%PDF-1.4
%
5 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
.236 .028 .275 .128 k
/GS2 gs
.89595 0 451.917 31.546 re
f
Q
q
1 i
114.67 220.768 m
59.419 220.768 l
59.688 230.651 60.497 240.084 61.845 249.068 c
62.923 258.051 64.54 266.137 66.965 272.875 c
69.391 279.613 72.356 285.452 76.398 289.495 c
80.441 293.538 85.293 295.334 91.491 295.334 c
94.995 295.334 98.229 294.436 101.194 293.088 c
104.159 291.292 106.584 288.596 108.74 284.554 c
110.627 280.511 112.244 275.57 113.592 268.832 c
114.67 262.094 115.209 254.009 115.209 243.677 c
115.209 232.447 l
115.209 228.854 114.939 224.811 114.67 220.768 c
h
59.149 214.48 m
142.161 214.48 l
142.161 231.1 140.543 244.576 137.309 255.805 c
133.806 267.035 129.763 276.019 124.911 282.757 c
119.791 289.495 114.4 293.987 108.74 297.131 c
103.081 300.276 97.69 301.623 92.569 301.623 c
84.214 301.623 76.129 298.928 68.852 293.088 c
61.575 287.249 55.107 279.163 49.716 269.73 c
44.056 260.297 39.744 249.068 36.78 236.939 c
33.545 224.362 31.928 211.335 31.928 198.309 c
31.928 183.036 33.545 169.111 36.51 156.983 c
39.475 144.406 43.787 133.625 49.447 124.641 c
55.107 115.657 61.575 108.919 69.391 103.978 c
76.938 99.037 85.293 96.791 94.187 96.791 c
103.081 96.791 110.627 99.037 116.287 103.978 c
121.947 108.47 126.259 113.861 129.763 120.149 c
132.997 125.989 135.423 132.278 137.04 138.566 c
138.387 144.406 139.465 149.347 140.004 152.491 c
135.962 153.839 l
135.153 150.245 134.345 145.304 132.727 139.914 c
131.38 134.074 129.224 128.684 126.259 123.294 c
123.294 117.454 119.252 112.962 114.131 108.919 c
109.01 104.877 102.272 103.08 94.456 103.08 c
86.64 103.08 80.172 105.775 75.59 111.615 c
70.739 117.454 67.235 124.641 64.809 133.176 c
62.384 141.711 60.767 151.593 59.958 162.373 c
59.149 173.154 58.88 183.485 58.88 193.368 c
58.88 202.801 59.149 208.64 59.149 214.48 c
h
154.532 103.122 m
W n
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
.024 .095 .097 .017 k
/GS2 gs
31.92 96.834 110.223 204.829 re
f
Q
q
1 i
208.38 386.97 m
208.38 408.082 216.465 423.354 225.898 423.354 c
240.183 423.354 245.573 404.937 245.573 384.724 c
245.573 376.638 244.764 369.451 243.417 363.612 c
242.069 357.772 240.183 352.382 238.026 347.89 c
235.601 343.398 233.175 339.355 230.211 336.211 c
227.246 333.067 224.281 329.473 221.047 326.778 c
214.579 348.339 208.38 371.248 208.38 386.97 c
h
198.677 304.318 m
251.233 136.32 l
241.261 120.599 229.941 108.919 217.004 108.919 c
211.075 108.919 205.145 112.962 199.486 121.048 c
193.556 128.684 188.166 139.015 183.584 151.144 c
179.002 163.272 175.229 177.197 172.264 192.02 c
169.3 206.843 167.952 220.768 167.952 234.244 c
167.952 268.832 180.08 288.147 198.677 304.318 c
h
269.29 172.256 m
222.395 321.388 l
225.359 324.083 228.324 327.227 231.558 330.821 c
234.792 334.414 237.757 338.906 240.452 343.847 c
242.878 348.788 245.034 355.077 246.921 361.815 c
248.538 368.553 249.346 376.189 249.346 385.173 c
249.346 415.718 238.566 429.643 224.82 429.643 c
220.238 429.643 215.926 428.295 211.614 425.151 c
207.032 422.007 203.259 417.964 199.755 412.124 c
196.251 406.285 193.556 399.547 191.4 391.911 c
189.244 383.825 188.166 374.841 188.166 364.51 c
188.166 339.355 193.017 322.286 197.06 309.259 c
191.4 303.869 185.471 298.03 179.272 291.292 c
173.073 284.554 167.683 276.918 162.562 268.383 c
157.441 259.399 153.129 249.068 149.895 237.389 c
146.391 225.71 144.774 212.234 144.774 196.512 c
144.774 188.427 145.852 178.544 147.738 167.315 c
149.625 155.636 153.129 144.855 157.98 134.523 c
162.562 124.192 168.761 115.208 176.577 108.021 c
184.393 100.385 193.826 96.791 205.145 96.791 c
210.805 96.791 215.926 97.69 220.777 99.936 c
225.629 102.182 230.211 105.326 234.253 108.47 c
238.296 111.615 241.8 115.208 245.034 119.251 c
248.268 123.294 250.963 126.887 253.119 130.481 c
255.276 124.641 257.162 119.7 259.049 115.657 c
260.935 111.615 262.822 108.021 264.978 105.326 c
266.865 102.182 269.29 99.936 271.986 98.588 c
274.681 97.24 277.915 96.791 281.688 96.791 c
285.192 96.791 288.696 97.69 292.469 99.936 c
296.242 102.182 299.746 105.775 302.71 110.716 c
305.675 115.657 308.101 122.395 309.987 130.93 c
311.874 139.015 312.952 149.347 312.952 161.924 c
309.179 161.924 l
309.179 156.983 308.909 152.491 308.64 147.55 c
308.37 142.609 307.562 137.668 306.753 133.625 c
305.945 129.582 304.597 125.989 302.98 123.294 c
301.093 120.599 298.937 119.251 295.973 119.251 c
286.539 119.251 280.61 136.769 271.177 165.518 c
273.603 172.256 275.759 179.443 277.645 186.63 c
279.532 193.368 281.149 201.004 282.497 209.089 c
283.844 216.726 284.653 225.71 285.461 235.143 c
286.27 244.576 286.539 255.805 286.539 267.934 c
286.539 277.816 286.809 286.351 287.348 293.538 c
287.618 300.276 288.696 306.115 290.313 310.607 c
291.66 315.099 293.816 318.243 296.781 320.489 c
299.746 322.735 303.519 323.634 308.101 323.634 c
308.101 329.922 l
256.893 329.922 l
256.893 323.634 l
262.013 323.634 266.056 323.184 269.56 321.837 c
272.794 320.489 275.489 317.345 277.376 312.853 c
279.263 308.361 280.88 302.072 281.688 293.538 c
282.497 285.003 282.766 273.324 282.766 258.95 c
282.766 230.201 279.802 201.453 269.29 172.256 c
h
334.246 103.122 m
W n
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
.118 .014 .138 .064 k
/GS2 gs
144.786 96.834 168.174 298.65 re
f
Q
q
1 i
424.524 152.491 m
420.482 153.839 l
419.673 150.245 418.865 145.304 417.247 139.914 c
415.9 134.074 413.744 128.684 410.779 123.294 c
407.814 117.454 403.772 112.962 398.651 108.919 c
393.53 104.877 386.792 103.08 378.976 103.08 c
371.699 103.08 365.77 105.775 361.188 110.716 c
356.606 115.657 352.833 122.395 350.407 130.93 c
347.712 139.465 345.826 149.347 345.017 160.577 c
343.939 171.806 343.4 183.935 343.4 196.961 c
343.4 219.87 344.478 237.838 346.904 250.864 c
349.06 263.891 352.024 273.773 355.528 280.511 c
359.032 287.249 362.805 291.292 367.117 293.088 c
371.16 294.436 375.203 295.334 379.246 295.334 c
390.026 295.334 399.729 287.698 399.729 273.773 c
399.729 266.137 395.956 252.212 395.956 243.677 c
395.956 232.897 402.694 228.854 408.892 228.854 c
417.786 228.854 422.907 237.838 422.907 250.415 c
422.907 259.848 421.56 267.484 418.865 274.222 c
415.9 280.511 412.396 285.901 408.353 289.944 c
404.041 293.987 399.459 296.682 394.339 298.928 c
389.218 300.725 384.097 301.623 379.246 301.623 c
370.621 301.623 362.536 298.928 354.989 293.987 c
347.173 288.596 340.705 281.409 335.045 271.976 c
329.385 262.543 324.803 251.763 321.569 239.185 c
318.065 226.608 316.448 213.132 316.448 198.309 c
316.448 179.443 318.335 163.721 322.378 150.694 c
326.151 137.668 331.002 127.336 337.201 119.7 c
343.4 111.615 350.138 105.775 357.415 102.182 c
364.692 98.588 371.969 96.791 378.707 96.791 c
387.601 96.791 395.147 99.037 400.807 103.978 c
406.467 108.47 410.779 113.861 414.283 120.149 c
417.517 125.989 419.943 132.278 421.56 138.566 c
422.907 144.406 423.985 149.347 424.524 152.491 c
h
433.913 103.122 m
W n
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
.024 .095 .097 .017 k
/GS2 gs
316.44 96.834 108.052 204.829 re
f
Q
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
8 0 0 10 114.6375 47.4389 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
.0456 Tc
0 Tw
[(E)14.7(t)12.2(ernity & Con)9.3(tr)22(adiction. Journal of Fundamen)9.3(t)9.8(al On)9.3(t)9.8(ology)]TJ
6.4 0 0 8 330.758 47.4389 Tm
0 Tc
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 172.5914 36.9389 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 199.2047 36.9389 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 203.2594 36.9389 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 229.3376 36.9389 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 233.3923 36.9389 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8 0 0 10 256.2204 36.9389 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021 )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
7.2 0 0 9 121.1352 24.1886 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( ISSN 26127571 P)16.1(ensa MultiMedia DOI: 10.7346/)24.4(e&c04202105)]TJ
ET
.236 .028 .275 .128 k
/GS2 gs
.448 395.484 451.752 47.215 re
f
Q
q
1 i
208.38 386.97 m
208.38 408.082 216.465 423.354 225.898 423.354 c
240.183 423.354 245.573 404.937 245.573 384.724 c
245.573 376.638 244.764 369.451 243.417 363.612 c
242.069 357.772 240.183 352.382 238.026 347.89 c
235.601 343.398 233.175 339.355 230.211 336.211 c
227.246 333.067 224.281 329.473 221.047 326.778 c
214.579 348.339 208.38 371.248 208.38 386.97 c
h
198.677 304.318 m
251.233 136.32 l
241.261 120.599 229.941 108.919 217.004 108.919 c
211.075 108.919 205.145 112.962 199.486 121.048 c
193.556 128.684 188.166 139.015 183.584 151.144 c
179.002 163.272 175.229 177.197 172.264 192.02 c
169.3 206.843 167.952 220.768 167.952 234.244 c
167.952 268.832 180.08 288.147 198.677 304.318 c
h
269.29 172.256 m
222.395 321.388 l
225.359 324.083 228.324 327.227 231.558 330.821 c
234.792 334.414 237.757 338.906 240.452 343.847 c
242.878 348.788 245.034 355.077 246.921 361.815 c
248.538 368.553 249.346 376.189 249.346 385.173 c
249.346 415.718 238.566 429.643 224.82 429.643 c
220.238 429.643 215.926 428.295 211.614 425.151 c
207.032 422.007 203.259 417.964 199.755 412.124 c
196.251 406.285 193.556 399.547 191.4 391.911 c
189.244 383.825 188.166 374.841 188.166 364.51 c
188.166 339.355 193.017 322.286 197.06 309.259 c
191.4 303.869 185.471 298.03 179.272 291.292 c
173.073 284.554 167.683 276.918 162.562 268.383 c
157.441 259.399 153.129 249.068 149.895 237.389 c
146.391 225.71 144.774 212.234 144.774 196.512 c
144.774 188.427 145.852 178.544 147.738 167.315 c
149.625 155.636 153.129 144.855 157.98 134.523 c
162.562 124.192 168.761 115.208 176.577 108.021 c
184.393 100.385 193.826 96.791 205.145 96.791 c
210.805 96.791 215.926 97.69 220.777 99.936 c
225.629 102.182 230.211 105.326 234.253 108.47 c
238.296 111.615 241.8 115.208 245.034 119.251 c
248.268 123.294 250.963 126.887 253.119 130.481 c
255.276 124.641 257.162 119.7 259.049 115.657 c
260.935 111.615 262.822 108.021 264.978 105.326 c
266.865 102.182 269.29 99.936 271.986 98.588 c
274.681 97.24 277.915 96.791 281.688 96.791 c
285.192 96.791 288.696 97.69 292.469 99.936 c
296.242 102.182 299.746 105.775 302.71 110.716 c
305.675 115.657 308.101 122.395 309.987 130.93 c
311.874 139.015 312.952 149.347 312.952 161.924 c
309.179 161.924 l
309.179 156.983 308.909 152.491 308.64 147.55 c
308.37 142.609 307.562 137.668 306.753 133.625 c
305.945 129.582 304.597 125.989 302.98 123.294 c
301.093 120.599 298.937 119.251 295.973 119.251 c
286.539 119.251 280.61 136.769 271.177 165.518 c
273.603 172.256 275.759 179.443 277.645 186.63 c
279.532 193.368 281.149 201.004 282.497 209.089 c
283.844 216.726 284.653 225.71 285.461 235.143 c
286.27 244.576 286.539 255.805 286.539 267.934 c
286.539 277.816 286.809 286.351 287.348 293.538 c
287.618 300.276 288.696 306.115 290.313 310.607 c
291.66 315.099 293.816 318.243 296.781 320.489 c
299.746 322.735 303.519 323.634 308.101 323.634 c
308.101 329.922 l
256.893 329.922 l
256.893 323.634 l
262.013 323.634 266.056 323.184 269.56 321.837 c
272.794 320.489 275.489 317.345 277.376 312.853 c
279.263 308.361 280.88 302.072 281.688 293.538 c
282.497 285.003 282.766 273.324 282.766 258.95 c
282.766 230.201 279.802 201.453 269.29 172.256 c
h
334.246 103.122 m
W n
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
.319 .038 .372 .173 k
/GS2 gs
144.786 395.484 168.174 34.198 re
f
Q
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 413.4872 49.7349 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
(51)Tj
/F5 1 Tf
9 0 0 10 390.0208 439.5825 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
-9.0557 -1.2 TD
.039 Tc
-.0195 Tw
[(FILIPPO)19.5( C)7.3(O)0(S)9.7(T)78.6(ANTINI)19.5( )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
9 0 0 10 103.6904 415.5825 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(Univ)9.8(er)17.1(sit)12.2( Ca F)13.7(osc)8.3(ari di V)49.8(ene)9.8(zia McMas)11.2(t)10.8(er Univ)9.8(er)17.1(sity)71.3(, Hamilt)9.8(on, ON, Canada )]TJ
21.1133 -1.2 TD
[(lippo.c)8.3(os)11.2(t)12.2(a)0(n)9.3(ni@univ)9.8(e.it)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
16.1 0 0 23 86.2484 525.3457 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
[(NO)29.8(THING REALL)69.8(Y MA)69.8(T)-12(TERS )44.9(T)32(O)0( ME )]TJ
-.4265 -1.2 TD
[(A critique of E)5.9(manuele S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( R)12(esolution )]TJ
3.0533 -1.2 TD
[(of the A)12(poria of N)29.8(othingness)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
5.46 0 0 7.8 313.7243 478.1459 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
(1)Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
16.1 0 0 23 316.5101 470.1459 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8 0 0 8 348.3598 617.0746 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0005 Tc
.0005 Tw
[(Second P)19(art)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 56.4397 378.3969 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0001 Tc
.0327 Tw
[(This paper analy)8.2(z)22.4(es and criciz)22.4(es Emanuele Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s r)13.1(esoluon of the aporia of nothing)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0069 Tw
[(ness. Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s soluon c)8.2(onsis)11.1(ts in tw)9.2(o theses: A\) the meaning of nothingness is self)26.8(c)8.2(on)]TJ
T*
.0001 Tc
.0178 Tw
[(tr)20.6(adict)9.9(ory; B\) the de)5.5(t)10.9(ermina)9.4(t)10.9(e).1( c)8.4(o).1(n)9.4(t)10.9(en)9.4(t of the meaning of nothingness is c)8.4(onsis)11.3(t)10.8(e).1(n)9.4(t).1( \(it does )]TJ
T*
-.0001 Tc
.0346 Tw
[(not imply by itself an)18.5(y c)8.2(o)-.1(n)9.2(t)-.1(r)20.4(adicon\). A)10.7(er dis)11.1(nguishing thr)13.1(ee possible in)9.2(t)10.6(erpr)13.1(e)5.3(t)12.1(a)9.2(ons of )]TJ
T*
.0532 Tw
[(the t)10.7(erm nothing)-40.6( \(as a quan)9.2(er)85.8(, as a nounphr)20.4(ase, and as a c)8.2(oncept\), the paper ar)13.6(gues )]TJ
T*
0 Tc
.0503 Tw
[(tha)9.3(t ther)13.2(e is no in)9.3(t)10.8(erpr)13.2(e)5.4(t)12.2(a)9.3(on tha)9.3(t mak)32.2(es both theses A\) and B\) simult)12.2(aneously true. This )]TJ
T*
-.0001 Tc
.0563 Tw
[(show)8.7(s)-.1( tha)9.2(t Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s f)20.9(ormula)9.2(on and r)13.1(esoluon of the pr)16(oblem of nothingness is un)9.2(t)10.6(e)-.1(n)]TJ
T*
.0002 Tw
[(able; mor)13.1(eov)9.7(e)-.1(r)85.8(,)-.1( it is shown tha)9.2(t his r)13.1(esoluon is based on an )]TJ
/F7 1 Tf
24.7362 0 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
(ambiguity)Tj
/F6 1 Tf
4.0889 0 TD
.0001 Tw
[( be)5.4(tw)8.8(een the noun)]TJ
-28.825 -1.14 TD
-.0001 Tc
[(phr)20.4(ase and the c)8.2(oncept in)9.2(t)10.7(erpr)13.1(e)5.3(t)12.1(a)9.2(on. )]TJ
/F5 1 Tf
T*
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 9 202.7745 265.5369 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
[(K)18.1(e)9.3(y)-5.8(w)8.3(or)12.2(ds: )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
9 0 0 9 243.7931 265.5369 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 9 56.4397 255.2769 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0002 Tc
.2071 Tw
[(Absolut)12(e Nothingness, Sev)9.1(erino)14.5(, Carnap, NounPhr)21.8(ases, Quan)9.1(er)12(s, Concepts, Empty )]TJ
T*
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(T)86.4(erms)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 100.0305 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0429 Tw
[(1 )-739.1(I would like to thank C)5.8(ristina P)41.9(agnin and M)11.9(a)0(r)5.9(co S)11.9(imionato for helpful comments on )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(a pr)9.7(evious v)5.8(ersion of this paper)59.7(. )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
6 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 65.1748 501.5149 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(1.)-879.6(In)9.3(tr)12.2(oduction )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 487.4749 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0405 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( this paper I shall analyz)5.9(e and criticiz)5.9(e E)5.9(manuele S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution to )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.4577 0 TD
(aporia)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.361 0 TD
-.0103 Tw
[( of nothingness)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 179.2867 463.115 Tm
0 Tw
(2)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 183.1086 460.115 Tm
-.0103 Tw
[(. )44.9(This r)9.8(esolution is a keystone of S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( phi-)]TJ
-10.027 -1.14 TD
.0148 Tw
[(losophy)84.9(, alr)9.8(eady dev)5.8(eloped in )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
11.6005 0 TD
[(La S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura O)5.8(riginaria)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.9556 0 TD
[( \(1958\))]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
2.9048 0 TD
0 Tw
(. )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.5147 0 TD
.0148 Tw
(The aporia )Tj
-23.9756 -1.14 TD
-.042 Tw
[(r)9.8(egar)13.9(ds the notion of absolute nothingness \()]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
16.6692 0 TD
(nihil absolutum)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.815 0 TD
[(\) interpr)9.8(eted as )]TJ
-22.4842 -1.14 TD
-.0237 Tw
[()39.8(what is absolutely other than being)17.8()]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 227.2556 422.075 Tm
0 Tw
(3)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 231.0775 419.075 Tm
-.0237 Tw
[( and emerges as soon as S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino for-)]TJ
-14.106 -1.14 TD
-.0182 Tw
[(mulates the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction as the principle per)-7.8(taining to )]TJ
T*
-.0007 Tw
[(the opposition betw)5.9(een )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.281 0 TD
0 Tw
(being )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.2223 0 TD
(and )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.6873 0 TD
(not-being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
7.644 0 0 7.8 261.2848 394.715 Tm
(4)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 265.1067 391.715 Tm
(.)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.25 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.2493 0 TD
-.0007 Tw
[(As a consequence, this r)9.8(eso-)]TJ
-17.4989 -1.14 TD
.0405 Tw
[(lution is r)9.8(equir)9.8(ed in or)13.9(der for the whole S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erinian theor)9.8(etical castle not )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(to cr)-7.8(umble to the gr)5.9(ound. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0493 Tw
[(M)29.8(y)0( focus will be on the formulation and r)9.8(esolution of the pr)5.9(oblem pr)9.8(e-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0227 Tw
[(sent in the famous \(at least in some I)23.9(talian philosophical cir)5.9(cles\) chapter 4 )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(of )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.0893 0 TD
.0633 Tw
[(La S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura O)5.9(riginaria )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.366 0 TD
[(\(and her)9.8(e par)-7.8(tially translated into E)5.9(nglish for )]TJ
-10.4553 -1.14 TD
.0903 Tw
(the first time\).)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
5.7246 0 TD
0 Tw
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.3403 0 TD
.0903 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino r)9.8(eturned to this topic mor)9.8(e r)9.8(ecently)84.9(, in a book )]TJ
-6.0648 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(called )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
2.4658 0 TD
.0127 Tw
[(I)11.9(ntorno al senso del nulla, )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.7978 0 TD
[(wher)9.8(e he pr)9.8(esents a ne)-5.9(w formulation and )]TJ
-12.2635 -1.14 TD
.0459 Tw
[(r)9.8(esolution of it. I shall not deal with this latter r)9.8(eformulation mainly for )]TJ
T*
.0187 Tw
[(two r)9.8(easons: first, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino nev)5.8(er thought that the latter formulation and )]TJ
T*
-.0168 Tw
[(r)9.8(esolution could supersede the 1958)79.8(s v)5.8(ersion \(quite the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( the ne)-5.8(w )]TJ
T*
-.048 Tw
[(v)5.9(ersion pr)9.8(esupposes the original one\); second, it is the original v)5.8(ersion that )]TJ
T*
.0575 Tw
[(plays a huge r)5.9(ole within S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( philosophy)84.9(, and upon which a major )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(discussion has dev)5.8(eloped o)15.9(v)5.8(er the y)5.9(ears)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 241.6922 216.8751 Tm
(5)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 245.514 213.8751 Tm
(. )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(52)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 168.3454 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0121 Tw
[(2 )-708.3(I shall sometimes speak of the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.1156 0 TD
0 Tw
[(parado)5.9(x)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9712 0 TD
-.0121 Tw
[( of nothingness, using the term )59.7(parado)5.9(x)39.7()0( as an )]TJ
-14.6405 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(inter)5.8(changeable term for )59.7(aporia)69.7(. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0481 Tw
[(3 )-648.1(S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino 1958, chapter 4, 1 p)15.8(.12 \(of the pr)9.7(esent v)5.8(olume\). M)23.9(ost of the quotations )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.071 Tw
[(fr)5.8(om S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( text come fr)5.8(om chapter 4 of )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.7181 0 TD
[(La S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura O)5.9(rginaria)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.79 0 TD
[(, and ar)9.8(e taken )]TJ
-26.5081 -1.14 TD
.0096 Tw
[(fr)5.8(om the E)5.8(nglish translation pr)9.8(esent in this v)5.8(olume. )44.8(The number page thus r)9.8(efers to )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(the pr)9.7(esent v)5.8(olume. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
[(4 )-696.2(I)11.9(n)0( this paper)59.7(, I shall consider the terms )59.7(nothing)17.8( and )59.7(not-being)17.8( as synonyms. )]TJ
T*
.0446 Tw
[(5 )-651.6(S)11.9(ee, for instance, S)11.9(asso \(1987\), )14.8(V)9.8(isentin \(2011\), D)11.9(on \(2008\) for some objections; )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0001 Tw
