Reading Aloud Practices in Schools: Teacher Self-Efficacy, School Climate, and Teacher training

Authors

  • Chiara Pastore Università degli Studi Link Roma
  • Elisabetta Faraoni Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Psicologiche, della Comunicazione, della Formazione e Motorie; Università degli Studi Niccolò Cusano; elisabetta.faraoni@unicusano.it
  • Francesco Maria Melchiori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7347/EdL-01-2026-01

Keywords:

reading aloud, teacher self-efficacy, school inclusion, reading education, teacher training

Abstract

This study investigates the individual and organizational determinants of reading aloud practices in schools, focusing on teacher self-efficacy, inclusive school climate, and professional development in reading education. A cross-sectional quantitative design was adopted on a large sample of 2,150 Italian teachers. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

The results highlight a clear distinction between the individual and organizational dimensions of reading practices. At the individual level, prior training emerged as the strongest predictor (β = .387, p < .001), followed by school climate (β = .191, p < .001) and teacher self-efficacy (β = .123; β = .056). At the organizational level, inclusive school climate emerged as the most relevant predictor of collaborative practices (β = .529, p < .001), while teacher self-efficacy was not statistically significant at conventional levels.

Training appears as the only variable influencing both dimensions, acting as a bridge between individual action and organizational culture. Furthermore, library use is associated with the activation of services rather than mere availability.

The study highlights the need for a systemic approach to reading education, based on the interaction between teacher training, school climate, and organizational conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ainscow, M. (2016). Collaboration as a strategy for promoting equity in education: Possibilities and barriers. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(2), 159–172.

Albright, L. K., & Ariail, M. (2005). Tapping the potential of teacher read-alouds in middle schools. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(7), 582–591.

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Computing the strictly positive Satorra-Bentler chi-square test in Mplus (Mplus Web Notes No. 12). Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/SB5.pdf

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.

Batini, F. (2019). Leggere ad alta voce: Metodi e strategie per costruire competenze per la vita. Giunti.

Batini, F., & Corsini, C. (Eds.). (2025). Aloud! Against early school leaving: Effetti equitativi della lettura ad alta voce condivisa nelle scuole secondarie di primo grado. FrancoAngeli.

Batini, F., & Giusti, S. (Eds.). (2021). Tecniche per la lettura ad alta voce: 27 suggerimenti per la fascia 0–6 anni. FrancoAngeli.

Batini, F., & Giusti, S. (Eds.). (2022). Strategie e tecniche per leggere ad alta voce a scuola. FrancoAngeli.

Biasi, V., Domenici, G., Patrizi, N., & Capobianco, R. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy scale (Scala sull’auto-efficacia del docente – SAED): Adattamento e validazione in Italia. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 10, 485–509. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-bias

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2008). L’Index per l’inclusione: Promuovere l’apprendimento e la partecipazione nella scuola (F. Dovigo & D. Ianes, Eds.). Erickson.

Chimá-López, F. D. J., & Padilla-Pérez, A. R. (2018). Efectos de la lectura en voz alta en la comprensión lectora de estudiantes de primaria. Encuentros, 16(1), 11–22.

Cova, Y. (2004). La práctica de la lectura en voz alta en el hogar y en la escuela a favor de niños y niñas. Sapiens. Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 5(2), 53–66.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Donohoo, J., Hattie, J., & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40–44.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T. W., & Mattos, M. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

Duke, N. K. (2013). Starting out: Practices to use in K–3. Educational Leadership, 71(3), 40–44.

Fisher, D., Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Frey, N. (2004). Interactive read-alouds: Is there a common set of implementation practices? The Reading Teacher, 58(1), 8–17.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238

Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Izzo, D., Ciurnelli, B., & Carlotti, E. (2024). Promozione della lettura o educazione alla lettura? Le scelte educative delle scuole e le loro conseguenze. Effetti di Lettura / Effects of Reading, 3(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.7347/EdL-01-2024-02

Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236

Kozak, S., & Recchia, H. (2019). Reading and the development of social understanding: Implications for the literacy classroom. The Reading Teacher, 72(5), 569–577.

Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.

Lane, H. B., & Wright, T. L. (2007). Maximizing the effectiveness of reading aloud. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 668–675.

Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

Morrison, V., & Wlodarczyk, L. (2009). Revisiting read-aloud: Instructional strategies that encourage students’ engagement with texts. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 110–118.

Scierri, I. D. M. (2024). Validazione italiana della scala di autoefficacia dell’insegnante per implementare l’apprendimento autoregolato (AI-AA). Italian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-012024-p32

Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Research, 45(1–3), 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729

Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Ministry of Education.

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Pastore, C., Faraoni, E., & Melchiori, F. M. (2026). Reading Aloud Practices in Schools: Teacher Self-Efficacy, School Climate, and Teacher training. Effetti Di Lettura / Effects of Reading, 5(1), 005–022. https://doi.org/10.7347/EdL-01-2026-01

Issue

Section

Articoli