Editorial Team

 

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Federico Batini, Department of Philosophy, Social, Human and Educational Sciences, University of Perugia, IT - federico.batini@unipg.it

EDITORIAL BOARD

Managing Editors:

Maria Ermelinda De Carlo, Università Telematica Pegaso, IT - ermedecarlo@gmail.com

Irene Dora Maria Scierri, Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, IT - irene.scierri@unifi.it

 

Editorial staff:

Giulia Barbisoni, Department of Philosophy, Social, Human and Educational Sciences, University of Perugia, IT - giulia.barbisoni@collaboratori.unipg.it

Benedetta D'Autilia, Department of Education Studies “Giovanni Maria Bertin”, University of Bologna, IT - benedetta.dautilia2@unibo.it

Conny De Vincenzo, Department of Education Science, University of Rome 3, IT - conny.devincenzo@uniroma3.it

Giulia Toti, Department of Human Studies, LUMSA University, IT - g.toti1.dottorati@lumsa.it

 

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE

Federico Batini, University of Perugia, IT.

Chiara Bertolini, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, IT.

Cristina Caracchini, Western University, CA.

Roberta Cardarello, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, IT.

Emanuele Castano, University of Trento, IT.

Cristiano Corsini, University of Rome 3, IT.

Fabio D’Andrea, University of Perugia, IT.

Nicola Genga, Cepell, IT.

Simone Giusti, University of Siena, IT.

Andrea Lombardinilo, 'Gabriele D'Annunzio' University, IT.

Giovanni Moretti, University of Rome 3, IT.

Michèle Petit, CNRS, FR.

Patrizia Sposetti, Sapienza University of Rome, IT.

Giordana Szpunar, Sapienza University of Rome, IT.

 

LIST OF REFEREES

The Referee Committee includes scholars of recognised competence from Italy and elsewhere. The Managing Editors are responsible for the refereeing procedure. However, The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the final decisions regarding initial checks and acceptance of manuscripts. Effetti di Lettura / Effects of Reading at the end of each year thanks the experts who made themselves available for the peer review of the articles. Their comments and suggestions are of great help to authors in improving the quality of their work. Each of the listed reviewers returned at least one review.