[(When one looks at the differ)9.8(ent occurr)9.8(ences of the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( and )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0006 Tw
[(similar terms in natural languages, one immediately notices that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(differ)9.8(ent )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.5692 0 TD
(grammatical)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.659 0 TD
.027 Tw
[( usages of them. M)23.9(ost of the time, )59.8(nothing)17.8( is used )]TJ
-8.2282 -1.14 TD
.1053 Tw
[(as a quantifier; mor)9.8(e rar)9.8(ely)84.9(, as a noun-phrase. O)5.9(ne can ev)5.8(en imagine a )]TJ
T*
.0553 Tw
[(pr)9.8(edicate, as in the famous H)17.8(eideggerian statement )-23.9(The N)29.8(othing noth-)]TJ
T*
.0796 Tw
[(ings)39.8( \(wher)9.8(e the first occurr)9.8(ence is a noun-phrase, while the second is a )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(pr)9.8(edicate\))]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 101.5853 527.3981 Tm
(6)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 105.4069 524.3981 Tm
.0251 Tw
[(. )44.8(These differ)9.8(ent usages clashed with S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formulation of )]TJ
-4.1432 -1.14 TD
-.0076 Tw
[(the aporia, wher)9.8(e no mention of such distinctions can be found. S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino )]TJ
T*
.0572 Tw
(speaks in general terms of the concept of nothing \(or of the meaning of )Tj
T*
-.0014 Tw
[(nothingness\), but he nev)5.8(er explicitly makes any of these distinctions. )44.9(The )]TJ
T*
.0004 Tw
[(impr)9.8(ession that one may get is that he is tr)-17.8(ying to let the logical str)-7.8(uctur)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
-.0111 Tw
[(of the pr)5.9(oblem emerge, bey)5.9(ond any super)-7.8(ficial grammatical differ)9.8(ence. I)11.9(n)0( )]TJ
T*
.0448 Tw
[(this way)84.9(, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( analysis would immediately r)9.8(each the essential str)-7.8(uc-)]TJ
T*
-.0505 Tw
[(tur)9.8(e of the pr)5.9(oblem, leaving behind all the non-essential and super)-7.8(ficial as-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(pects. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0436 Tw
[(H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( those distinctions do not r)9.8(egar)13.9(d mer)9.8(ely grammar; rather they )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0052 Tw
[(mirr)5.9(or impor)-7.8(tant logical differ)9.8(ences. )44.9(The whole of 2 of the pr)9.8(esent con-)]TJ
T*
-.0183 Tw
[(tribution is dedicated to explaining in detail why w)5.9(e)0( cannot av)5.8(oid consid-)]TJ
T*
-.0142 Tw
[(ering these distinctions. I)11.9(n)0( par)-7.8(ticular)59.8(, attention will be dev)5.8(oted to the dif-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(fer)9.8(ent )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
2.4694 0 TD
-.0169 Tw
(semantic contributions)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
8.2561 0 TD
[( that quantifiers, pr)9.8(edicates and noun-phrases )]TJ
-10.7255 -1.14 TD
.0608 Tw
[(bring to the meanings of sentences. )14.8(What this analysis sho)11.9(ws is that the )]TJ
T*
-.0057 Tw
[(differ)9.8(ent usages of )59.8(nothing)17.8( \(and r)9.8(elated terms\) as a quantifier)59.8(, as a pr)9.8(edi-)]TJ
T*
.0306 Tw
[(cate \(better: as the concept expr)9.8(essed b)5.9(y)0( a pr)9.8(edicate\) or as a noun-phrase )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
T*
-.0596 Tw
[(ar)9.8(e not equiv)5.9(alent to each other)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.2356 0 TD
[(. )44.8(This will clearly emerge when w)5.9(e)0( shall sho)11.9(w )]TJ
-11.2356 -1.14 TD
-.0275 Tw
[(that the parado)5.9(x of nothingness r)9.8(equir)9.8(es the interpr)9.8(etation of nothingness )]TJ
T*
-.0177 Tw
[(as a noun-phrase, and does not arise with the quantificational r)9.8(eading nor )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(with the pr)9.8(edicate r)9.8(eading. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0625 Tw
[(O)5.8(nce these thr)9.8(ee distinctions hav)5.8(e been intr)5.9(oduced, one naturally won-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0589 Tw
[(ders ho)11.9(w S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( talk of the notion of nothingness should be interpr)9.8(eted )]TJ
T*
-.0192 Tw
[(in light of them. )44.9(This task will be carried out in 3. F)33.9(irst, I intr)5.9(oduce S)11.9(ev-)]TJ
T*
.1521 Tw
[(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution \(3.1\) and then I pr)5.9(oceed to analyz)5.9(e and criticiz)5.9(e it )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(\(3.2\). M)23.9(o)0(r)9.8(e)0( specifically)84.9(, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution consists of two theses: )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(53)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 70.8555 135.5927 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0534 Tw
[(S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino r)9.7(eplies to some of these objections in S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino \(2009\). S)11.9(ee S)11.9(imionato \(2017\) )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0441 Tw
[(for an E)5.9(nglish discussion of S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( solution in r)9.8(elation to the contemporar)-17.8(y de-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(bate on this topic. )Tj
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0151 Tw
[(6 )-711.3(The H)17.8(eideggerian sentence has been at the center of r)9.8(ene)-5.9(w)5.8(ed inter)9.8(est: see Casati and )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(F)23.9(ujikawa \(2015, 2019\), O)11.9(liv)5.8(er and S)23.9(miley \(2012\), )14.9(V)99.7(oltolini \(2015\). )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(A\))-262.2(The meaning nothingness is self-contradictor)-17.8(y; )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0334 Tw
[(B\))-280.2(The determinate content of the meaning nothingness is consistent )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(\(it does not imply b)5.9(y)0( itself any contradiction\))]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 299.7625 582.1181 Tm
(7)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 303.5844 579.1181 Tm
(. )Tj
-19.0663 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
.0532 Tw
[(After dismissing the quantificational interpr)9.8(etation as not apt to cap-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0371 Tw
[(tur)9.8(e S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution, w)5.9(e)0( will sho)12(w that in neither of the other two in-)]TJ
T*
-.0299 Tw
[(terpr)9.8(etations of the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( can both theses be simultaneously tr)-7.8(ue. )]TJ
T*
.0224 Tw
[(When )59.8(nothing)17.8( is consider)9.8(ed to be a noun-phrase, then thesis A\) is tr)-7.8(ue, )]TJ
T*
-.0075 Tw
[(but thesis B\) turns out to be false; conv)5.8(ersely)84.9(, when w)5.9(e)0( consider the pr)9.8(ed-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(icate )59.8(to nothing)17.8(, thesis B\) is tr)-7.8(ue, but thesis A\) is false. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0844 Tw
[(This sho)11.9(ws that S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formulation and solution of the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
23.5247 0 TD
0 Tw
(aporia)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.361 0 TD
.0844 Tw
[( of )]TJ
-27.0909 -1.14 TD
.0035 Tw
(nothingness is untenable)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 177.2286 458.9981 Tm
0 Tw
(8)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 181.0505 455.9981 Tm
.0035 Tw
[(. )44.9(The same formulation of the pr)5.9(oblem he giv)5.8(es )]TJ
-9.852 -1.14 TD
-.0549 Tw
[(is based on an ambiguity betw)5.8(een )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase and )59.8(nothing)17.8( )]TJ
T*
-.0548 Tw
[(as expr)9.8(essing a concept. I)12(n)0( 3.2.2.1 I shall expose some passages wher)9.8(e this )]TJ
T*
-.0207 Tw
[(ambiguity clearly emerges. F)33.9(inally)84.9(, 4 concludes with some general r)9.8(eflec-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(tions on the r)9.8(esult of our criticism. )]TJ
/F9 1 Tf
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 65.1748 358.0782 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(2.)-879.6(Pr)11.2(eliminary R)14.7(emark)8.3(s: Names, Concepts, and Quan)9.3(tifier)12.2(s )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 344.0382 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 65.1748 328.1983 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(2.1)-387.4(Nothing as a quan)9.3(tifier )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 314.1583 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.019 Tw
[(P)5.9(hilosophical pr)5.9(oblems hav)5.8(e a str)5.9(ong r)9.8(elation to language, one that is cer-)]TJ
T*
.0005 Tw
[(tainly str)5.9(onger than those of other scientific disciplines. And the pr)5.9(oblem )]TJ
T*
-.0578 Tw
[(of nothingness is cer)-7.8(tainly a case in point: it has long been vie)-5.9(w)5.9(ed as a )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
26.3293 0 TD
0 Tw
(pseu-)Tj
-26.3293 -1.14 TD
(do)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.88 0 TD
.0768 Tw
[(-pr)5.9(oblem, i.e. a false pr)5.9(oblem arising fr)5.9(om a misunderstanding of the )]TJ
-.88 -1.14 TD
-.0287 Tw
[(logical str)-7.8(uctur)9.8(e of language. Carnap \(1932\) famously argued that the on-)]TJ
T*
.1202 Tw
[(ly meaning)-5.9(ful r)9.8(eading of )59.8(nothing)17.8( in a sentence is the quantificational )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(one, as in the follo)12(wing examples: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
[(1\))-385.2(Ther)9.8(e is nothing \(edible\) in the fridge )]TJ
T*
[(2\))-385.2(N)29.8(othing r)9.8(eally matters to me )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(54)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.1937 122.1297 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0447 Tw
[(7)-946.2( )44.8(This is what S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino usually calls the semantic moment )59.7(nothing)17.8( which is meaning-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(ful as nothing, or the )59.7(null-moment)17.8(. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0057 Tw
[(8 )-690.5(H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.7(,)0( this does not mean that the aporia is mer)9.8(ely a pseudo-pr)5.9(oblem, but rather )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(that the specific way in which S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino deals with it is mistaken. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0062 Tw
[(O)5.8(ne naturally r)9.8(eads 1\) as claiming that no food is in the fridge, and 2\) )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0396 Tw
[(as claiming that ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.5474 0 TD
(no thing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.1166 0 TD
[( that matters to me)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 294.0879 595.7981 Tm
0 Tw
(9)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 297.9097 592.7981 Tm
.0396 Tw
[(. )44.9(The two sentences )]TJ
-20.5125 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(may be \(par)-7.8(tially\) formaliz)5.9(ed as )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
(1\))Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 551.7581 Tm
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 99.0353 551.7581 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x is some food )Tj
/F11 1 Tf
5.25 0 TD
(&)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7778 0 TD
( x is in the fridge)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
6.176 0 TD
(\).)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.57 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-15.9101 -1.14 TD
(2\))Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 538.0781 Tm
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 99.0353 538.0781 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x matters to me)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.625 0 TD
(\) )Tj
-8.7612 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
-.054 Tw
[(The term )59.8(nothing)17.8( has been translated b)5.9(y)0( means of an existential quan-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.1978 TD
0 Tw
(tifier \()Tj
/F10 1 Tf
2.409 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.5869 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\) and a negation \()Tj
/F10 1 Tf
6.828 0 TD
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.7124 0 TD
(\). )Tj
-9.7511 -1.131 TD
.0558 Tw
[(Q)5.8(uantifiers ar)9.8(e expr)9.8(essions of generality b)5.9(y)0( means of which w)5.9(e)0( make )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0076 Tw
[(general statements. S)12(entences 1\) and 2\) ar)9.8(e not sentences about a specific )]TJ
T*
.0461 Tw
(subject-matter: sentence 1\) is not about this or that food, but rather is a )Tj
T*
.0038 Tw
(general sentence that denies that this food, that food, that other food etc. )Tj
T*
.0055 Tw
[(ar)9.8(e in the fridge; sentence 2\) is not about a specific pr)5.9(oblem or topic, but )]TJ
T*
.0322 Tw
[(rather is a general sentence that denies that this pr)5.9(oblem or that topic or )]TJ
T*
-.0121 Tw
[(that other topic etc. matter to me \(notice the )49.8(etc.)12( which makes clear that )]TJ
T*
.0012 Tw
[(w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e dealing with general sentences\). F)35.9(or comparison, consider the sen-)]TJ
T*
-.0153 Tw
[(tence P)53.9(egasus does not exist)17.8( and its standar)13.9(d translation accor)13.9(ding to the )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(R)11.9(ussell-Q)5.9(uine theor)-17.8(y of negativ)5.8(e existential sentences: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
[(3\))-1036(P)53.9(egasus does not exist )]TJ
T*
(3\) )Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 92.6821 318.6122 Tm
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 106.6887 318.6122 Tm
[(x P)53.9(egasiz)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
3.6262 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\) )Tj
-7.4133 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0172 Tw
[(wher)9.8(e )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
2.7571 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.9(e\(x\))]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.0162 0 TD
-.0172 Tw
[( is an ar)-7.8(tificial pr)9.8(edicate denoting a bunch of pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties )]TJ
-6.7733 -1.14 TD
-.0572 Tw
[(that the tradition ascribes to a mythological animal called P)53.9(egasus)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 347.7263 280.5722 Tm
0 Tw
(10)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 355.3699 277.5722 Tm
-.072 Tw
(. While )Tj
-25.3986 -1.14 TD
.0177 Tw
[(the informal sentence 3\) seems intuitiv)5.8(ely to be a sentence about P)53.9(egasus )]TJ
T*
.0038 Tw
[(\(and this is exactly what generates the parado)5.9(x of negativ)5.8(e existential sen-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(tences)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 84.2834 239.5323 Tm
(11)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 91.927 236.5323 Tm
.0605 Tw
[(\), 3\) is not a sentence about a specific living being, i.e. P)53.9(egasus, )]TJ
-2.997 -1.14 TD
-.0063 Tw
(but is )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
2.3865 0 TD
(a general sentence)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
6.4615 0 TD
[( that denies that this object, that object, that other )]TJ
-8.8479 -1.14 TD
-.0391 Tw
[(objects etc. satisfy the pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties traditionally ascribed to P)53.9(egasus. I)12(n)0( other )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(55)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 166.461 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0437 Tw
[(9 )-652.5(O)5.8(r)0( to F)35.8(r)9.7(eddie M)23.9(e)0(r)5.9(cur)-17.8(y)84.8(,)0( since this is a famous line fr)5.9(om the song Bohemian Rhap-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(sody)29.7(. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0862 Tw
[(10 )-110(R)11.9(ussell \(1905\) consider)9.7(ed terms such as P)53.9(egasus as disguised definite descriptions. )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(The idea of intr)5.8(oducing ar)-7.8(tificial pr)9.8(edicates of this sor)-7.8(t is due to Q)5.8(uine \(1948\). )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0039 Tw
[(11 )-200.1(S)23.9(uch a parado)5.8(x is a v)5.8(ersion of the aporia of nothingness: if I want to deny that a cer-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.012 Tw
[(tain thing exists, it seems that I hav)5.8(e to r)9.8(efer to that thing and to pr)9.8(edicate the non-)]TJ
T*
-.0084 Tw
[(existence of it. B)11.9(ut I should not be able to r)9.8(efer to something that does not exist. S)11.9(ee )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(B)5.8(e)0(r)-7.8(to \(2009\) for an intr)5.8(oduction to such topics. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0318 Tw
[(wor)13.9(ds, 3\) denies that ther)9.8(e is something that falls under the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
27.0372 0 TD
-.0539 Tc
0 Tw
[(Pe)-53.9(-)]TJ
-27.0372 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
[(gasiz)5.9(e\(x\))]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
3.1721 0 TD
(. )Tj
-1.9669 -1.14 TD
-.0341 Tw
[(T)119.8(o)0( sum up)15.9(, the R)12(ussell-Q)5.9(uine r)9.8(esolution to the parado)5.9(x of negativ)5.8(e ex-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0582 Tw
[(istential sentences consists in a double mo)15.9(v)5.8(e: first, the translation of the )]TJ
T*
-.0476 Tw
[(pr)5.9(oblematic terms \(i.e. the noun-phrases that seem to r)9.8(efer to non-existent )]TJ
T*
-.0528 Tw
[(objects\) b)5.9(y)0( means of )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.9169 0 TD
[(quantifiers and pr)9.8(edicates)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.3206 0 TD
(; second, the denial that such )Tj
-17.2374 -1.14 TD
.1194 Tw
[(sentences ar)9.8(e about the pr)5.9(oblematic entities: when their hidden logical )]TJ
T*
.0136 Tw
[(str)-7.8(uctur)9.8(e has been r)9.8(e)0(v)5.8(ealed, it is evident that they do not make any r)9.8(efer-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(ence to non-existent objects. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0198 Tw
[(Let us go back to sentences 1\) and 2\) and their r)9.8(espectiv)5.8(e formal trans-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0181 Tw
[(lation 1\) and 2\). )44.9(The term )59.8(nothing)17.8( in 1\) and 2\) that may appear to be a )]TJ
T*
.0632 Tw
(singular term)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 126.1225 458.9981 Tm
0 Tw
(12)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 133.7663 455.9981 Tm
.0632 Tw
[( has been translated b)5.9(y)0( means of a quantifier)59.8(. )44.8(The differ-)]TJ
-5.8312 -1.14 TD
-.0172 Tw
[(ence that emerges her)9.8(e is the one betw)5.9(een a )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
16.834 0 TD
0 Tw
(quantifier)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.694 0 TD
-.0172 Tw
[( and a )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
2.5405 0 TD
(singular term, )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-23.0685 -1.14 TD
-.039 Tw
[(or mor)9.8(e generally betw)5.8(een )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.2583 0 TD
(a quantifier)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.349 0 TD
[( and )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
1.86 0 TD
(a noun-phrase)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
7.644 0 0 7.8 319.9393 431.6381 Tm
0 Tw
(13)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 327.5831 428.6381 Tm
-.039 Tw
[(. )14.9(While the for-)]TJ
-22.3123 -1.14 TD
.0153 Tw
[(mer is an expr)9.8(ession of generality)84.9(, the latter is an expr)9.8(ession that r)9.8(efers to )]TJ
T*
-.015 Tw
[(a determined object \(or to mor)9.8(e determined objects\). Q)5.9(uantifiers ar)9.8(e syn-)]TJ
T*
-.0066 Tw
[(categor)9.8(ematic expr)9.8(essions that ar)9.8(e usually linked with a name or a v)5.8(erb to )]TJ
T*
-.0503 Tw
[(form r)9.8(estricted quantifier phrases)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 213.6069 376.9182 Tm
0 Tw
(14)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 221.2508 373.9182 Tm
-.0503 Tw
[( such as )42(some tables)39.8(, )49.8(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)-17.8(y)0( person)69.8(, )59.8(all )]TJ
-13.2704 -1.14 TD
.0313 Tw
[(human beings)39.8(. I)12(n)0( contemporar)-17.8(y logic, they ar)9.8(e normally tr)9.8(eated in con-)]TJ
T*
.0629 Tw
[(nection with pr)9.8(edicates: for instance, the sentence )59.8(all human beings ar)9.8(e )]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.0015 Tw
[(mor)-7.8(tal)11.9( is translated as )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 169.2523 332.1842 Tm
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 176.0266 332.1842 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(Hx)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
1.181 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.8379 0 TD
(Mx)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.294 0 TD
-.0015 Tw
[(\) to be r)9.8(ead as )39.8(for all )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
8.3078 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0015 Tw
(, if )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.2939 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0014 Tw
( falls under )Tj
-23.9194 -1.131 TD
0 Tc
-.003 Tw
(the concept of human being, then )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
13.3572 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0029 Tw
[( falls under the concept of mor)-7.9(tal)11.9(. I)11.9(n)-.1( )]TJ
-13.7772 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
.0034 Tw
(such a sentence, the semantic contribution of the quantifier is not that of )Tj
T*
-.0095 Tw
[(r)9.8(eferring to some specific human being, but rather specifies for whom the )]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.0017 Tw
(implication in its range )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
9.4341 0 TD
0 Tw
(Hx)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
1.181 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.8379 0 TD
(Mx)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.294 0 TD
-.0017 Tw
