planning, while fostering critical reflection on the multifaceted nature of their professional roles. Text comprehension, a naturally transversal and multi-component skill, and the teaching methods that support it, particularly expose teachers to the risk of not clearly identifying objectives and suitable methods and consequently failing to concretely guide practices. This study explores the outcomes of a questionnaire administered at the initial stage of a teacher professional development-research aimed at improving text comprehension, to better understand the teaching habits and self-efficacy perceptions of a group of 25 fourth-grade primary school teachers, and, consequently, to identify their training needs. The survey instrument included items from an Italian adaptation of the Tsachennen-Moran scale, also known as the Ohio scale, and open-ended questions through which teachers described the text comprehension activities commonly carried out in the classroom. Teachers' responses revealed heterogeneity in practices, some difficulty in describing the objectives and strategies implemented in text comprehension activities, and modest self-efficacy, particularly regarding the ability to propose challenging activities for the most capable students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrusti, G., & Dodman, M. (2021). Evaluating the impact of “Ricerca-Formazione” on teachers’ professional development. Methodological issues and operational models. RicercAzione, 13(2), 75-84.

Altricher, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the method of action research. Routledge.

Asquini, G. (Ed.). (2018). La Ricerca-Formazione: Temi, esperienze e prospettive. FrancoAngeli.

Baron, N. S. (2022). Come leggere: carta, schermo o audio? Raffaello Cortina Editore.

Batini, F. (2018). Leggimi ancora. Lettura ad alta voce e Life skills. Florence, Giunti.

Batini, F., Brizioli, I., Mancini, A., Susta, M., & Scierri, I. D. M. (2021). Lettura e comprensione: una revisione sistematica della letteratura. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 16(1), 79-86.

Cardarello, R., & Anonymous, C. (2020).

Cardarello, R., Anonymous, C., Antonietti, M., Pintus, A. and Anonymous, L. (2017)

Cardarello, R., & Pintus, A. (2018). Insegnare la comprensione a scuola. Un percorso didattico sperimentale centrato sui testi e sul confronto “tra pari”. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 11(21), 189-204.

Cardarello, R., & Pintus, A. (2019). La comprensione del testo nella scuola italiana: un bilancio storico e critico. In Strategie efficaci per la comprensione del testo. Il Reciprocal Teaching, 47-75.

Cardarello, R., & Anonymous, L. (2023).

De Coster, I., Baidak, N., Motiejunaite, A., & Noorani, S. (2011). Teaching reading in Europe: contexts, policies and practices. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, European Commission. Available from EU Bookshop.

Consiglio dell’Unione Europea, Raccomandazione 2018/C 189/01, 22 maggio 2018 relativa alle competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)

Dodman, M., Cardarello, R., Damiani, V., & Ciani, A. (2025). La Ricerca-Formazione: Impatti, strumenti, fattori. Milano: Franco Angeli open access.

Gove, M. K. (1983). Clarifying teachers' beliefs about reading. The Reading Teacher, 37(3), 261-268.

Palmerio, L., & Emiletti, M. (2024). Indagine internazionale IEA PIRLS 2021: i risultati in lettura degli studenti italiani di quarta primaria, Milano: Franco Angeli open access (risultati reperibili anche al https://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/pirls2021/documenti/RappNaz/PIRLS2021_SintesiRis.pdf

Lastrucci, E. (2019). Insegnare a comprendere. Anicia.

Lumbelli, L. (2009). La comprensione come problema. Il punto di vista cognitivo. Laterza.

Marcuccio, M. (2015). La formazione degli insegnanti a una didattica dell’imparare a imparare. Tra scelte per l’innovazione ed elementi di problematicità. Italian Journal of Educational Research, (14), 13-34.

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca. (2012). Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo della scuola dell'infanzia e del primo ciclo d'istruzione. Decreto Ministeriale 16 novembre 2012, n. 254.

Pintus, A. (2021). Problemi aperti e modalità di pensiero degli insegnanti in formazione e in servizio. In Ricerca e Didattica per promuovere intelligenza, comprensione e partecipazione. I tomo (pp. 133-140). Pensa Multimedia.

Pintus, A., Anonymous, C., Anonymous, L., & Antonietti, M. (2021)

Stringher, C. (2021). Apprendere ad apprendere in prospettiva socio-culturale. Rappresentazioni dei docenti in sei paesi, Milano: Franco Angeli open access (Tr. Learning how to learn in a socio-cultural perspective. Teachers’ representations in six countries).

Schon, D. A. (2024). Il professionista riflessivo: per una nuova epistemologia della pratica professionale. Edizioni Dedalo.

Song, J. H., Martens, J., McCharen, B., & Ausburn, L. (2011). Multi-structural relationships among organizational culture, job autonomy, and CTE teacher turnover intention. Career and Technical Education Research, 36(1), 3-26.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of educational psychology, 99 (3), 611.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17 (7), 783-805.

Anonymous, A., Anonymous, L., & Anonymous, C. (2025)

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Bertolini, C., Scipione, L., & Vezzani, A. (2025). Describing teaching practices in text comprehension: an exploratory study. Effetti Di Lettura / Effects of Reading, 4(1), 019–034. https://doi.org/10.7347/EdL-01-2025-02

Issue

Section

Articoli