[( is v)5.8(alid: for )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
5.0092 0 TD
0 Tw
(all)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.936 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0016 Tw
( human beings \(and not, )Tj
-18.6922 -1.131 TD
0 Tc
-.0418 Tw
[(say)84.9(, for only some of them\). O)5.8(n)0( the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( the semantic contribution of )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0043 Tw
[(a noun-phrase, and in par)-7.8(ticular of a singular term, is the object to which )]TJ
T*
-.0509 Tw
[(the term r)9.8(efers. I)12(n)0( Caesar cr)5.9(ossed the R)11.9(ubicon)69.8(, the semantic contribution )]TJ
T*
.0207 Tw
[(of the noun Caesar)19.8( is the R)11.9(oman general J)35.9(ulius Caesar)59.8(. I)23.9(t)0( is because the )]TJ
T*
-.0074 Tw
[(noun Caesar)19.8( r)9.8(efers to J)35.9(ulius Caesar that this sentence )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
21.0074 0 TD
(is about him)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.6033 0 TD
[(. S)11.9(imi-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(56)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 157.2096 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[(12 )-196.2(This is tr)-7.8(ue in par)-7.8(ticular for 2\), rather than 1\). )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0266 Tw
[(13 )-169.6(F)35.8(r)5.8(om a grammatical point of vie)-5.8(w)74.8(,)0( a noun-phrase is a noun \(together with all other )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0157 Tw
[(wor)13.9(ds that modify it\) that can play the r)5.9(ole of the subject, dir)9.7(ect or indir)9.8(ect object of )]TJ
T*
-.0286 Tw
[(a sentence, or it can follo)11.9(w a pr)9.8(eposition. S)11.9(ingular terms ar)9.8(e noun-phrases, but plural )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(terms and definite descriptions \(both singular and plurals\) ar)9.8(e also noun-phrases. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0556 Tw
[(14 )-251.8(F)35.8(or a general intr)5.8(oduction to quantifiers and the way in which they ar)9.7(e tr)9.8(eated in con-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(temporar)-17.8(y logic, see U)17.8(zquiano \(2020\). )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0663 Tw
[(larly with the term )59.8(nothing)17.8(. )14.9(When it is used as a quantifier)59.8(, it is just a )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0235 Tw
[(means of denying that something is the case. F)35.9(or instance, 1\) denies that )]TJ
T*
.0082 Tw
[(some food is in the fridge, and it is not claiming that some par)-7.8(ticular ob-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(ject the nothingness is in the fridge. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 522.2381 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(2.2)-387.4( The quan)9.3(tific)8.3(a)9.3(tional use of nothing)-40.5( is not pr)16.1(oblema)9.3(tic )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 508.1981 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.1391 Tw
[(I)5.9(f)0( all occurr)9.8(ences of )59.8(nothing)17.8( could be translated into quantificational )]TJ
T*
-.0383 Tw
[(terms, then ther)9.8(e would be no aporia of nothingness. And in fact, that was )]TJ
T*
.034 Tw
[(Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( vie)-5.9(w of the matter)59.8(. Carnap believ)5.8(ed that w)5.9(e)0( should translate all )]TJ
T*
-.0589 Tw
[(occurr)9.8(ences of )59.8(nothing)17.8( b)5.9(y)0( means of a quantifier)59.8(, and in this way the pr)5.9(ob-)]TJ
T*
.2078 Tw
[(lem simply disappears. I)11.9(n)0( Carnap \(1932\), he considers the sentences )]TJ
T*
.0779 Tw
[(N)29.8(othing is outside)29.8(, and claims that despite the grammatical form sug-)]TJ
T*
.06 Tw
[(gesting that w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e attributing the pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ty being outside)29.8( to the object )]TJ
T*
-.0016 Tw
[(nothingness, the r)9.8(eal logical form is )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 223.1159 398.7582 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 237.1225 398.7582 Tm
[(xO)5.8(ut\(x\))]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9841 0 TD
-.0016 Tw
[(: ther)9.8(e is no )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
5.0058 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0015 Tw
( such that )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.0281 0 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
( )Tj
-28.2016 -1.14 TD
-.0418 Tw
[(is outside. )44.9(The sentence mer)9.8(ely claims that no object instantiates the pr)9.8(ed-)]TJ
T*
.0751 Tw
[(icate being outside)29.8(. As in the examples abo)15.9(v)5.8(e, the statement makes no )]TJ
T*
-.0508 Tw
[(r)9.8(efer)9.8(ence to the object nothingness. H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( when confr)5.9(onted with some )]TJ
T*
.0001 Tc
.0034 Tw
[(statements made b)6(y).1( H)17.9(eidegger \(such as )-17.7(W)77.9(e seek the nothing)17.9(, )-17.7(W)77.9(e kno)12.1(w )]TJ
T*
0 Tc
-.0011 Tw
[(the nothing)17.8(, )-23.9(The N)29.8(othing nothings)39.8(\), Carnap claims that no translation )]TJ
T*
-.0556 Tw
[(b)5.9(y)0( means of a quantifier is possible, and as such these statements ar)9.8(e mean-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(ingless)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 86.2826 305.9983 Tm
(15)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 93.9263 302.9983 Tm
(. )Tj
-1.9618 -1.14 TD
-.0387 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( any ev)5.8(ent, the r)9.8(eason why the quantificational use of )59.8(nothing)17.8( is not )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.047 Tw
[(pr)5.9(oblematic is that such use does not imply any r)9.8(efer)9.8(ence to a hypothetical )]TJ
T*
.0598 Tw
[(\(and pr)5.9(oblematic\) state of nothingness. And this is made evident b)5.9(y)0( the )]TJ
T*
-.0583 Tw
(fact that the state of nothingness \(or the object nothingness\) is not the sub-)Tj
T*
0 Tw
(ject-matter of sentences 1\), 2\) or )Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 209.7859 234.5983 Tm
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 223.7925 234.5983 Tm
[(xO)5.9(ut)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
1.9241 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\). )Tj
-15.669 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(57)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 177.9487 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0167 Tw
[(15 )-212.9(A)11.9(ctually)84.8(, Carnap)49.7()79.7(s)0( argument is a little mor)9.8(e complicated. F)35.8(or instance, he mentioned )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0048 Tw
[(the H)17.8(eideggerian claim that )109.7(Anxiety r)9.7(e)0(v)5.8(eals the nothingness)39.7( as a clue for supposing )]TJ
T*
.0224 Tw
[(that the wor)13.9(d )59.7(nothing)17.8( as used b)5.8(y)0( H)17.8(eidegger actually r)9.8(efers to something, )59.7(a)0( cer)-7.8(tain )]TJ
T*
-.0413 Tw
[(emotional constitution, possibly of a r)9.8(eligious sor)-7.8(t, or something or other that under-)]TJ
T*
-.0004 Tw
[(lies such emotions. I)5.9(f)0( such w)5.8(e)0(r)9.8(e)0( the case, then the mention logical err)5.9(ors [] would )]TJ
T*
.0068 Tw
[(not be committed)11.9( \(Carnap 1932, p)15.8(.)0( 71\). Carnap her)9.8(e seems to ackno)11.9(wledge the le-)]TJ
T*
.0272 Tw
[(gitimacy of the term )59.7(nothing)17.8( \(or )59.7(nothingness)39.7(\) as a noun-phrase. B)11.9(ut he dismisses )]TJ
T*
-.0027 Tw
[(such interpr)9.7(etation in the case of H)17.8(eidegger)19.7()79.7(s)0( )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.5332 0 TD
[(W)87.7(as is M)23.9(etaphysik?)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
7.032 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0026 Tw
( because in the same )Tj
-24.5652 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(argument H)17.8(eidegger tr)9.8(eats )59.7(nothing)17.8( also as a quantifier)59.7(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 65.1748 604.3181 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0101 Tc
0 Tw
[(2)-10.1(.)-10.1(3)-397.5(Ar)13.2(e the nonquan)9.3(tific)8.3(a)9.3(tional occurr)13.2(ences of nothing)-40.5()0( legitima)9.3(t)10.8(e? )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 590.2781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0337 Tw
[(W)77.8(e)0( can concede to Carnap that many)84.9(, if not most, of the occurr)9.8(ences of )]TJ
T*
.0117 Tw
[()59.8(nothing)17.8( in our sentences admit such a translation b)5.9(y)0( means of a quanti-)]TJ
T*
.0191 Tw
[(fier)59.8(. B)11.9(ut ar)9.8(e w)5.9(e)0( sur)9.8(e that w)5.9(e)0( can always per)-7.8(form such translation? )14.8(W)77.8(e)0( ar)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
.137 Tw
[(her)9.8(e translating a sentence with an occurr)9.8(ence of )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-)]TJ
T*
.0374 Tw
[(phrase into a sentence wher)9.8(e that noun-phrase has been substituted b)5.9(y)0( a )]TJ
T*
-.0387 Tw
[(quantifier)59.8(. F)35.9(or the translation to be effectiv)5.8(e, the quantified sentence must )]TJ
T*
.0486 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e the same )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
5.765 0 TD
0 Tw
(meaning)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.181 0 TD
.0486 Tw
[( of the original sentence. And whatev)5.9(er y)5.8(our pr)9.8(e-)]TJ
-8.946 -1.14 TD
.1011 Tw
[(ferr)9.8(ed theor)-17.8(y of meaning is, a necessar)-17.8(y condition for two sentences to )]TJ
T*
-.0404 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e the same meaning is that they ar)9.8(e materially equiv)5.8(alent, i.e. they hav)5.8(e )]TJ
T*
.0906 Tw
[(the same tr)-7.8(uth-v)5.8(alue. I)12(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, if w)5.9(e)0( translate a natural language )]TJ
T*
.0917 Tw
[(sentence wher)9.8(e the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( appears as a noun-phrase into a sen-)]TJ
T*
-.0573 Tw
[(tence wher)9.8(e )59.8(nothing)17.8( has been r)9.8(ender)9.8(ed b)5.9(y)0( a quantifier \()]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 316.4821 426.1182 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.2993 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 335.0164 426.1182 Tm
-.0573 Tw
(\), and the two )Tj
-22.9443 -1.14 TD
.0018 Tw
[(sentences do not hav)5.9(e the same tr)-7.8(uth-v)5.8(alue, then the translation is clearly )]TJ
T*
-.0028 Tw
[(faulty)84.9(. )44.9(T)119.8(o)0( illustrate this with an example, let us consider the follo)11.9(wing sit-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(uation: )Tj
9.8 0 0 10 79.3642 372.8382 Tm
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 360.7182 Tm
-.0053 Tw
[(F)33.8(ilippo is confused about the pr)5.8(oblem of nothingness: he does not )]TJ
T*
.1164 Tw
[(kno)11.9(w whether it is a r)9.7(eal or a )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
12.3323 0 TD
0 Tw
(pseudo-)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.752 0 TD
.1164 Tw
[(pr)5.8(oblem. S)11.9(o)0( he decides to )]TJ
-15.0843 -1.14 TD
-.0586 Tw
[(study the issue in mor)9.7(e depth; he r)9.7(eads a lot, he spends hours taking )]TJ
T*
.0183 Tw
[(notes, and writing on it, and he gets v)5.8(e)0(r)-17.8(y)0( inv)5.8(olv)5.8(ed in the pr)5.8(oblem )]TJ
T*
-.0057 Tw
[(befor)9.7(e making up his mind on it. A)5.8(t)0( a cer)-7.8(tain point, astonished b)5.8(y)0( )]TJ
T*
-.0531 Tw
[(the fact that he is so inv)5.8(olv)5.8(ed in the pr)5.8(oblem, he ex)11.9(claims: N)29.7(othing )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(r)9.7(eally matters to me! )]TJ
9.8 0 0 10 79.3642 273.6583 Tm
( )Tj
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 260.8183 Tm
.0116 Tw
[(H)17.8(o)11.9(w should w)5.9(e)0( interpr)9.8(et the last sentence? I)17.8(s)0( F)33.9(ilippo saying that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
25.2139 0 TD
0 Tw
[(ther)9.8(e )]TJ
-26.4191 -1.14 TD
-.0448 Tw
(is no)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.6522 0 TD
[( pr)5.9(oblem or no topic that inter)9.8(ests him? )44.9(This does not seem right. )44.9(The )]TJ
-1.6522 -1.14 TD
.034 Tw
[(context suggests that what F)33.9(ilippo is claiming is that nothingness \(in the )]TJ
T*
-.057 Tw
[(sense of the absolute nothing, i.e. the absence of ev)5.9(er)-17.8(ything, and the aporia )]TJ
T*
.1766 Tw
(that this absence raises\) matters to him. As such, the quantificational )Tj
T*
-.0245 Tw
[(translation is simply wr)5.9(ong because it giv)5.8(es rise to a sentence with )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
25.2606 0 TD
(a differ-)Tj
-25.2606 -1.14 TD
.0272 Tw
(ent meaning.)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.8392 0 TD
[( As a matter of fact, the quantificational r)9.8(eading \(ther)9.8(e is no )]TJ
-4.8392 -1.14 TD
-.0142 Tw
[(pr)5.9(oblem in which F)33.9(ilippo is inter)9.8(ested\) is false, because ther)9.8(e is a pr)5.9(oblem )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(that inter)9.8(ests F)33.9(ilippo, namely the pr)5.9(oblem of nothingness. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0535 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( the literatur)9.8(e ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e differ)9.8(ent examples of sentences that cannot be )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0331 Tw
[(dir)9.8(ectly translated into quantificational terms)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 271.7165 127.0183 Tm
0 Tw
(16)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 279.3602 124.0183 Tm
.0331 Tw
[(; my fav)5.8(orite being an ex-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(58)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 90.0418 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[(16 )-196.2(S)11.9(ee P)29.7(riest \(2014\) and O)11.9(liv)5.8(er and S)23.9(miley \(2012\) for some fur)-7.8(ther examples. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0121 Tw
[(ample used b)5.9(y)0( P)29.8(riest \(2014\). Consider the sentence G)5.9(od cr)9.8(eated the uni-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0736 Tw
[(v)5.9(erse out of nothing)17.8(, and translate it b)5.9(y)0( means of a quantifier: )59.8(ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
T*
-.0454 Tw
[(nothing fr)5.9(om which G)5.9(od cr)9.8(eated the univ)5.8(erse)29.8(. B)11.9(ut this would be tr)-7.8(ue also )]TJ
T*
-.0288 Tw
[(in the case G)5.9(od nev)5.8(er cr)9.8(eated the univ)5.8(erse. )44.9(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, the quantificational )]TJ
T*
-.0282 Tw
[(translation giv)5.8(es us a differ)9.8(ent sentence that can hav)5.9(e a differ)9.8(ent tr)-7.8(uth-v)5.9(al-)]TJ
T*
.0405 Tw
[(ue with r)9.8(egar)13.9(d to the original one. )44.9(This should sho)11.9(w that in the original )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(sentence )59.8(nothing)17.8( is not quantifier)59.8(, but a tr)-7.8(ue noun-phrase)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 323.7462 527.3981 Tm
(17)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 331.3899 524.3981 Tm
(. )Tj
-22.1543 -1.14 TD
-.0225 Tw
[(O)5.8(f)0( course, Carnap \(1932\) would hav)5.8(e dismissed the latter example be-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0604 Tw
[(cause it inv)5.9(olv)5.9(es metaphysical concepts such as G)5.9(od, the cr)9.8(eation of the )]TJ
T*
-.0108 Tw
[(world, etc. for which no v)5.8(erificationist criterion of application can be giv-)]TJ
T*
.0713 Tw
[(en. H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.9(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( this depends on the v)5.8(erificationist theor)-17.8(y of meaning that )]TJ
T*
.0252 Tw
(Carnap defended at that time, and which has since been clearly disquali-)Tj
T*
0 Tw
[(fied. As such, w)5.9(e)0( need not worr)-17.8(y about it. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
/F6 1 Tf
10.9996 0 0 13.2 56.6522 400.0182 Tm
[(2.3.1)-551.5(Not)30.8(equiv)14.7(alence of the tw)9.3(o in)9.3(t)10.8(erpr)13.2(e)5.4(t)12.2(a)9.3(tions of the t)10.8(erm nothing)-40.5( )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 386.2782 Tm
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.1115 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( the last paragraph, w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e sho)11.9(wn that the quantificational and the )]TJ
T*
.0381 Tw
[(noun-phrase r)9.8(eading of nothing ar)9.8(e not equiv)5.8(alent. )44.9(The sentence N)29.8(oth-)]TJ
T*
.0059 Tw
[(ing r)9.8(eally matters to me)29.8( expr)9.8(esses two differ)9.8(ent meanings, i.e. two differ-)]TJ
T*
.0223 Tw
[(ent pr)5.9(opositions, when )59.8(nothing)17.8( is interpr)9.8(eted as a quantifier or as a sin-)]TJ
T*
.0439 Tw
[(gular term. Concerning the situation in which F)33.9(ilippo finds himself)15.9(, the )]TJ
T*
.0305 Tw
[(quantifier r)9.8(eading turns out to be false, while the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading is )]TJ
T*
.0843 Tw
[(actually tr)-7.8(ue. S)12(ince the two r)9.8(eadings expr)9.8(ess pr)5.9(opositions with differ)9.8(ent )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(tr)-7.8(uth-v)5.9(alues, they cannot be equiv)5.8(alent. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0771 Tw
[(I)23.9(t)0( is in vir)-7.8(tue of this non-equiv)5.8(alence that Carnap could pr)5.9(opose his )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.1809 Tw
[(thesis accor)13.9(ding to which w)5.9(e)0( should av)5.8(oid interpr)9.8(eting )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a )]TJ
T*
.0745 Tw
[(noun-phrase, and stick with the quantificational r)9.8(eading. S)11.9(ince they ar)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
.0999 Tw
[(not equiv)5.8(alent, once w)5.9(e)0( accept the quantificational r)9.8(eading, w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e not )]TJ
T*
.0598 Tw
[(compelled to accept the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading either)59.8(. I)11.9(n)0( no way does the )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(quantificational r)9.8(eading imply the other r)9.8(eading. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0612 Tw
[(I)23.9(t)0( is impor)-7.8(tant to str)9.8(ess this differ)9.8(ence because it is sometimes confused. )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0416 Tw
[(F)35.9(or instance, it is confused when one claims that the fundamental onto-)]TJ
T*
-.0539 Tw
[(logical question: )-17.8(Why is ther)9.8(e something rather than nothing? is mislead-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(59)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 111.159 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.1409 Tw
[(17 H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.7(,)0( this par)-7.8(ticular example has been challenged b)5.8(y)0( Sgarav)5.8(atti and S)23.9(polaor)9.8(e )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0112 Tw
[(\(2018\), who pr)5.8(o)15.8(vide an interpr)9.8(etation of the sentence without assuming )59.7(nothing)17.8( as )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(a singular term. As such, the example cannot be consider)9.8(ed conclusiv)5.8(e. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.03 Tw
[(ing, because the supposition that ther)9.8(e could be nothing would be contra-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.1297 Tw
[(dictor)-17.8(y)84.9(.)0( A)12(ccor)13.9(ding to such a train of thought, such supposition would )]TJ
T*
-.0401 Tw
[(amount to considering a situation wher)9.8(e ther)9.8(e would be at least one thing: )]TJ
T*
.0444 Tw
[(the state of nothingness. I)11.9(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, to suppose that ther)9.8(e would be )]TJ
T*
-.0588 Tw
[(no thing \(quantificational r)9.8(eading\) would mean that w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e supposing that )]TJ
T*
.0792 Tw
[(ther)9.8(e is the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything \(noun-phrase r)9.8(eading\). B)11.9(ut if ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
T*
.0256 Tw
[(one thing, then it is false that ther)9.8(e is no thing. Clearly)84.9(, the mistake her)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
.0469 Tw
[(is to confuse the quantificational with the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading. )14.9(When I )]TJ
T*
.0507 Tw
[(consider a situation wher)9.8(e ther)9.8(e is nothing, I am considering a situation )]TJ
T*
-.029 Tw
[(wher)9.8(e no thing is pr)9.8(esent \(quantificational r)9.8(eading\), and this does not im-)]TJ
T*
-.0159 Tw
[(ply that a par)-7.8(ticular thing the nothingness is pr)9.8(esent)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 317.231 472.6781 Tm
0 Tw
(18)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 324.8747 469.6781 Tm
-.0159 Tw
[(. )44.9(The same con-)]TJ
-22.0819 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(fusion can be found in the follo)11.9(wing r)9.8(eply to Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( position: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 429.3581 Tm
.0855 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( par)-7.8(ticular)59.6(, Carnap believ)5.8(ed that speaking of being)17.8( as a noun )]TJ
T*
-.024 Tw
[(and thus as a subject of pr)9.7(edication was the r)9.7(esult of a pathology of )]TJ
T*
.1297 Tw
[(language. A)11.9(ccor)13.9(ding to him, being)17.8( was a pseudo-concept born )]TJ
T*
.0409 Tw
[(fr)5.8(om the illegitimate hypostatization of the logical function of af-)]TJ
T*
-.0554 Tw
[(firming. [] I)11.9(n)0( a symbolic language [] the use of the v)5.8(erb being)17.8( )]TJ
T*
.0554 Tw
[(should be substituted b)5.8(y)0( the )49.7(existential quantifier)19.7( applied to the )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(v)5.8(ariable )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.2728 0 TD
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.7266 0 TD
.0566 Tw
[([]. N)29.7(o)11.9(w)74.7(,)0( ev)5.8(en if w)5.8(e)0( admit \(but w)5.8(e)0( do not tr)-7.8(uly con-)]TJ
-3.9994 -1.14 TD
.0175 Tw
[(cede\) that the r)9.7(eduction of being)17.8( to its mer)9.7(e symbolic form is le-)]TJ
T*
.0765 Tw
[(gitimate, one has to r)9.7(ecogniz)5.8(e that the existence )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
19.2471 0 TD
(extra nihil nega-)Tj
-19.2471 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(tivum)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.213 0 TD
.0802 Tw
[(, which is indicated b)5.8(y)0( the quantifier symbol, is something )]TJ
-2.213 -1.14 TD
-.005 Tw
[(meaning)-5.8(ful []. S)11.9(o, it is not har)13.9(d to r)9.7(ecogniz)5.8(e that such a symbol )]TJ
T*
-.0087 Tw
[(expr)9.7(esses nothing mor)9.7(e than a judgment of pr)9.7(esence: rather than a )]TJ
T*
-.0516 Tw
[(quantifier)59.6(, it is a )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.3088 0 TD
0 Tw
[(pr)9.7(esentifier )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.2206 0 TD
-.0516 Tw
[([pr)9.7(esentificator)9.7(e] []. )44.8(This r)9.7(e)0(v)5.8(eals that )]TJ
-10.5294 -1.14 TD
.0825 Tw
[(the neo-positivist attempt of getting rid of ontology put for)-17.8(war)13.9(d )]TJ
T*
.0846 Tw
[(again [] the same ontological differ)9.7(ence, i.e. the differ)9.7(ence be-)]TJ
T*
.0937 Tw
[(tw)5.8(een the )59.6(p)0(r)9.7(esence)29.7( [the quantifier] and the objects pr)9.7(esent [the )]TJ
T*
.0248 Tw
[(v)5.8(alues of the v)5.8(ariables]. P)41.9(agani 2014, pp)15.8(. 55-56 \(the translation is )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(mine\). )Tj
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 202.9183 Tm
( )Tj
T*
.0701 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( this text, the wor)13.9(d )59.8(p)0(r)9.8(esence)29.8( is a synonym of being)17.8(: as such, the )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0198 Tw
[(passage is arguing that the Carnapian attempt to get rid of the substantiv)5.8(e )]TJ
T*
-.035 Tw
[(r)9.8(eading of being)17.8( in fav)5.9(or of the existential quantifier fails, because the ex-)]TJ
T*
-.0407 Tw
[(istential quantifier just expr)9.8(esses the same pr)9.8(esence, i.e. the same notion of )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(60)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 101.9336 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0021 Tw
[(18 )-198.3(This is exactly \(a par)-7.8(t of)-109.6(\) the objection that Carnap \(1932\) raises against H)17.8(eidegger)59.7(. )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(O)5.8(n)0( this point, Carnap is completely right. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
47 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.038 Tw
[(being. )44.9(The differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een the \(existential\) quantifier and the v)5.8(alues of )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0076 Tw
[(its bounded v)5.9(ariables is interpr)9.8(eted as the same ontological differ)9.8(ence, i.e. )]TJ
T*
.0425 Tw
[(as the differ)9.8(ence betw)5.8(een being)17.8( \(or pr)9.8(esence\) and the determinate enti-)]TJ
T*
-.0123 Tw
[(ties. )44.9(This r)9.8(eading clearly pr)9.8(esupposes an objectual r)9.8(eading of the quantifi-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(er)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 65.2439 554.7581 Tm
(19)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 72.8876 551.7581 Tm
-.0612 Tw
[(; ho)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( ev)5.8(en granting this, while the analogy betw)5.9(een the v)5.8(alues that )]TJ
-1.378 -1.14 TD
.0076 Tw
[(the bounded v)5.8(ariable of an objectual quantifier with the differ)9.8(ent entities )]TJ
T*
-.0306 Tw
[(wor)5.9(ks, the same cannot be said for the parallel betw)5.9(een the quantifier \()]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 373.3031 524.3981 Tm
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 379.6301 524.3981 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\) )Tj
-27.8815 -1.14 TD
.0017 Tw
[(and the substantiv)5.9(e being)17.8(, since, as w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e alr)9.8(eady seen, the quantifica-)]TJ
T*
-.0604 Tw
[(tional and the substantiv)5.8(e r)9.8(eading ar)9.8(e not equiv)5.8(alent. S)23.9(uch a critique of the )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( vie)-5.8(w just confuses the two r)9.8(eadings)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 257.1975 486.3581 Tm
(20)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 264.8412 483.3581 Tm
(. )Tj
-16.4954 -1.14 TD
.0829 Tw
[(H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( this does not mean that Carnap is right. H)5.9(aving ackno)12(wl-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.023 Tw
[(edged the irr)9.8(educibility of the two r)9.8(eadings, one can argue against Carnap )]TJ
T*
.006 Tw
[(that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e occurr)9.8(ences of )59.8(nothing)17.8( that must be translated b)5.9(y)0( a noun-)]TJ
T*
.0595 Tw
[(phrase in or)13.9(der to pr)9.8(eser)-17.8(v)5.8(e)0( the sentence)29.8()79.8(s)0( intended meaning. And this is )]TJ
T*
.0119 Tw
[(what w)5.9(e)0( did befor)9.8(e. Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( mistake was thus to believ)5.8(e that w)5.9(e)0( can liv)5.8(e )]TJ
T*
.1514 Tw
[(only with the quantificational r)9.8(eading: on the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( sometimes w)5.9(e)0( )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(need to worr)-17.8(y about nothing\(ness\). )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 344.3982 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(2.4)-387.4(Wher)13.2(e the aporia arises )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 330.3582 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0117 Tw
[(When the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( is consider)9.8(ed to be a genuine noun-phrase, then )]TJ
T*
.0066 Tw
[(the aporia of nothingness arises. A)5.9(t)0( the beginning of chapter 4 \(1\) of )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
27.2115 0 TD
0 Tw
(La )Tj
-27.2115 -1.14 TD
-.0499 Tw
[(S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura O)5.9(riginaria, )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.0863 0 TD
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino says that nothing is )39.8(what is absolutely other )]TJ
-8.0863 -1.14 TD
.0227 Tw
[(than being, and ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e w)5.9(e)0( might say insofar as it is that which lies)]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
28.2016 0 TD
0 Tw
( )Tj
-28.2016 -1.14 TD
[(bey)5.8(ond )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.8366 0 TD
.0335 Tw
(being, understood as the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
9.8379 0 TD
[(totality of being)17.8(.)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
6.2391 0 TD
[( As such, nothingness is )]TJ
-18.9137 -1.14 TD
.1222 Tw
[(her)9.8(e characteriz)5.9(ed as the absence \(or lack\) of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything. I)5.9(f)0( w)5.9(e)0( use the )]TJ
T*
-.0616 Tw
[(pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.9216 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 107.7401 234.5983 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 115.7934 234.5983 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0616 Tw
[( to expr)9.8(ess the notion of being \(since ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything is self-iden-)]TJ
-5.4464 -1.14 TD
-.0598 Tw
[(tical, the pr)9.8(edicate applies to any object\), the pr)9.8(edicate )59.8(nothing)17.8( will be ex-)]TJ
T*
.055 Tw
[(pr)9.8(essed b)5.9(y)0( )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 110.2295 207.2383 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 117.9091 207.2383 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 122.8484 207.2383 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 130.9018 207.2383 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 2.2914 11 135.8409 207.2383 Tm
(')Tj
10.78 0 0 11 138.3939 207.2383 Tm
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 141.2897 207.2383 Tm
.055 Tw
[(or shor)-7.8(ter )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
4.3617 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 197.5229 207.2383 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 205.5764 207.2383 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.055 Tw
[(. )14.9(W)9.8(ith the latter pr)9.8(edicate, w)5.9(e)0( can ex-)]TJ
-13.081 -1.14 TD
.1705 Tw
[(pr)9.8(ess nothingness as )59.8(the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything)17.8( in the follo)12(wing way: )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(61)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 143.6452 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0091 Tw
[(19 )-205.3(And not a substitutional r)9.8(eading. I)11.9(n)0( the objectual r)9.7(eading, the bounded v)5.8(ariables ar)9.8(e )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0481 Tw
[(taken to range o)15.8(v)5.8(er objects; in the substitutional r)9.8(eading, the bounded v)5.8(ariables range )]TJ
T*
-.0339 Tw
[(o)15.8(v)5.8(er substitutional classes of expr)9.8(essions. S)11.9(ee U)17.8(zquiano \(2020\) for an analysis of such )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(differ)9.7(ence. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0377 Tw
[(20 )-158.5(S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino giv)5.8(es a differ)9.7(ent critique of Carnap)49.7()79.7(s)0( vie)-5.8(w)74.8(.)0( I will deal with it later on, after )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(having intr)5.8(oduced the notion of concept. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
54 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 2.2914 11 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(y)83(.)]TJ
10.78 0 0 11 75.0026 606.4781 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 81.7769 606.4781 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 86.7161 606.4781 Tm
(~\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 98.8699 606.4781 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 103.8091 606.4781 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 111.8626 606.4781 Tm
(y)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 116.1667 606.4781 Tm
(\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
7.644 0 0 7.8 120.641 609.4781 Tm
(21)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 128.2848 606.4781 Tm
-.0577 Tw
[(. )44.9(This simply says that nothingness is the object \(or the state\) )]TJ
-5.3651 -1.14 TD
.0491 Tw
[(which is differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything, i.e. it is differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om each determi-)]TJ
T*
-.0441 Tw
[(nate being. O)5.9(nce w)5.8(e)0( admit such a term, it is easy to deriv)5.8(e a contradiction. )]TJ
T*
.0151 Tw
[(Let us consider the follo)11.9(wing sentence \(that y)5.8(ou can often find in S)12(e)0(v)5.9(eri-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(no)49.8()79.8(s)0( writings\): )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
[(4. N)29.8(othing is opposed to B)5.8(eing. )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
T*
.0191 Tw
[(H)17.8(e)0(r)9.8(e)0( both )59.8(nothing)17.8( and being)17.8( ar)9.8(e used as nouns: the natural r)9.8(eading of )]TJ
T*
-.0417 Tw
[(4 is that being and nothing find themselv)5.8(es in a r)9.8(elation of opposition. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(may formaliz)5.9(e 4 as follo)12(ws: )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
T*
(5. )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.0239 0 TD
(O\(n,b\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.587 0 TD
.0239 Tw
[(, wher)9.8(e )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.087 0 TD
0 Tw
(O\(x,y\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.406 0 TD
.0239 Tw
[( is the r)9.8(elation of opposition; )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
11.5526 0 TD
0 Tw
(n)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.501 0 TD
.0239 Tw
[( is the term )59.8(noth-)]TJ
-21.1575 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(ing)17.8(, while )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
4.2702 0 TD
(b)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.466 0 TD
[( is the term being)17.8(. )]TJ
-4.7362 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
1.2052 -1.1978 TD
-.019 Tw
[(A)5.8(t)0( this point it is natural to apply an instance of )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
18.5621 0 TD
0 Tw
()Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.5869 0 TD
-.019 Tw
[(-I)11.9(ntr)5.9(oduction to ob-)]TJ
-20.3542 -1.131 TD
0 Tw
(tain )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
(6. )Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 76.951 359.6522 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 83.2781 359.6522 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 2.2914 11 88.2172 359.6522 Tm
(O)Tj
10.78 0 0 11 95.2601 359.6522 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 99.7342 359.6522 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 104.6734 359.6522 Tm
(,)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 106.8841 359.6522 Tm
(b)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 112.3644 359.6522 Tm
(\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 116.8384 359.6522 Tm
( )Tj
-3.1866 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
.0622 Tw
[(This sentence says that ther)9.8(e is something which is in the r)9.8(elation of )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0687 Tw
[(opposition with being, which is equiv)5.8(alent to saying that ther)9.8(e is some-)]TJ
T*
-.0093 Tw
[(thing which is differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om each determinate being. As such, this object )]TJ
T*
.0658 Tw
[(satisfies the definition of nothingness: it is differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything. I)12(n)0( )]TJ
T*
.0101 Tw
[(par)-7.8(ticular)59.8(, it will be differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om itself )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
15.5931 0 TD
0 Tw
(n)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 254.4578 277.5722 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 262.5113 277.5722 Tm
(n)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.501 0 TD
.0101 Tw
[(. B)11.9(ut ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything is self-iden-)]TJ
-17.2799 -1.14 TD
-.0323 Tw
[(tical, so w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.3363 0 TD
0 Tw
(n)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 145.5974 263.8922 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 153.6508 263.8922 Tm
(n)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.501 0 TD
-.0323 Tw
[(. N)29.8(othingness is a self-contradictor)-17.8(y object \(or state\), )]TJ
-8.0231 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(and consequently 6 seems immediately self-defeating)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 304.5779 253.2122 Tm
(22)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 312.2216 250.2122 Tm
(. )Tj
-19.8008 -1.14 TD
.1051 Tw
[(Clearly the aporia depends on assuming )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase. )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0128 Tw
(The semantic contribution of names to the sentences in which they occur )Tj
T*
-.0604 Tw
[(is the objects to which they r)9.8(efer: when w)5.9(e)0( use )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a name, it seems )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(62)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 157.9999 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0136 Tw
[(21 )-209.8(This definition comes fr)5.8(om P)29.7(riest \(2014\) with a slight modification. I)11.9(n)0( that context, )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0178 Tw
[(P)29.7(riest uses some mer)9.8(eological notion to define nothingness. I hav)5.8(e pr)9.8(eferr)9.8(ed to av)5.9(oid )]TJ
T*
-.0597 Tw
[(such notions in the pr)9.8(esent context since they do not play any specific r)5.8(ole with r)9.8(egar)13.9(d )]TJ
T*
-.0186 Tw
[(to the pr)9.7(esent discussion. )44.8(The symbol )]TJ
/F11 1 Tf
14.8828 0 TD
0 Tw
()Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.269 0 TD
-.0186 Tw
[( stands for the ar)-7.8(ticle )59.7(the)29.7(. G)11.9(i)0(v)5.9(en a pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
-15.1518 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(F)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.533 0 TD
(, )Tj
/F12 1 Tf
.5 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.2778 0 TD
(x.F\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.263 0 TD
( is a singular term that means: the thing that is )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
18.201 0 TD
(F)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.533 0 TD
(. )Tj
-23.7541 -1.14 TD
-.0587 Tw
[(22 )-254.9(F)35.8(or a formal deriv)5.8(ation of such a contradiction, see P)29.7(riest \(2014\) or Costantini \(2020, )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(3\). )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0172 Tw
[(that w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e r)9.8(eferring to the state of nothingness. )44.9(This use dir)9.8(ectly implies )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0261 Tw
[(that ther)9.8(e is an object which is nothingness)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 250.0473 595.7981 Tm
0 Tw
(23)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 257.691 592.7981 Tm
-.0261 Tw
[(. O)5.8(nce the use of )59.8(nothing)17.8( as )]TJ
-17.0926 -1.14 TD
-.0206 Tw
[(a name is r)9.8(ecogniz)5.9(ed as fully legitimate, then one faces the aporia of noth-)]TJ
T*
.0013 Tw
[(ingness. B)11.9(ut w)5.9(e)0( argued that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e occurr)9.8(ences of the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( as )]TJ
T*
.0086 Tw
[(a noun-phrase that cannot be paraphrased away: as such, w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e commit-)]TJ
T*
-.0589 Tw
[(ted to the idea that the aporia of nothingness is a r)9.8(eal pr)5.9(oblem, contra what )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(Carnap believ)5.8(ed. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 481.1981 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0002 Tc
.0002 Tw
[(2.5)-387.6(Nothing as a c)8.1(oncept )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 467.1582 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0628 Tw
[(U)35.9(ntil no)11.9(w)74.9(,)0( w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.9(e consider)9.8(ed two ways in which w)5.8(e)0( may interpr)9.8(et the )]TJ
T*
-.0433 Tw
[(term )59.8(nothing)17.8(: as a noun-phrase, which implies the aporia of nothingness, )]TJ
T*
-.0188 Tw
[(and as a \(negated\) quantifier)59.8(, which does not allo)11.9(w the aporia to arise. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( )]TJ
T*
-.0059 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e also seen that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e occurr)9.8(ences of the term that cannot be trans-)]TJ
T*
-.0357 Tw
[(lated with a quantifier)59.8(, which implies that w)5.9(e)0( must r)9.8(ecogniz)5.9(e the legitima-)]TJ
T*
-.0225 Tw
[(cy of )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase. H)17.8(o)12(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( one might suggest that ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
T*
.0134 Tw
[(a fur)-7.8(ther way in which w)5.9(e)0( may interpr)9.8(et the term )59.8(nothing)17.8(, i.e. as a con-)]TJ
T*
.0181 Tw
[(cept. As a matter of fact, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino often speaks of the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.8473 0 TD
0 Tw
(concept)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.661 0 TD
.0181 Tw
[( of nothing-)]TJ
-23.5083 -1.14 TD
.0358 Tw
[(ness. And ev)5.8(en H)17.8(eidegger intr)5.9(oduced the pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.1273 0 TD
(to nothing, )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.3386 0 TD
[(as w)5.8(e)0( saw )]TJ
-24.4658 -1.14 TD
.1077 Tw
[(in the sentence )-23.9(The N)29.8(othing nothings)39.8(. B)11.9(ut what is a concept? I)11.9(n)0( the )]TJ
T*
.0107 Tw
[(philosophical literatur)9.8(e, the term is not always used with the same mean-)]TJ
T*
.0056 Tw
[(ing; thus, it is essential to be clear on ho)11.9(w I shall use such a term. H)17.8(e)0(r)9.8(e, I )]TJ
T*
-.0267 Tw
(shall consider a concept as)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.0093 0 TD
[( the meaning expr)9.8(essed b)5.8(y)0( a pr)9.8(edicativ)5.9(e expr)9.8(ession)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
17.9423 0 TD
0 Tw
(. )Tj
-27.9516 -1.14 TD
.2157 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, concepts ar)9.8(e what R)11.9(ussell called )59.8(p)0(r)5.9(opositional func-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(63)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 223.7208 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.071 Tw
[(23 )-125.2(I will not discuss her)9.8(e possible ways out of this contradiction. I r)9.7(efer the r)9.7(eader to )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(Costantini \(2020\) for my pr)9.8(eferr)9.8(ed solution to the parado)5.8(x of nothingness. )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0001 Tc
.0046 Tw
[(24 )-191.5(The wor)14(d )49.8(concept)17.9( is one used b)5.9(y).1( F)35.9(r)9.8(ege. F)35.9(or him, concepts ar)9.9(e unsaturated entities. )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
.1731 Tw
[(M)29.7(y)0( conception of concept is br)5.8(oadly F)35.8(r)9.8(egean in spirit, but it is not completely )]TJ
T*
.0046 Tw
[(F)35.8(r)9.7(egean. A)11.9(ccor)13.9(ding to F)35.8(r)9.7(ege, pr)9.7(edicates hav)5.8(e senses, r)9.7(efer)9.8(ences and extensions. Con-)]TJ
T*
-.0178 Tw
[(cepts ar)9.7(e the r)9.7(efer)9.7(ents of pr)9.7(edicates; their sense is the way in which they appear to us, )]TJ
T*
.0474 Tw
(and their extension is the class of objects that instantiate the concept. I find such a )Tj
T*
.0292 Tw
[(vie)-5.8(w pr)5.8(oblematic, because it considers the r)9.7(elation betw)5.8(een pr)9.8(edicates and concepts )]TJ
T*
-.049 Tw
[(similar to the r)9.7(elation betw)5.8(een names and objects; mor)9.8(eo)15.8(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.7(,)0( it is not completely clear )]TJ
T*
-.0283 Tw
[(what the senses of concepts ar)9.8(e supposed to be. As such, I will not follo)11.9(w F)35.8(r)9.8(ege in ap-)]TJ
T*
-.0376 Tw
[(plying the distinction sense/r)9.7(efer)9.8(ence to concepts, and I shall follo)11.9(w the standar)13.9(d way )]TJ
T*
.0339 Tw
[(\(due to Carnap\) of simplifying the F)35.8(r)9.8(egean vie)-5.9(w b)5.9(y)0( only distinguishing two aspects )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(of concepts: intension and extension. )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
59 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
61 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(tions)39.8()]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 89.8078 609.4781 Tm
(24)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 97.4516 606.4781 Tm
(. )Tj
-1.538 -1.14 TD
.0767 Tw
[(S)12(o)0( conceiv)5.9(ed, concepts hav)5.8(e two aspects: an intension and an exten-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0953 Tw
[(sion. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( may define the intension of a concept b)5.9(y)0( means of a possible )]TJ
T*
.1149 Tw
(world semantics: the intention of a concept is a )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
19.4783 0 TD
0 Tw
(function)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.065 0 TD
.1149 Tw
[( fr)5.9(om possible )]TJ
-22.5433 -1.14 TD
.0268 Tw
[(worlds to sets of objects. )44.9(The idea is simply that, giv)5.8(en a set of objects \(a )]TJ
T*
-.0032 Tw
(possible world\), the intentional aspect of the concept selects those objects )Tj
T*
.0865 Tw
[(that instantiate it. F)35.9(or example, consider two differ)9.8(ent worlds i.e. the )]TJ
T*
-.0297 Tw
[(ear)-7.8(th in the y)5.9(ear 55 B.C., and the ear)-7.8(th in 2020 and the concept human )]TJ
T*
.0132 Tw
[(being. )44.8(The concept will determine two differ)9.8(ent sets of objects: the set of )]TJ
T*
-.0151 Tw
[(human beings aliv)5.9(e in 55 B.C. and the set of human beings aliv)5.9(e in 2020. )]TJ
T*
-.001 Tw
[(These sets ar)9.8(e r)9.8(espectiv)5.9(ely the extension of the concept in 55 B.C. and its )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(extension in 2020. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.1335 Tw
[(O)5.8(ne might think that the only differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een a concept and a )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0202 Tw
(noun is that under a concept many objects fall, while a singular term de-)Tj
T*
-.0416 Tw
[(notes exactly one object. I)11.9(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, one might suggest that the differ-)]TJ
T*
.0399 Tw
[(ence betw)5.9(een names and concepts is just the differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een singular )]TJ
T*
.0034 Tw
[(expr)9.8(ession and general expr)9.8(ession. B)11.9(ut then, one might continue, ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
T*
-.0489 Tw
[(no r)9.8(eal differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een a singular term and a concept under which only )]TJ
T*
.0013 Tw
[(one object falls. Against this vie)-5.9(w)74.9(,)0( let us consider again the follo)12(wing sen-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(tences: )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
[(3\))-385.2(P)53.9(egasus does not exist )]TJ
T*
(3\))Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 305.5182 Tm
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 107.5439 305.5182 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 112.4831 305.5182 Tm
( )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 114.8569 305.5182 Tm
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.8(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9562 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\) )Tj
-6.7143 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
-.0152 Tw
[(S)12(ince under the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.5071 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.8(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9562 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0152 Tw
[(\) only one object falls, namely P)53.9(ega-)]TJ
-14.4086 -1.14 TD
.0414 Tw
[(sus, ther)9.8(e should be no differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een the two sentences. B)11.9(ut this is )]TJ
T*
.0423 Tw
[(clearly wr)5.9(ong. )44.9(The example sho)11.9(ws that the differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een a concept )]TJ
T*
.0096 Tw
[(and a singular term is not mer)9.8(ely a differ)9.8(ence about a singular and a gen-)]TJ
T*
-.0475 Tw
[(eral expr)9.8(ession; rather it is a differ)9.8(ence in the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.0341 0 TD
(logical functions)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.8695 0 TD
[( of the expr)9.8(es-)]TJ
-22.9036 -1.14 TD
.0111 Tw
[(sions. A name \(both singular or plural\) r)9.8(efers to something, and in vir)-7.8(tue )]TJ
T*
.0178 Tw
[(of this semantic r)9.8(efer)9.8(ence, a name makes the object to which it r)9.8(efers the )]TJ
T*
-.0419 Tw
[(subject-matter of the sentences. I)12(n)0( 3\) the subject-matter is P)53.9(egasus, i.e. the )]TJ
T*
-.0154 Tw
[(sentence is about P)53.9(egasus. P)53.9(egasus seems to hav)5.8(e to exist in or)13.9(der for 3\) to )]TJ
T*
.0354 Tw
[(be the sentence it is, and as such it is pr)5.9(oblematic. O)5.9(n)0( the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( sen-)]TJ
T*
-.0191 Tw
[(tence 3\) is not about P)53.9(egasus. )44.9(That sentence is a general sentence that de-)]TJ
T*
-.0184 Tw
[(nies that ther)9.8(e is an object that has the featur)9.8(es of being a winged horse; it )]TJ
T*
-.0309 Tw
[(is not a singular sentence about a specific object. E)29.8(v)5.8(en though the concept )]TJ
T*
.0877 Tw
[(can admit at maximum one instance \(in the counter)-7.8(factual situation in )]TJ
T*
.0067 Tw
[(which P)53.9(egasus r)9.8(eally exists\), still the general natur)9.8(e of concepts r)9.8(eemerges )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(64)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
62 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.029 Tw
[(thanks to the pr)9.8(esence of a quantifier in sentence 3\). As such, the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
0 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9562 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0129 Tw
[(\) does not r)9.8(efer to any object, and for this r)9.8(eason 3\) is a way of )]TJ
-3.6962 -1.14 TD
-.0175 Tw
[(denying the existence of a winged horse without incurring the pr)5.9(oblem of )]TJ
T*
-.0091 Tw
[(negativ)5.9(e existential sentences. I)11.9(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, 3\) does not imply the exis-)]TJ
T*
-.0449 Tw
[(tence of P)53.9(egasus, which means that the existence of the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.1853 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9562 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\) )Tj
-27.8816 -1.14 TD
[(does not imply the existence of P)53.9(egasus. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.059 Tw
[(I)5.8(f)0( w)5.9(e)0( no)11.9(w consider the concept of nothing, i.e. if w)5.9(e)0( consider the mean-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.006 Tw
[(ing \(or the intention\) of the \(ar)-7.8(tificial\) pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
18.7363 0 TD
(to nothing, )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.2551 0 TD
[(then w)5.9(e)0( must )]TJ
-22.9914 -1.14 TD
.031 Tw
(conclude the same as in the case of )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
13.8771 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.8(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9562 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0139 Tw
[(\). The )-44.9(concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
5.9602 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.031 Tw
(\) )Tj
-27.1005 -1.14 TD
-.0398 Tw
[(which w)5.9(e)0( pr)9.8(eviously intr)5.9(oduced as the concept )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 270.9103 483.3581 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 278.59 483.3581 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 287.2924 483.3581 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 295.3458 483.3581 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0398 Tw
[(\) - does not r)9.8(efer to )]TJ
-20.7145 -1.14 TD
.0333 Tw
[(any object whatsoev)5.8(er)59.8(, and so its admission does not imply the aporia of )]TJ
T*
.0212 Tw
[(nothingness. I)23.9(t)0( is natural to specify the condition of applicability of such )]TJ
T*
-.0272 Tw
[(a concept b)5.9(y)0( claiming that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.3272 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0272 Tw
[( falls under )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
4.4534 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0272 Tw
[(\) if)15.9(, and only if )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 349.4915 442.3181 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 357.1711 442.3181 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 365.8734 442.3181 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 373.9269 442.3181 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\). )Tj
-27.3966 -1.14 TD
.0195 Tw
(Then the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
7.1436 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0195 Tw
[(\) turns out to be an empty concept b)5.9(y)0( means )]TJ
-10.7106 -1.14 TD
-.0038 Tw
[(of logical necessity \(this means that in ev)5.8(er)-17.8(y possible world, the extension )]TJ
T*
.013 Tw
(of this concept is empty\))Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 169.4153 404.2782 Tm
0 Tw
(25)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 177.0589 401.2782 Tm
.013 Tw
[(. O)5.9(ne has to notice that insofar it is a concept, )]TJ
-10.2361 -1.14 TD
.0042 Tw
(the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.7474 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0042 Tw
[(\) is something, i.e. it is a self-identical object. H)17.8(o)11.9(w-)]TJ
-8.3144 -1.14 TD
-.0032 Tw
[(ev)5.8(er)59.8(, her)9.8(e the aporia of nothingness )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.8625 0 TD
(does not arise)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.8436 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
[( because ther)9.7(e is nothing )]TJ
-18.7061 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
.0608 Tw
[(that for)5.9(ces us to claim that the same concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.9562 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0608 Tw
[(\) satisfies its o)11.9(wn )]TJ
-21.5232 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(condition of application \(i.e. its o)11.9(wn definition\). )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
/F6 1 Tf
10.9996 0 0 13.2 56.6522 304.2582 Tm
-.0001 Tc
.0675 Tw
[(2.5.1 In)9.2(t)10.7(erlude: on the dif)9.7(f)24.8(e)-.1(r)13.1(ence be)5.3(tw)8.7(een P)19.9(e)-.1(g)18.5(asus and the c)8.2(oncept/no)]TJ
2.5769 -1.1364 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(tion of P)20(e)0(g)18.6(asus )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 275.5183 Tm
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0688 Tw
[(O)5.9(ne might suggest that b)5.9(y)0( admitting the existence of the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
26.2115 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(ega-)]TJ
-26.2115 -1.14 TD
[(siz)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
1.2861 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0383 Tw
[(\), w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e admitting that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.5158 0 TD
[(ther)9.8(e is a sense)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
5.3481 0 TD
[( in which the animal P)53.9(egasus )]TJ
-16.8901 -1.14 TD
.0121 Tw
[(exists. P)53.9(egasus may not exist in our spatio-temporal world, but as an idea )]TJ
T*
.0186 Tw
[(or a r)9.8(epr)9.8(esentation it exists for sur)9.8(e. I)5.9(f)0( this is tr)-7.8(ue, the same should apply )]TJ
T*
.0061 Tw
(to the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
5.8004 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0061 Tw
[(\). )44.8(The admission of it should imply the existence )]TJ
-9.3674 -1.14 TD
.0963 Tw
[(of nothingness. And this giv)5.8(es us the aporia. O)5.9(f)0( course, such objection )]TJ
T*
-.0251 Tw
[(badly fails because P)53.9(egasus is not a r)9.8(epr)9.8(esentation of P)53.9(egasus or the idea of )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(65)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 133.2939 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0369 Tw
[(25 I)5.8(f)0( w)5.8(e)0( admit such interpr)9.8(etation, then H)17.8(eidegger)19.7()79.7(s)0( sentence )-23.9(The N)29.7(othing nothings)39.7( )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0285 Tw
[(turns out to be simply false \(and not meaningless, as Carnap argued\). N)29.7(o)0( matter to )]TJ
T*
-.0462 Tw
[(which object the term N)29.7(othing)17.8( r)9.8(efers, the sentence claims that this object falls under )]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.013 Tw
(the concept )Tj
/F10 1 Tf
4.713 0 TD
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.7124 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.013 Tw
[(\). B)11.9(ut no object falls under such a concept. As a consequence, the )]TJ
-7.3325 -1.131 TD
0 Tw
(sentence is false. )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
65 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0439 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasus, just as I am not a pictur)9.8(e of myself)15.9(. )44.9(The r)9.8(epr)9.8(esentation or the idea )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0263 Tw
[(of P)53.9(egasus ar)9.8(e not winged horses, they cannot kick somebody)84.9(, they do not )]TJ
T*
-.0478 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e any w)5.9(eight, while P)53.9(egasus has all these pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties. And P)53.9(egasus has all )]TJ
T*
.0349 Tw
[(these pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties b)5.9(y)0( definition: since it is characteriz)5.9(ed as a winged horse, )]TJ
T*
-.0065 Tw
[(it must hav)5.8(e all the pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties that horses hav)5.8(e. S)12(ince P)53.9(egasus and the no-)]TJ
T*
.0932 Tw
[(tion of P)53.9(egasus satisfy differ)9.8(ent pr)5.9(oper)-7.8(ties, b)5.9(y)0( Leibniz)39.8()79.8(s)0( Law of identity)84.9(, )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(they ar)9.8(e differ)9.8(ent objects. )]TJ
11.64 0 0 12 79.361 510.7181 Tm
.0599 Tw
[(H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.9(er natural these r)9.8(emar)5.8(ks might seem, they imply that the posi-)]TJ
-1.2176 -1.14 TD
.0504 Tw
[(tion S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino defends in )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.8017 0 TD
[(The Essence of N)23.9(ihilism )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.2056 0 TD
[(\(pp)15.9(. 74-76 of the italian )]TJ
-19.0073 -1.14 TD
.0664 Tw
[(edition\) is wr)5.8(ong. )44.9(Ther)9.7(e, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino considers a passage of A)5.8(quinas, wher)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
-.047 Tw
[(A)5.9(quinas says that w)5.8(e)0( can kno)12(w what )59.7(man)69.7( or )59.7(phenix)39.7( mean without kno)12(w-)]TJ
T*
.0331 Tw
[(ing whether men or phenix)11.9(es exist)]TJ
7.566 0 0 7.8 220.5214 458.9981 Tm
0 Tw
(26)Tj
11.64 0 0 12 228.0872 455.9981 Tm
.0331 Tw
[(. S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino claims that such a position )]TJ
-13.9948 -1.14 TD
-.0152 Tw
[(is isolating)17.8( such meanings \(i.e. such notions\) fr)5.9(om their existence/being)]TJ
7.566 0 0 7.8 389.2678 445.3181 Tm
0 Tw
(27)Tj
11.64 0 0 12 396.8334 442.3181 Tm
( )Tj
-28.4919 -1.14 TD
-.0027 Tw
[(\(in the text he speaks with A)5.8(quinas of )49.7(essences)39.7(, so he claims that A)5.8(quinas )]TJ
T*
-.0093 Tw
[(is isolating essences fr)5.8(om existence/being\); but such notions S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino ar-)]TJ
T*
.0056 Tw
[(gues ar)9.8(e something, i.e. they exist, and so they ar)9.7(e par)-7.8(ticular entities: w)5.9(e)0( )]TJ
T*
-.0087 Tw
[(cannot isolate)29.8( them fr)5.8(om existence)]TJ
7.566 0 0 7.8 225.8023 390.5982 Tm
0 Tw
(28)Tj
11.64 0 0 12 233.368 387.5982 Tm
-.0087 Tw
[(. Rather)59.7(, w)5.8(e)0( should claim that w)5.9(e)0( do )]TJ
-14.4484 -1.14 TD
-.0077 Tw
[(not kno)11.9(w whether such notions, which ar)9.7(e existent and so possess )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
25.4946 0 TD
0 Tw
(being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.973 0 TD
-.0077 Tw
[( in )]TJ
-27.4676 -1.14 TD
-.0107 Tw
[(his most general sense, also possess that par)-7.8(ticular form of being that is )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
27.3599 0 TD
0 Tw
(be-)Tj
-27.3599 -1.14 TD
(ing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.161 0 TD
( )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.2017 0 TD
-.0483 Tw
[(in r)9.7(e)0(r)-7.8(um natura. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
6.3952 0 TD
[(As such, S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino concludes that P)53.9(egasus exists just be-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(66)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 306.1201 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0024 Tw
[(26 )-198.6(The passage of A)5.8(quinas is the follo)11.9(wing: )-17.8(Whatev)5.8(er is not of the understood content )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
-.0138 Tw
[(of an essence or quiddity is something which comes fr)5.8(om without and makes a com-)]TJ
T*
.028 Tw
(position with the essence, because no essence can be understood without the things )Tj
T*
-.0226 Tw
[(which ar)9.7(e par)-7.8(ts of it. N)29.7(o)11.9(w)74.8(,)0( ev)5.8(er)-17.8(y essence or quiddity can be understood without any-)]TJ
T*
.0411 Tw
[(thing being understood about its existence. F)35.8(or I can understand what a man is, or )]TJ
T*
-.0187 Tw
[(what a phoenix is, and y)5.8(et not kno)11.9(w whether they hav)5.8(e existence in the r)9.8(eal world. I)23.9(t).1( )]TJ
T*
-.0531 Tw
[(is clear)59.7(, ther)9.7(efor)9.7(e, that existence is other than essence or quiddity)84.8(, unless perhaps ther)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
.085 Tw
[(exists a thing whose quiddity is its existence)29.7( \(A)5.8(quinas 1965, chapter IV)119.6(, pp)15.8(. 159-)]TJ
T*
.0767 Tw
[(160\). A)5.9(quinas speaks of essences but for our purposes w)5.8(e)0( can r)9.8(ead it as if he w)5.8(e)0(r)9.8(e)0( )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(speaking of concepts \(in the sense of pr)5.8(opositional functions\). )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
[(27 )-196.2(H)17.8(e)0(r)9.7(e)0( I follo)11.9(w S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino in considering existence and being as synonyms. )]TJ
T*
.0235 Tw
[(28 )-172.7(I quote her)9.7(e S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino: I)17.8(s or is not the determination nothing? H)17.8(omo, )59.7(phoenix, )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0751 Tw
[(S)11.9(ocrates, )59.7(this bone or this flesh)69.7( \()]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.4322 0 TD
[(hoc os v)5.8(el haec car)5.8(o)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
7.3256 0 TD
[(\)ar)9.8(e they or ar)9.8(e they not )]TJ
-21.7578 -1.14 TD
.0937 Tw
[(nothing? )44.9(T)119.6(o)0( r)9.7(epeat in tr)-7.8(uth the gr)9.8(eat step bey)5.8(ond P)41.9(armenidesto take it, that is, )]TJ
T*
-.0242 Tw
[(without being ensnar)9.8(ed b)5.8(y)0( the P)5.8(latonic mystificationw)5.8(e hav)5.9(e to say that the deter-)]TJ
T*
.0053 Tw
[(mination r)9.7(efuses to be a N)29.7(othing insofar as it is a determination; so that not being a )]TJ
T*
.0136 Tw
[(N)29.7(othing is pr)9.8(edicated of the determination as such, and ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e is a pr)9.7(edicate that )]TJ
T*
.0295 Tw
[(can nev)5.8(er be separated fr)5.8(om it)17.8( \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 2016, par)-7.8(t I, chapter II, first paragraph of )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(the P)53.8(ostscript; p)15.8(.)0( 75 of the I)23.9(talian edition\). )]TJ
-1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0345 Tw
[(29 )-161.7(O)5.8(n)0( this point S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino writes: B)11.9(ut while the implication betw)5.8(een an essence and a )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
0 Tw
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
68 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
70 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 56.6768 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0362 Tw
[(cause it is a determination; w)5.9(e)0( simply do not kno)12(w which kind of existence )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.089 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasus possesses \(it may exist concr)9.8(etely)84.9(, abstractly or as an idea in our )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(mind\))Tj
7.566 0 0 7.8 84.5898 582.1181 Tm
(29)Tj
11.64 0 0 12 92.1555 579.1181 Tm
(. )Tj
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 565.4381 Tm
-.0281 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( such passages \(I hav)5.8(e quoted some salient par)-7.8(ts of them in footnotes )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0204 Tw
[(28 and 29\), one can clearly see that S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino fails to distinguish a notion )]TJ
T*
.0512 Tw
[(\(like )59.8(man)69.8(, )59.8(phenix)39.8( or P)53.9(egasus)39.8(\) fr)5.9(om the objects satisfying that notion. )]TJ
T*
.0324 Tw
[(F)35.9(or sur)9.8(e, )59.8(man)69.8(, )59.8(phenix)39.8( or P)53.9(egasus)39.8( ar)9.8(e somethings, and in this sense he )]TJ
T*
.0674 Tw
[(is right in saying that w)5.9(e)0( cannot )42(separate)29.8( such notions fr)5.9(om their exis-)]TJ
T*
-.0562 Tw
[(tence/being. B)11.9(ut this does not imply that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e men, or that ther)9.8(e exists )]TJ
T*
.1325 Tw
[(a phenix or P)53.9(egasus, because while a phenix is a bir)13.9(d, the notion of a )]TJ
T*
-.0193 Tw
[(phenix is not a bir)13.9(d. S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(eason to think that a thing )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.5825 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0193 Tw
[( exists in gen-)]TJ
-23.0025 -1.14 TD
-.0071 Tw
[(eral terms leaving us in the uncer)-7.8(tainty of the modes in which )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.7579 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6629 0 TD
-.0071 Tw
(exists )Tj
-25.4207 -1.14 TD
.0594 Tw
(just conflates the notions of )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.2232 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.7294 0 TD
.0594 Tw
[(\(or what w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e called the concept of )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
15.5089 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\))Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-28.2015 -1.14 TD
(with )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.9623 0 TD
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6433 0 TD
-.0267 Tw
[(itself)15.9(. A consequence of such conflation is his claim that the phenix )]TJ
-2.6057 -1.14 TD
-.0124 Tw
[(must appear if w)5.9(e)0( understand what a phenix is: again, what appears is not )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(the phenix, but the concept of the phenix. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 358.0782 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0001 Tc
.0001 Tw
[(2.6)-387.5(The thr)13.1(ee dis)11.1(tinctions and Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s r)13.1(eply t)9.7(o)-.1( Carnap)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 332.7818 358.0782 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
-22.2726 -1.17 TD
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0597 Tw
[(T)119.8(o)0( sum up what w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e done until no)11.9(w)74.9(,)0( w)5.9(e)0( pr)9.8(esented thr)9.8(ee differ)9.8(ent ways )]TJ
T*
-.0045 Tw
[(in which the wor)13.9(d )59.8(nothing)17.8( can occur in our sentences: as a quantifier)59.8(, as )]TJ
T*
.068 Tw
[(a noun-phrase, and as a concept. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( argued that the quantifier and the )]TJ
T*
.015 Tw
[(concept r)9.8(eading ar)9.8(e not pr)5.9(oblematic at all; on the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( as soon as w)5.8(e)0( )]TJ
T*
-.0617 Tw
[(admit the legitimacy of the noun-phrase interpr)9.8(etation, w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e to face the )]TJ
T*
-.0529 Tw
[(parado)5.9(x of nothingness. I)11.9(n)0( the next paragraph, w)5.9(e)0( ar)9.8(e going to expose S)11.9(ev-)]TJ
T*
-.0213 Tw
[(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution of the aporia of nothingness in the light of these distinc-)]TJ
T*
-.0256 Tw
[(tions. M)23.9(o)0(r)9.8(e)0( specifically w)5.9(e)0( shall use the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading and the con-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(67)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 70.8555 191.9809 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0211 Tw
[(par)-7.8(ticular modality of its existence \(differ)9.7(ent fr)5.9(om the one that it actually possesses\) )]TJ
T*
.0018 Tw
[(is indeed pr)5.8(oblematic, ther)9.8(e is no pr)5.8(oblem whatsoev)5.8(er with the implication betw)5.8(een )]TJ
T*
.035 Tw
[(essence \(in the sense of any essence or determination whatsoev)5.8(er: unr)9.8(eal or r)9.8(eal, in-)]TJ
T*
.1636 Tw
[(corpor)9.7(eal or corpor)9.8(eal\) and pur)9.7(e existence, i.e., existence in its transcendental )]TJ
T*
-.0144 Tw
[(sense. )44.8(T)119.6(o)0( the extent that this fabulous bir)13.9(d appears, and accor)13.9(ding to the modality of )]TJ
T*
-.0038 Tw
[(its appearing and it indeed must appear)59.7(, if )39.7(w)5.8(e can understand what a P)5.8(hoenix is)39.7( )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
.0102 Tw
[(possumus intelliger)9.7(e quid est P)5.9(hoenix)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
13.5631 0 TD
[(\)to this extent and accor)13.9(ding to this modality )]TJ
-13.8831 -1.14 TD
.0199 Tw
[(it is not a N)29.7(othing, and this not being a N)29.7(othing is immediately \(per se\) pr)9.8(edicated )]TJ
T*
.0753 Tw
[(of it, in vir)-7.8(tue of \(per\) its being a what that is in some way meaning)-5.9(ful)11.9( \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino )]TJ
T*
-.0253 Tw
[(2016, par)-7.8(t I, chapter II, first paragraph of the P)53.8(ostscript; p)15.8(.)0( 75 of the I)23.9(talian edition\). )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
0 Tw
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
71 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
73 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0513 Tw
[(cept r)9.8(eading to analyz)5.9(e such a solution. H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( befor)9.8(e doing so, it is use-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0102 Tw
[(ful to test such distinctions in r)9.8(elation to his o)12(wn r)9.8(eply to Carnap)15.9(. S)12(e)0(v)5.8(eri-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(no \(1958, p)15.9(.26 of the pr)9.8(esent v)5.8(olume\) writes: )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 552.4781 Tm
-.0211 Tw
[(The aporia of nothingness is not caused b)5.8(y)0( mer)9.7(e v)5.8(erbal suggestion. )]TJ
T*
.1784 Tw
[(S)23.9(uppose that instead of saying B)5.8(ey)5.8(ond, outside being ther)9.7(e is )]TJ
T*
.0006 Tw
[(nothing)17.8(, w)5.8(e)0( w)5.8(e)0(r)9.7(e)0( to say )-17.8(Ther)9.7(e is no positiv)5.8(e that lies outside the )]TJ
T*
-.0439 Tw
[(totality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.7(; or)59.6(, in symbols: )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 258.7003 514.8581 Tm
-.0387 Tw
(~ \()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 277.2798 514.8581 Tm
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\). )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7761 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0439 Tw
[( is out-side the to-)]TJ
-18.6608 -1.14 TD
-.0295 Tw
[(tality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.7()0( \(wher)9.7(e v)5.8(ariable )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.1861 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6405 0 TD
-.0295 Tw
[(can assume any positiv)5.8(e v)5.8(al-)]TJ
-14.8266 -1.14 TD
.0119 Tw
[(ue\). )14.9(What would still r)9.7(emain to be clarified is the meaning of that )]TJ
T*
-.0399 Tw
[()49.7(outside the totality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.7()0( which is pr)9.7(ecisely nothing, and )]TJ
T*
-.0437 Tw
[(whose pr)9.7(esence giv)5.8(es rise to the aporia. [] H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.6(,)0( in the logical )]TJ
T*
.0638 Tw
[(pr)5.8(oposition )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 149.4306 452.1581 Tm
.0562 Tw
(~ \()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 168.9398 452.1581 Tm
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\). )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.8838 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0638 Tw
[( is outside..., Carnap does not distinguish )]TJ
-8.7184 -1.14 TD
.0124 Tw
[(the logical situation in which v)5.8(ariable )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.7525 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6824 0 TD
.0124 Tw
(assumes a limited number )Tj
-15.4349 -1.14 TD
-.06 Tw
[(of positiv)5.8(e v)5.8(alues \(wher)9.7(eb)5.8(y that with r)9.7(espect to which )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.3575 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6099 0 TD
-.0601 Tw
[(is )49.7(outside)29.7(, )]TJ
-20.9675 -1.14 TD
.0186 Tw
[(bey)5.8(ond)11.9(, is a limited dimension of the positiv)5.8(e\), fr)5.8(om the logical )]TJ
T*
-.0418 Tw
[(situation in which as mentioned abo)15.8(v)5.8(e)0( )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
16.284 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6282 0 TD
-.0418 Tw
(can assume )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.4904 0 TD
0 Tw
(all )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.1442 0 TD
[(positiv)5.8(e )]TJ
-22.5469 -1.14 TD
-.0278 Tw
[(v)5.8(alues \(wher)9.7(eb)5.8(y that with r)9.7(espect to which )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
16.4684 0 TD
0 Tw
(x )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.6422 0 TD
-.0278 Tw
[(is )49.7(outside)29.7( is the v)5.8(e)0(r)-17.8(y)0( )]TJ
-17.1106 -1.14 TD
.0297 Tw
[(totality of the positiv)5.8(e\). I)23.9(t)0( is pr)9.7(ecisely in this latter case that noth-)]TJ
T*
-.0086 Tw
(ingness \(what is outside the whole\) )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
13.6612 0 TD
(manifests itself)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.2854 0 TD
(, insofar as in the )Tj
-18.9466 -1.14 TD
.128 Tw
[(pr)5.8(oposition )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 150.123 351.8382 Tm
0 Tw
(~\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 166.9238 351.8382 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\). )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.948 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.128 Tw
[( is outside the totality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.7()0( the )]TJ
-8.5956 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(meaning )49.7(outside the totality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.7()0( manifests itself)15.8(. )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 326.0382 Tm
( )Tj
T*
-.0399 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( the sentence )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 154.2917 312.3582 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 161.9714 312.3582 Tm
(\()Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 165.7346 312.3582 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 172.0616 312.3582 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\))Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 180.764 312.3582 Tm
(.)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 182.9747 312.3582 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 187.914 312.3582 Tm
( )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 189.909 312.3582 Tm
-.0399 Tw
[(is outside the totality of the positiv)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
12.5378 0 TD
(, being out-)Tj
-23.1431 -1.14 TD
-.0002 Tw
[(side the totality of the positiv)5.8(e)29.8()0( is a pr)9.8(edicativ)5.8(e term expr)9.8(essing a concept, )]TJ
T*
.135 Tw
(i.e. the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
6.5471 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.887 0 TD
.135 Tw
[(, and not a noun-phrase. H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.9(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino )]TJ
-10.4341 -1.14 TD
.104 Tw
[(tr)9.8(eats it as a singular term, for instance when he says that )59.8(the nothing )]TJ
T*
-.0274 Tw
[(\(what it is bey)5.9(ond the totality of the positiv)5.8(e\) appears)39.8( \(the pr)9.8(esence of the )]TJ
T*
.0331 Tw
[(ar)-7.8(ticle )59.8(the)29.8( and the pr)5.9(onoun )39.8(what)17.8( is a clear clue of this\). )44.9(This is strictly )]TJ
T*
-.0116 Tw
(speaking false, since what appears is )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
13.9202 0 TD
(the meaning)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.5244 0 TD
[( of the term nothing, and )]TJ
-18.4445 -1.14 TD
-.0016 Tw
[(not the nothingness. Compar)9.8(e: thanks to the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.8374 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasus\(x\))]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
3.7501 0 TD
-.0002 Tc
-.0014 Tw
( what ap-)Tj
-24.5875 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
-.056 Tw
[(pears is the notion of a winged horse, and not a winged horse. Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( po-)]TJ
T*
.0356 Tw
[(sition is not mer)9.8(ely a v)5.8(erbalistic one; rather it is based on the logical dif-)]TJ
T*
.0154 Tw
[(fer)9.8(ences betw)5.9(een quantifiers, concepts and noun-phrases. I)12(n)0( this passage, )]TJ
T*
.0842 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino just skips all these fundamental distinctions, conflating the se-)]TJ
T*
.056 Tw
[(mantics of noun-phrases and pr)9.8(edicativ)5.8(e expr)9.8(essions, and in this way he )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(believ)5.9(es he has sho)11.9(wn Carnap)49.8()79.8(s)0( position to be wr)5.9(ong)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 302.3648 137.5183 Tm
(30)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 310.0086 134.5183 Tm
(. )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(68)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 102.4787 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0078 Tw
[(30 )-188.4(This emerges ev)5.8(en mor)9.8(e clearly in a passage fr)5.9(om )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.674 0 TD
[(I)11.9(ntorno al senso del nulla )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.523 0 TD
[(\(and her)9.8(e )]TJ
-28.7508 -1.14 TD
.0355 Tw
[(translated at p)15.8(.)0( 34\): E)29.7(v)5.8(en Carnap)49.7()79.7(s)0( thesis that one must r)9.8(eplace expr)9.7(essions used in )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
0 Tw
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
74 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
76 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 604.3181 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0001 Tc
.0001 Tw
[(3.)-879.7(Sev)9.2(erino)56.1(s solution and its critic)5.8(al assessmen)9.2(t )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 590.2781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 574.4381 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0001 Tc
.0001 Tw
[(3.1)-387.5(Exposition of Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s r)13.1(esolution)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 243.9019 574.4381 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
-14.7148 -1.17 TD
( )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0803 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution is exposed in the famous chapter 4 of )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
23.4563 0 TD
[(La S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura )]TJ
-23.4563 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(O)5.9(riginaria. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.5025 0 TD
-.0086 Tw
[(H)17.8(e)0(r)9.8(e)0( w)5.9(e)0( find two formulations of the aporia and a general so-)]TJ
-4.5025 -1.14 TD
-.0474 Tw
[(lution for both of them. I)12(n)0( the pr)9.8(evious chapters of his book, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino had )]TJ
T*
.0066 Tw
[(intr)5.9(oduced his way of expr)9.8(essing the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction: )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
27.0965 0 TD
0 Tw
(the )Tj
-27.0965 -1.14 TD
-.0512 Tw
(being is not the not-being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
9.0882 0 TD
[(. I)11.9(n)0( this formulation w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e the wor)13.9(d )59.8(not-being)17.8(, )]TJ
-9.0882 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(and this raises \(the first formulation of)-109.8(\) the pr)5.9(oblem of nothingness: )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 451.6782 Tm
-.0498 Tw
[(N)29.7(o)11.9(w)74.7(,)0( pr)9.7(ecisely because it is r)-7.8(uled out that being is nothing, in or)13.9(der )]TJ
T*
.1589 Tw
[(for this ex)11.9(clusion to subsist, nothingness is )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.7343 0 TD
0 Tw
(posited)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.498 0 TD
(, )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.6589 0 TD
[(pr)9.7(esent)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.5183 0 TD
.1589 Tw
(, and )Tj
-23.4094 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(ther)9.7(efor)9.7(e )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.6558 0 TD
(is)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.54 0 TD
-.0248 Tw
[(. )44.8(Ther)9.7(e is a discourse on nothingness, and this discourse )]TJ
-4.1958 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(attests to the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
5.128 0 TD
(being )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.223 0 TD
[(of nothingness. \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 1, p)15.8(.)0( 12\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 400.7982 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
[(The second formulation is as follo)12(ws: )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 360.4782 Tm
-.0368 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, if not-being is not, it cannot ev)5.8(en be stated that be-)]TJ
T*
.0995 Tw
(ing is not not-being, since not-being, in this statement, in some )Tj
T*
0 Tw
[(way is. \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 3, p)15.8(.)0( 13\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 322.1383 Tm
( )Tj
T*
.0597 Tw
[(S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution is based on the differ)9.8(ence betw)5.9(een what he calls )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0341 Tw
[(the positivity of meaning)-5.9(fulness \(positiv)5.8(o significar)9.8(e\) of a meaning or an )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(entity)84.9(, and its determinate content: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 254.4583 Tm
.0215 Tw
[(E)29.7(v)5.8(er)-17.8(y meaning \(ev)5.8(er)-17.8(y thinkable content, which is to say ev)5.8(er)-17.8(y en-)]TJ
T*
.107 Tw
[(tity)84.7(, ho)11.9(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(er it may constitute itself)-109.6(\) is a semantic synthesis be-)]TJ
T*
.0873 Tw
[(tw)5.8(een the positivity of meaning)-5.8(fulness and the determinate con-)]TJ
T*
.087 Tw
[(tent of positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness; [] it is clear that the meaning )]TJ
T*
.0315 Tw
[()59.6(nothingness)39.7( is self-contradictor)-17.8(y)84.7(,)0( which is to say a contradiction, )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(69)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 70.8555 155.7472 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0418 Tw
[(common parlance such as )-17.8(Ther)9.8(e is nothing outside)29.7( with expr)9.8(essions such as )-17.8(Ther)9.8(e )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0236 Tw
[(is not something that is outside)29.7( dispr)5.9(o)15.8(v)5.8(es what it affirms: for )59.7(ther)9.8(e is not)17.8( or )59.7(not )]TJ
T*
.0204 Tw
[(being ther)9.7(e)29.7()0( is another synonym of )59.7(nothing)17.8( \(as long as one does not take account )]TJ
T*
-.0347 Tw
[( as happens with Carnap)15.8(, b)5.8(y)0( contrast to H)17.8(eidegger of the differ)9.7(ent semantic status )]TJ
T*
.0847 Tw
[(which is determined b)5.9(y)0( )59.7(ther)9.8(e)29.7()0( in these expr)9.8(essions and understands them as syn-)]TJ
T*
.1141 Tw
[(onyms of being)17.8(\). )44.8(That something, which w)5.8(e)0( would expect to be outside, )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
30.3002 0 TD
(is not )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-30.3002 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(means that )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.468 0 TD
(it )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.812 0 TD
[(is nothing)17.8(. )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
77 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
79 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 607.1981 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.1105 Tw
[(it is being meaning)-5.8(ful as a contradiction: the v)5.8(e)0(r)-17.8(y)0( contradiction )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0507 Tw
[(wher)9.7(eb)5.8(y the positivity of this meaning)-5.8(fulness is contradicted b)5.8(y)0( the )]TJ
T*
-.018 Tw
[(absolute negativity of the meaning)-5.8(ful content. \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 6, )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(p)15.8(.)0( 14\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 556.3181 Tm
( )Tj
T*
-.023 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino distinguishes the existence of an entity or a meaning fr)5.9(om the )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0441 Tw
[(determinate content of that entity/meaning. I)12(n)0( the case of the notion of )]TJ
T*
.0133 Tw
(nothingness, he distinguishes the fact that the notion exists, and so it is a )Tj
T*
.0092 Tw
[(positiv)5.9(e determination \(a being\), fr)5.9(om its content \(i.e. its definition\) that )]TJ
T*
-.0322 Tw
[(indicates the absolute absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything. )44.9(The meaning )59.8(nothingness)39.8( is )]TJ
T*
-.0395 Tw
[(a synthesis of these two sides; in par)-7.8(ticular it is a self-contradictor)-17.8(y synthe-)]TJ
T*
.0088 Tw
[(sis because its content \(the absolute absence of ev)5.9(er)-17.8(ything\) contradicts its )]TJ
T*
-.0458 Tw
[(being a positiv)5.8(e determination, i.e. the fact that it is something. )44.8(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, )]TJ
T*
-.0227 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino explicitly ackno)11.9(wledges the existence of a self-contradictor)-17.8(y con-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(cept)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 84.1248 422.5182 Tm
(31)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 91.7686 419.5182 Tm
(. )Tj
-1.0548 -1.14 TD
-.0546 Tw
[(F)35.9(or S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino, such an existence is not a counter)9.8(example to the P)29.8(rinciple )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0397 Tw
[(of N)29.8(on-Contradiction, and the r)9.8(eason for this constitutes his r)9.8(esolution of )]TJ
T*
.0139 Tw
[(the aporia. S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( v)5.8(ersion of the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction does )]TJ
T*
.0154 Tw
[(not affirm the nonexistence of the self-contradictor)-17.8(y concept of nothing-)]TJ
T*
-.0519 Tw
[(ness, but rather affirms that the )59.8(nothingness)39.8( has a differ)9.8(ent meaning fr)5.9(om )]TJ
T*
.0503 Tw
[(the being)17.8(: it affirms that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.3258 0 TD
0 Tw
(being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.973 0 TD
.0503 Tw
[( and )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
2.0386 0 TD
0 Tw
(not-being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.484 0 TD
.0503 Tw
[( ar)9.8(e differ)9.8(ent meanings. I)12(n)0( )]TJ
-17.8215 -1.14 TD
.0024 Tw
[(other wor)13.9(ds, the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction r)9.8(equir)9.8(es that ther)9.8(e is no )]TJ
T*
.1645 Tw
(contradiction within the content \(i.e. the definition\) of the notion of )Tj
T*
.0378 Tw
(nothingness, and it does not forbid that this content contradicts the fact )Tj
T*
-.0089 Tw
[(that the notion is a positiv)5.8(e determination. )44.9(The concept of nothingness is )]TJ
T*
-.0601 Tw
[(a synthesis of two moments which ar)9.8(e not contradictor)-17.8(y: the contradiction )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(only r)9.8(egar)13.9(ds the synthesis itself)15.9(. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.033 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino then applies this general solution to the two formulations of )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0327 Tw
[(the pr)5.9(oblem of nothingness. )44.8(The solution to the first formulation is as fol-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(lo)12(ws: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 187.6783 Tm
-.0597 Tw
[(As r)9.7(egar)13.9(ds the first aporia pr)9.7(esented, w)5.8(e)0( will answ)5.8(er b)5.8(y)0( ackno)11.9(wledg-)]TJ
T*
.0482 Tw
[(ing that, cer)-7.8(tainly)84.7(, nothingness is; y)5.8(et not in the sense that )59.6(noth-)]TJ
T*
.0019 Tw
[(ingness)39.7( means being)17.8(: in this sense, nothingness is not, and being )]TJ
T*
-.0363 Tw
[(is [] )14.8(W)77.7(e)0( thus state that nothingness is, in the sense that a positiv)5.8(e )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(70)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 100.2777 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0527 Tw
[(31 )-143.5(M)11.9(any authors hav)5.8(e thought this to be a pr)5.8(oblem; see for instance )14.9(V)9.7(isentin \(2011\), )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(D)11.9(on \(2008\). )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
80 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
82 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 607.1981 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0421 Tw
[(meaning)-5.8(fulness a being is meaning)-5.8(ful as the absolutely negativ)5.8(e )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0511 Tw
[([] or)59.6(, nothingness is, in the sense that the meaning )59.6(nothing)17.8( is )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(self-contradictor)-17.8(y)84.7(.)0( \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 8, pp)15.8(. 15-16\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 568.8581 Tm
( )Tj
T*
[(And with r)9.8(egar)13.9(d to the second formulation, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino writes: )]TJ
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 542.2181 Tm
( )Tj
T*
-.0071 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( other wor)13.9(ds, in its r)9.7(efer)9.7(ence to nothingness, being ex)11.9(cludes it as )]TJ
T*
.1718 Tw
[(its contradictor)-17.8(y only insofar as it r)9.7(efers to nothingness-as-mo-)]TJ
T*
-.0211 Tw
[(ment; besides, this moment stands in r)9.7(elation to the moment of its )]TJ
T*
.061 Tw
[(positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness, and thr)5.8(ough this r)9.7(elation which is the )]TJ
T*
-.0124 Tw
[(v)5.8(e)0(r)-17.8(y)0( contradictoriness of )59.6(nothing)17.8( as a concr)9.7(ete meaning )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.7501 0 TD
0 Tw
[(endur)9.7(es )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
-22.7501 -1.14 TD
(or )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.1985 0 TD
.1305 Tw
(is capable of )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.0804 0 TD
[(standing in a r)9.7(elation of contradiction to being. )]TJ
-6.2788 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(\(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 10, p)15.8(.)0( 18\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 441.1781 Tm
( )Tj
T*
-.0291 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( addition to his r)9.8(esolution, S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino pr)9.8(esents a diagnosis of the rising )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0563 Tw
[(of the aporia: the pr)5.9(oblem originates fr)5.9(om the fact that w)5.9(e)0( tend to consider )]TJ
T*
-.0494 Tw
(the two sides of the synthesis \(of which the notion of nothingness consists\) )Tj
T*
-.0016 Tw
[(as two independent and not-r)9.8(elated entities. )14.9(When one considers the two )]TJ
T*
.0967 Tw
[(moments as being independent fr)5.9(om each other \(in other wor)13.9(ds, when )]TJ
T*
-.0415 Tw
[(one separates them\), and on the basis of such separation one considers the )]TJ
T*
.0617 Tw
(concept of nothingness, one is naturally led to consider the determinate )Tj
T*
.1669 Tw
[(content of the concept \(i.e. what S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino calls the )59.8(null-moment)17.8(\) as )]TJ
T*
-.0454 Tw
[(something \(as a positiv)5.8(e being\), and so one finds oneself within the aporia. )]TJ
T*
-.0379 Tw
[(I)12(n)0( this way)84.9(, one finds oneself in the situation of considering the content of )]TJ
T*
.0073 Tw
[(the notion, which is only a side of the contradictor)-17.8(y concept of )59.8(nothing-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(ness)39.8(, as the whole notion: )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
10.78 0 0 11 85.0285 250.3783 Tm
.0459 Tw
[(The apor)9.7(etic argument instead keeps the moments of self-contra-)]TJ
T*
.0149 Tw
[(dictoriness abstractly separate, and b)5.8(y)0( considering nothingness-as-)]TJ
T*
.0084 Tw
[(moment, finds it as something which lets itself be consider)9.7(ed, and )]TJ
T*
.0079 Tw
[(which ther)9.7(efor)9.7(e )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.2933 0 TD
0 Tw
(is)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.54 0 TD
.0079 Tw
[(; that is to say: it finds pr)9.7(ecisely that fr)5.8(om which )]TJ
-6.8333 -1.14 TD
-.0144 Tw
[(it has sought to pr)9.7(escind \(the other moment\) b)5.8(y)0( considering noth-)]TJ
T*
.1329 Tw
(ingness-as-moment abstractly; it finds the being of nothingness. )Tj
T*
0 Tw
[([] \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 9, p)15.8(.)0( 17\) )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 134.6383 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
-.0001 Tc
.0001 Tw
[(3.2)-387.5(Critic)8.2(al assessmen)9.2(t of Sev)9.7(erino)60.9(s solution )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 120.5984 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
( )Tj
0 -1.15 TD
.0819 Tw
[(I)23.9(t)0( is no)12(w time to critically analyz)5.9(e S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution of the aporia of )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(nothingness. )44.9(The key idea of S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution is giv)5.8(en b)5.9(y)0( two claims: )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(71)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
83 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
86 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(A\))-262.2(The meaning nothing\(ness\) is self-contradictor)-17.8(y; )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0209 Tw
[(B\))-280.2(The determinate of the meaning nothing\(ness\) is a consistent con-)]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0346 Tw
[(tent \(it does not imply b)5.9(y)0( itself any contradiction: this is the seman-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(tic moment the null-moment of the synthesis\). )Tj
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
-.0261 Tw
[(As mentioned in 2, and the exposition of S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( r)9.8(esolution should )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.12 TD
-.016 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e made clear)59.8(, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino does not explicitly distinguish the differ)9.8(ent log-)]TJ
T*
-.0542 Tw
[(ical functions that the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( can assume. I)23.9(t)0( is thus natural to won-)]TJ
T*
.0812 Tw
[(der whether w)5.9(e)0( should interpr)9.8(et S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( speech of nothingness as ex-)]TJ
T*
.0426 Tw
[(pr)9.8(essing a noun-phrase interpr)9.8(etation or a concept interpr)9.8(etation \(in the )]TJ
T*
-.0298 Tw
[(specific sense of concept as pr)5.9(opositional function that w)5.8(e)0( intr)5.9(oduced ear-)]TJ
T*
-.0188 Tw
[(lier\). F)35.9(or sur)9.8(e, w)5.9(e)0( can outright dismiss the quantificational interpr)9.8(etation. )]TJ
T*
.0407 Tw
[(I)23.9(t)0( is clear that this is not the r)9.8(eading pr)9.8(esupposed b)5.9(y)0( S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formula-)]TJ
T*
-.0582 Tw
[(tion of the pr)5.9(oblem. )44.9(The quantificational interpr)9.8(etation does not allo)11.9(w the )]TJ
T*
-.0576 Tw
[(aporia to arise, and as such it cannot be the right r)9.8(eading)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 314.7056 420.117 Tm
0 Tw
(32)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 322.3494 417.117 Tm
-.0576 Tw
[(. B)11.9(ut what about )]TJ
-21.8672 -1.12 TD
.1612 Tw
[(the other two interpr)9.8(etations? F)33.9(irst, I shall consider the interpr)9.8(etation )]TJ
T*
-.0063 Tw
[(based on the concept of as intr)5.9(oduced in 2.4. I shall argue that the con-)]TJ
T*
.0358 Tw
[(tent of such a concept is per)-7.8(fectly consistent \(it does not imply any con-)]TJ
T*
.0688 Tw
[(tradiction\), and so such a r)9.8(eading makes thesis B\) of S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution )]TJ
T*
-.06 Tw
[(tr)-7.8(ue. H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( I shall sho)12(w that thesis A\) does not hold for )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.2813 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.887 0 TD
-.06 Tw
[(. S)12(ec-)]TJ
-26.1683 -1.12 TD
-.0386 Tw
[(ond, I shall consider the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading. I)11.9(n)0( this case, thesis A\) holds, )]TJ
T*
-.0487 Tw
[(since this r)9.8(eading implies a contradiction; ho)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( I shall argue that thesis )]TJ
T*
-.0214 Tw
[(B\) does not hold, since the contradiction follo)12(ws fr)5.9(om the same )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.5367 0 TD
0 Tw
(content)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.66 0 TD
-.0214 Tw
[( of )]TJ
-27.1967 -1.12 TD
0 Tw
[(the noun-phrase )59.8(nothing)17.8(. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.12 TD
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(72)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.7 0 0 10 65.1881 246.4083 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0747 Tw
[(32 )-136.4(S)11.9(imionato \(2017\) dev)5.8(elops a solution of the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
19.1912 0 TD
0 Tw
(aporia )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.6857 0 TD
.0747 Tw
(of nothingness that combines a )Tj
-20.4158 -1.14 TD
-.0531 Tw
[(noun-phrase interpr)9.7(etation with a quantificational one. A)11.9(ccor)13.9(ding to such an account, )]TJ
T*
.0037 Tw
[(the term )59.7(nothingness)39.7( r)9.8(efers to an abstract object the empty world which is char-)]TJ
T*
.0348 Tw
[(acteriz)5.9(ed as the world which contains )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.8341 0 TD
(no objects)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.5528 0 TD
[( \(quantifier r)9.8(eading\). )44.8(The pr)5.8(oposal is )]TJ
-18.387 -1.14 TD
-.0432 Tw
[(clev)5.9(er and cunning, and in a cer)-7.8(tain way it r)9.8(eformulates in a rigor)5.9(ous setting S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( )]TJ
T*
.0093 Tw
[(o)12(wn pr)5.8(oposal. I am not going to deal with S)11.9(imionato)49.7()79.7(s)0( account her)9.8(e for a simple r)9.8(e)0(a-)]TJ
T*
-.0147 Tw
[(son: this paper is about S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( solution, and ev)5.9(en if his account is indebted to that )]TJ
T*
.0857 Tw
[(of S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino, it is ultimately incompatible with S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( philosophy \(and ther)9.7(efor)9.8(e )]TJ
T*
.0502 Tw
[(cannot be an interpr)9.7(etation of S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( o)11.9(wn account\). )44.8(The determinate content of )]TJ
T*
.004 Tw
[(the meaning )59.7(nothingness)39.7( is formulated b)5.9(y)0( means of the quantified sentence )59.7(ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
T*
.079 Tw
[(no thing in the empty world)12(. I)5.8(f)0( this notion is consistent, as S)11.9(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( solution r)9.8(e)0(-)]TJ
T*
.0686 Tw
[(quir)9.7(es, then the notion of empty world must be a consistent notion, i.e. the empty )]TJ
T*
.0644 Tw
[(world must be a possible world. B)12(ut this contradicts the claim that ther)9.8(e ar)9.8(e things )]TJ
T*
.0894 Tw
(which exist necessarily: to exist necessarily means to exist in all possible worlds. As )Tj
T*
0 Tw
[(such, S)11.9(imionato)49.7()79.7(s)0( account is incompatible with S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( o)12(wn account. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
87 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
89 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
10.9996 0 0 13.2 56.6522 605.2181 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0001 Tc
.0001 Tw
[(3.2.1 Fir)17(s)11.1(t)-.1( in)9.2(t)10.7(erpr)13.1(e)5.3(t)12.1(a)9.2(tion: nothing)-40.6( as the c)8.2(oncept )]TJ
/F7 1 Tf
20.7773 0 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
(nothing\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 331.1425 605.2181 Tm
( )Tj
-22.1332 -1.1283 TD
( )Tj
11.64 0 0 12 56.6768 578.238 Tm
.0513 Tw
[(I)11.9(n)0( 2.4 w)5.8(e)0( hav)5.9(e seen that in a sentence like )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 262.9588 578.238 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 276.8223 578.238 Tm
.0513 Tw
[(x P)53.9(egasiz)5.8(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
3.6776 0 TD
0 Tw
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0513 Tw
(\) the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
-23.3304 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.9(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9563 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0574 Tw
[(\) does not r)9.8(efer to P)53.9(egagus, and mor)9.7(e generally ther)9.8(e is no r)9.8(elation )]TJ
-3.6963 -1.14 TD
.0299 Tw
[(betw)5.8(een that concept and P)53.9(egasus \(since the latter does not exist\). )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( ar-)]TJ
T*
-.0483 Tw
(gued that to think that )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
8.8163 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.9(egasiz)5.8(e)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.9563 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0483 Tw
[(\) r)9.8(efers to P)53.9(egasus means to confuse a con-)]TJ
-12.5125 -1.14 TD
.0931 Tw
[(cept with a noun-phrase. As a consequence, when w)5.8(e)0( consider the term )]TJ
T*
.0103 Tw
[()59.7(nothing)17.8( as expr)9.7(essing a concept the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
18.3539 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0103 Tw
[(\) w)5.8(e)0( must con-)]TJ
-21.9209 -1.14 TD
.0608 Tw
(clude that )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.2186 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0608 Tw
[(\) does not r)9.7(efer to anything, but rather it is mer)9.8(ely a )]TJ
-7.7856 -1.1978 TD
-.0146 Tw
[(cer)-7.8(tain kind of intension \()]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.0403 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0146 Tw
[(\). O)5.8(f)0( course, )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
5.0543 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0146 Tw
(\) has an empty exten-)Tj
-20.2486 -1.131 TD
.0214 Tw
[(sion, in fact no object at all falls under it. And it is empty b)5.9(y)0( necessity: in )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0469 Tw
[(all possible worlds, its extension is empty)84.9(. I)11.9(n)0( a sev)5.8(erinian jargon, w)5.8(e)0( may )]TJ
T*
-.0262 Tw
(say that what the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
9.9417 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0262 Tw
(\) denotes is the absolute absence \(of ev-)Tj
-13.5087 -1.14 TD
.0378 Tw
[(er)-17.8(ything\); ho)12(w)5.8(e)0(v)5.8(er her)9.7(e the v)5.9(erb )49.7(denote)29.8( does not expr)9.7(ess any r)9.7(elation of )]TJ
T*
.0942 Tw
[(r)9.7(efer)9.7(ence. I)12(n)0( so far as w)5.8(e)0( define the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.867 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0942 Tw
[(\) b)5.9(y)0( means of the )]TJ
-21.434 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(pr)9.7(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.7616 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 105.3502 399.8121 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 113.3215 399.8121 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0133 Tw
[(, then S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( claim that the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradic-)]TJ
-5.2864 -1.14 TD
.07 Tw
[(tion r)9.8(equir)9.8(es that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.0934 0 TD
(the content)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.085 0 TD
[( of the concept of nothing is consistent \(i.e. )]TJ
-11.1784 -1.14 TD
-.0411 Tw
[(that the nothingness-as-moment is a not-contradictor)-17.8(y meaning\) turns out )]TJ
T*
.0083 Tw
[(to be tr)-7.8(ue: the pr)9.7(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
9.5018 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 172.166 358.7721 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 180.1373 358.7721 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0083 Tw
[( is a per)-7.8(fectly defined pr)9.8(edicate \(in first-or)13.9(der )]TJ
-11.0266 -1.14 TD
-.0404 Tw
[(logic with identity\). S)12(ince ev)5.9(er)-17.8(ything is self-identical, no object can fall un-)]TJ
T*
-.0019 Tw
[(der it. O)5.8(ne has to notice, ho)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.7(,)0( that the other S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erinian claim accor)13.9(d-)]TJ
T*
-.0072 Tw
[(ing to which the concept of nothingness is self-contradictor)-17.8(y \(being a syn-)]TJ
T*
.0225 Tw
[(thesis of )59.7(positivity meaning)-5.8(fulness)39.7( and its determinate content\) does not )]TJ
T*
-.0167 Tw
[(follo)12(w)74.8(.)0( )44.9(The existence of the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.952 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0167 Tw
[(\) does not r)9.7(equir)9.8(e that )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
8.9872 0 TD
0 Tw
(noth-)Tj
-26.5061 -1.14 TD
(ing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.161 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0544 Tw
[(\) falls under itself)15.9(. )44.9(The concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
11.8797 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0544 Tw
[(\) does not satisfy its o)11.9(wn con-)]TJ
-17.3477 -1.14 TD
-.0612 Tw
[(dition of application, and this pr)9.8(ev)5.8(ents it to be a self-contradictor)-17.8(y concept. )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 70.8555 249.3322 Tm
.0521 Tw
[(Considering concepts as the meaning of pr)9.8(edictiv)5.8(e expr)9.8(essions allo)12(ws )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.047 Tw
(us to claim that the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.2771 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.047 Tw
[(\) does not r)9.8(efer to any object, and )]TJ
-14.8442 -1.14 TD
.0141 Tw
[(that it is a per)-7.8(fectly consistent meaning. )44.9(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, ther)9.8(e is no contradic-)]TJ
T*
-.0361 Tw
[(tion in considering a concept that expr)9.8(esses the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything. I)23.9(t)0( is )]TJ
T*
.0948 Tw
[(per)-7.8(fectly meaning)-5.9(ful to claim that )59.8(the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything)17.8( is some-)]TJ
T*
.1391 Tw
[(thing meaning)-5.9(ful, because this simply means that ther)9.8(e is the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
T*
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\))Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 102.3937 170.2522 Tm
(33)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 110.0375 167.2522 Tm
.0968 Tw
[(, and not that a par)-7.8(ticular object \(the r)9.8(efer)9.8(ent of the noun-)]TJ
-4.537 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(phrase )59.8(the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything)17.8(\) has contradictor)-17.8(y featur)9.8(es. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(73)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6825 120.8706 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0057 Tw
[(33 )-190.5(O)5.8(nce again, r)9.7(ecognizing the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
15.797 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0057 Tw
[(\) amounts to r)9.8(ecognizing that ther)9.8(e is )]TJ
-17.9178 -1.14 TD
-.0024 Tw
[(the meaning )59.7(nothingness)39.7( and not that ther)9.7(e is the state \(object\) nothingness, in the )]TJ
T*
-.005 Tw
[(same way as r)9.7(ecognizing the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.2854 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)53.8(egasiz)5.8(e\(x\))]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.0163 0 TD
-.0001 Tc
-.0049 Tw
[( amounts to r)9.6(ecognizing that ther)9.7(e is )]TJ
-18.3017 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(the meaning of P)53.8(egasus \(winged horse\) and not that ther)9.7(e is P)53.8(egasus. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
90 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
92 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0024 Tw
[(I)23.9(t)0( is impor)-7.8(tant to notice ho)11.9(w the distinction betw)5.8(een the )59.8(positivity of )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0582 Tw
[(meaning)-5.9(fulness)39.8( \(positiv)5.8(o significar)9.8(e\) and its determinate content is pr)9.8(e-)]TJ
T*
.0322 Tw
[(ser)-17.8(v)5.9(ed when w)5.9(e)0( consider concepts as the meanings of pr)9.8(edicativ)5.8(e expr)9.8(es-)]TJ
T*
.0084 Tw
[(sions. )44.9(The content of the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.2016 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0084 Tw
[(\) is simply giv)5.8(en b)5.9(y)0( its defini-)]TJ
-16.7686 -1.14 TD
.1107 Tw
(tion \()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
2.2557 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 96.6575 551.7581 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 104.711 551.7581 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.1107 Tw
[(\); its )59.8(positivity of meaning)-5.9(fulness)39.8( is giv)5.8(en b)5.9(y)0( the )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.1631 0 TD
0 Tw
(existence)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.121 0 TD
.1107 Tw
[( of )]TJ
-27.0646 -1.14 TD
.1051 Tw
[(such definition. As a consequence, it is per)-7.8(fectly legitimate to vie)-5.8(w the )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
3.3853 0 TD
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.1143 Tw
[(\) as a synthesis of these two sides. B)11.9(ut, as w)5.9(e)0( alr)9.8(eady )]TJ
-6.9523 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(kno)11.9(w)74.9(,)0( ther)9.8(e is no contradiction betw)5.9(een these two sides. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
/F6 1 Tf
10.9996 0 0 13.2 65.1748 468.4181 Tm
[(3.2.2)-551.5(Sec)8.3(ond in)9.3(t)10.8(erpr)13.2(e)5.4(t)12.2(a)9.3(tion: nothing)-40.5( as a nounphr)20.5(ase )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 454.6782 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.15 TD
-.0128 Tw
[(D)5.9(espite the fact that S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino often speaks of the concept of nothing, one )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.002 Tw
[(may insist that what he r)9.8(eally has in mind is not a concept in the sense of )]TJ
T*
-.0009 Tw
[(a pr)5.9(opositional function, but rather he is r)9.8(eferring to )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-)]TJ
T*
.0682 Tw
[(phrase. And this would be confirmed b)5.9(y)0( a wide range of occurr)9.8(ences of )]TJ
T*
.0378 Tw
[(nothing as a noun-phrase in his wor)5.9(k. F)35.9(or instance, )59.8(nothing)17.8( as )59.8(not-be-)]TJ
T*
.0226 Tw
[(ing)17.8( appears as a noun in S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formulation of the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(Contradiction \(the being is not \(identical to\) the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
19.004 0 TD
(not-being)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.484 0 TD
(\). )Tj
11.64 0 0 12 79.361 345.1182 Tm
.0471 Tw
[(W)77.8(e)0( alr)9.8(eady argued in 2 that the admission of the legitimacy of some )]TJ
-1.2176 -1.14 TD
-.0282 Tw
[(occurr)9.8(ences of )59.7(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase leads dir)9.8(ectly to parado)5.8(x. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( de-)]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
.0239 Tw
[(fined )59.7(nothingness)39.7( as the absence of ev)5.8(er)-17.8(ything: )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 284.765 317.0642 Tm
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 287.7972 317.0642 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 292.686 317.0642 Tm
(.)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 301.5794 317.0642 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0239 Tw
[(\). )14.8(W)77.8(e)0( hav)5.9(e also )]TJ
-22.6356 -1.131 TD
.021 Tw
(seen that the semantic contribution of a noun-phrase to the meaning of a )Tj
0 -1.14 TD
-.0422 Tw
[(sentence is the object \(or the objects\) to which it r)9.8(efers. )44.9(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, the term )]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
.0463 Tw
[()59.7(nothingness)39.7( r)9.7(efers to an object which r)9.8(espects the condition )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.0795 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0463 Tw
[(. I)12(nfor-)]TJ
-25.6665 -1.131 TD
-.0096 Tw
[(mally)84.9(, w)5.8(e)0( may call this object the state of nothingness, or simply the noth-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0202 Tw
[(ingness. B)17.8(y)0( definition, nothingness turns out to be a non-self-identical ob-)]TJ
T*
.1166 Tw
[(ject. B)11.9(ut ev)5.9(er)-17.8(y object is self-identical, so the object nothingness is both )]TJ
T*
.0643 Tw
[(identical to itself and is not identical to itself)15.9(. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( thus hav)5.8(e a contradic-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(tion)Tj
7.566 0 0 7.8 83.5213 210.1463 Tm
(34)Tj
11.64 0 0 12 91.087 207.1463 Tm
(. )Tj
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 193.4663 Tm
-.0489 Tw
[(When w)5.9(e)0( interpr)9.8(et the term )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase, w)5.9(e)0( immediate-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0545 Tw
[(ly face the aporia of nothingness. )44.9(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, one might conclude, this is )]TJ
T*
.0055 Tw
[(the corr)9.8(ect way of understanding S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formulation of the aporia. As )]TJ
T*
.0022 Tw
[(a matter of fact, thesis A\) of his r)9.8(esolution is no)11.9(w satisfied: nothingness is )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(74)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.1864 97.6695 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.1258 Tw
[(34 Again, I r)9.7(efer the r)9.8(eader to P)29.7(riest \(2014\) or Costantini \(2020, 3\) for a rigor)5.9(ous )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(deriv)5.9(ation of the contradiction. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
93 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
95 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0327 Tw
[(a self-contradictor)-17.8(y notion. H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( in this setting, thesis B\) turns out to )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0164 Tw
[(be false. I)12(n)0( fact, w)5.9(e)0( cannot claim that the determinate content of the no-)]TJ
T*
-.0493 Tw
[(tion of nothing \(the null-moment\) is consistent \(r)9.8(ecall that this is what the )]TJ
T*
.1063 Tw
[(P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction r)9.8(equir)9.8(es\), and that the contradiction is )]TJ
T*
-.0381 Tw
[(giv)5.8(en b)5.9(y)0( the synthesis of the positivity of meaning)-5.9(fulness and the determi-)]TJ
T*
.0084 Tw
[(nate content of such positivity)84.9(. I)11.9(n)0( fact, the content of nothing as a noun-)]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.0136 Tw
[(phrase is not simply the pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.0687 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0136 Tw
[( anymor)9.8(e, but rather the object sat-)]TJ
-14.6558 -1.1888 TD
.0355 Tw
(isfying the definition )Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 155.6956 509.4381 Tm
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 158.7589 509.4381 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 163.6982 509.4381 Tm
(.)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 172.6832 509.4381 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0355 Tw
(\). And this is an inconsistent object since )Tj
-12.1911 -1.131 TD
-.0023 Tw
(it is not identical to itself)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 169.76 498.8661 Tm
0 Tw
(35)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 177.4037 495.8661 Tm
-.0001 Tc
-.0022 Tw
[(. I)5.8(f)-.1( w)5.8(e)-.1( claimed that the content is to be identi-)]TJ
-10.2654 -1.1978 TD
0 Tc
.0093 Tw
[(fied with the meaning of the pr)9.8(edicate )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
15.316 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0093 Tw
[(, then w)5.8(e)0( would tr)9.8(eat the no-)]TJ
-16.9031 -1.131 TD
.0042 Tw
[(tion of nothing not as a noun-phrase but as a concept \(w)5.8(e would be back )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0325 Tw
[(to the case discussed abo)15.9(v)5.9(e\). Considering )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase com-)]TJ
T*
.1352 Tw
[(mits ourselv)5.8(es to a contradictor)-17.8(y object the \(state of)-109.8(\) nothingness )]TJ
T*
.1891 Tw
[(which dir)9.8(ectly violates the P)29.8(rinciple of N)29.8(on-Contradiction. )44.9(Thesis B\) )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(abo)15.9(v)5.8(e)0( cannot be satisfied. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0436 Tw
[(Again, let us consider the distinction betw)5.9(een the positivity of mean-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0268 Tw
[(ing)-5.9(fulness and its determinate content, when )59.8(nothingness)39.8( is tr)9.8(eated as a )]TJ
T*
.0194 Tw
[(noun-phrase. O)5.9(f)0( course, the linguistic term has a meaning, which is cap-)]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.0363 Tw
[(tur)9.8(ed b)5.9(y)0( the definition )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 2.2914 11 160.8764 357.7862 Tm
0 Tw
(')Tj
/F12 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 163.4293 357.7862 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 166.4243 357.7862 Tm
(x.)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 174.3036 357.7862 Tm
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 181.0779 357.7862 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0363 Tw
(\) \(nothingness as the thing which is dif-)Tj
-12.9049 -1.131 TD
.0053 Tw
[(fer)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om all other things, and so itself too\). )44.8(The positivity of meaning-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0194 Tw
(fulness is the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
5.1057 0 TD
0 Tw
(existence)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.121 0 TD
-.0194 Tw
[( of such meaning. B)17.8(y)0( contrast, the content is what it )]TJ
-8.2267 -1.14 TD
-.0246 Tw
[(is r)9.8(eferr)9.8(ed to b)5.9(y)0( the definition itself)15.9(, i.e. the object nothingness, which is a )]TJ
T*
.0597 Tw
[(self-contradictor)-17.8(y object. I)12(n)0( this case the content cannot be a consistent )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(notion. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(75)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.687 225.1118 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0125 Tw
[(35 )-183.7(As specified abo)15.8(v)5.8(e, this implication r)9.7(equir)9.8(es the standar)13.9(d semantic principle accor)13.9(d-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
.0661 Tw
(ing to which the semantic contribution of a noun is the object to which the noun )Tj
T*
.0075 Tw
[(r)9.7(efers. O)11.9(liv)5.8(er and S)23.9(miley \(2012\) hav)5.8(e pr)5.8(oposed considering the term )59.7(nothing)17.8( as an )]TJ
T*
.003 Tw
[(empty term, i.e. a noun that does not r)9.7(efer to anything. )44.8(This is sur)9.8(ely a possible way )]TJ
T*
-.046 Tw
[(of blocking the parado)5.8(x. )14.9(W)9.7(ith r)9.8(egar)13.9(d to the exposition of the aporia in 2.4, such r)9.8(es-)]TJ
T*
.0016 Tw
[(olution implies the adoption of a fr)9.8(ee logic, which would make sentence 6 not com-)]TJ
0 -1.1978 TD
-.0175 Tw
(mitted to the existence of an )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.1059 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0175 Tw
[( such that )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
3.9804 0 TD
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.6763 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F13 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.55 0 TD
-.0175 Tw
(, b\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.2685 0 TD
[(. I)11.9(n)0( fact, fr)9.8(ee logics admit quantifiers )]TJ
-18.3211 -1.131 TD
.0106 Tw
[(with no existential commitment. )44.8(This is not the place to criticiz)5.9(e this pr)5.9(oposal; her)9.8(e )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0348 Tw
[(I limit myself to noting that this would not fit w)5.8(ell with S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.7()79.7(s)0( formulation of the )]TJ
T*
.0179 Tw
[(aporia. S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino claims that the concept of nothing is self-contradictor)-17.8(y; O)11.9(liv)5.8(er and )]TJ
T*
.0458 Tw
[(S)23.9(miley)29.7()79.7(s)0( pr)5.8(oposal makes the contradiction disappear)59.7(. I)11.9(n)0( such a scenario, ev)5.8(en if the )]TJ
T*
.0038 Tw
[(notion of nothingness turns out to be consistent \(so thesis B\) is v)5.9(alid\), thesis A is no )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(longer tr)-7.8(ue. )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
96 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
99 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
10.9996 0 0 13.2 65.1748 605.2181 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(3.2.2.1 An import)12.2(an)9.3(t clarific)8.3(a)9.3(tion )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 591.4781 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.15 TD
-.0278 Tw
[(O)5.9(ur analysis has emphasiz)5.9(ed the pr)9.8(esence of an )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
18.2274 0 TD
0 Tw
(ambiguity)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.723 0 TD
-.0278 Tw
[( in the notion of )]TJ
-21.9504 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(determinate )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
4.8498 0 TD
(content)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.66 0 TD
-.0162 Tw
[( \(the null-moment\) of the concept of nothingness. E)5.9(i)0(-)]TJ
-7.5098 -1.14 TD
.0067 Tw
(ther the content is to be identified with the meaning of )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
21.5823 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.887 0 TD
.0067 Tw
[( or it is )]TJ
-25.4693 -1.14 TD
.0049 Tw
[(to be identified with the nothingness itself)15.9(. I would like to str)9.8(ess that this )]TJ
T*
.061 Tw
[(ambiguity clearly emerges fr)5.9(om a number of S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( passages. F)35.9(or in-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(stance, consider the follo)12(wing passages: )]TJ
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 482.6381 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
.0258 Tw
(nothingness is)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 154.5713 482.6381 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0253 Tw
[(; y)5.8(et not in the sense that )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 263.7302 482.6381 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.0258 Tw
[()59.6(nothingness)39.7( means be-)]TJ
-15.7878 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(ing)17.8()]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 109.6557 470.0981 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0529 Tw
[(: in this sense, nothingness is not, and being is []. )14.8(W)77.7(e)0( thus )]TJ
-1.4952 -1.14 TD
.0081 Tw
(state that )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 134.3518 457.5581 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(nothingness is, in the sense that a positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(ful-)]TJ
-3.7861 -1.14 TD
.052 Tw
[(ness a being is meaning)-5.8(ful as the absolutely negativ)5.8(e, i.e. as )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[()59.6(nothing)17.8()]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 131.8233 432.4782 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0089 Tw
[(; in other wor)13.9(ds, it is meaning)-5.8(ful as that )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 301.5309 432.4782 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.0091 Tw
[()59.6(nothing)17.8( which )]TJ
-19.2944 -1.14 TD
-.0218 Tw
[(is absolutely not meaning)-5.8(ful as being)17.8()]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 255.734 419.9382 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0214 Tw
[(. [] )44.8(The two sides or mo-)]TJ
-15.0461 -1.14 TD
.058 Tw
[(ments of this self-contradictoriness ar)9.7(e as alr)9.7(eady noted )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
23.533 0 TD
0 Tw
(being )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-23.533 -1.14 TD
.2007 Tw
[(\(positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness\) and )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 226.6823 394.8582 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.2047 Tw
[(nothing, as a non-contradictor)-17.8(y )]TJ
-12.3511 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(meaning)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 130.4587 382.3182 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.1142 Tw
[( \(pr)9.7(ecisely because nothingness-as-moment is absolutely )]TJ
-3.425 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(not meaning)-5.8(ful as being)17.8(. \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 8, pp)15.8(. 15-16\). )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 93.5372 357.2382 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
-.0383 Tw
[(Both sides or moments of the necessar)-17.8(y contradiction which con-)]TJ
T*
.1879 Tw
[(stitutes the meaning nothing ar)9.7(e meanings)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 285.5904 344.6982 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.1842 Tw
[(. B)11.9(ut )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 312.8689 344.6982 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.1879 Tw
(that nothing)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
10.78 0 0 11 368.4924 344.6982 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tw
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-25.506 -1.14 TD
-.0006 Tw
(which is the moment of this contradiction and which means )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
23.52 0 TD
0 Tw
(noth-)Tj
-23.52 -1.14 TD
(ing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.161 0 TD
-.0314 Tw
(, and not )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
3.6619 0 TD
(an existent )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
4.1033 0 TD
( i.e. that nothing which is )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.4857 0 TD
0 Tw
(not )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.4096 0 TD
(nothing )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
3.2796 0 TD
(qua )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-24.1011 -1.14 TD
-.0296 Tw
[(positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 202.2224 307.0782 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
-.0302 Tw
[(is, cer)-7.8(tainly)84.7(, meaning)-5.8(ful)]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 303.6888 307.0782 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.0296 Tc
0 Tw
( \()Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F3 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 309.514 307.0782 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tc
-.0302 Tw
[(it is, pr)9.7(ecisely)84.7(, )]TJ
-20.035 -1.14 TD
-.0265 Tw
(a meaning)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 137.4497 294.5382 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
-.026 Tw
(\); but it )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
3.1251 0 TD
0 Tw
(is )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.764 0 TD
-.026 Tw
(only such \(just as it )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
7.5722 0 TD
0 Tw
(is )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.764 0 TD
-.026 Tw
(only a side and moment )Tj
-16.2989 -1.14 TD
.1092 Tw
(of that contradiction\) in the sense that nothing, which is a mo-)Tj
T*
.139 Tw
(ment, is a moment insofar as it is )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
14.1369 0 TD
0 Tw
(distinct )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.088 0 TD
.139 Tw
[(fr)5.8(om its )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.5541 0 TD
(appearing as )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-20.779 -1.14 TD
-.0623 Tw
[(something meaning)-5.8(ful \(and hence as a side or moment\): for this )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.2941 0 TD
0 Tw
(ap-)Tj
-24.2941 -1.14 TD
(pearing-as )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.9955 0 TD
-.0205 Tw
(is the )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
2.257 0 TD
0 Tw
(other )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.0815 0 TD
-.0205 Tw
(moment of nothing )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
7.8134 0 TD
0 Tw
(qua )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
1.6345 0 TD
-.0205 Tw
[(necessar)-17.8(y contradic-)]TJ
-17.7818 -1.14 TD
-.0619 Tw
[(tion \(this other moment being the positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness of noth-)]TJ
T*
.0695 Tw
[(ing, which is meaning)-5.8(ful, y)5.8(et only as something distinct fr)5.8(om its )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(o)11.9(wn positiv)5.8(e meaning)-5.8(fulness\). \(S)11.9(ev)5.8(erino 2013, pp)15.8(. 36-37\) )]TJ
11.76 0 0 12 79.3642 193.4983 Tm
( )Tj
T*
.0078 Tw
[(The gr)9.8(een passages ar)9.8(e about the null-moment understood as a mean-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.006 Tw
[(ing \(as clearly stated b)5.9(y)0( the latter passage fr)5.9(om )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
18.0161 0 TD
[(I)11.9(ntorno al S)12(enso del N)29.8(ulla)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.6152 0 TD
0 Tw
(\). )Tj
-27.6313 -1.14 TD
-.0234 Tw
[(That )59.8(nothing)17.8( does not mean being)17.8( is naturally interpr)9.8(eted as a sentence )]TJ
T*
.1512 Tw
[(about the meanings \(i.e. the concepts\) of the wor)13.9(ds: the definition of )]TJ
T*
.1161 Tw
[()59.8(nothing)17.8( \()]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 113.8717 125.0984 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 121.5513 125.0984 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 130.2537 125.0984 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 138.3072 125.0984 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.1161 Tw
[(\)\) is differ)9.8(ent fr)5.9(om the definition of being \()]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.577 0 TD
0 Tw
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 354.8908 125.0984 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 362.9443 125.0984 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0712 Tw
(\). The )Tj
-25.7392 -1.14 TD
-.0326 Tw
[(same sentence )59.8(the nothing is not)17.8( is understood b)5.9(y)0( S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino as saying that )]TJ
T*
.0458 Tw
[(the concept of nothing is a differ)9.8(ent concept fr)5.9(om the concept of being. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(76)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
100 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
102 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0497 Tw
[(O)5.9(ne must pay attention that S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino often uses quotation mar)5.9(ks when he )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
-.0287 Tw
[(speaks of the consistent notion of nothingness, i.e. the null-moment. )44.8(This )]TJ
T*
.0645 Tw
[(clearly suggests that he is speaking of the meanings of the wor)13.9(ds being)17.8( )]TJ
T*
-.0249 Tw
[(and )59.8(nothing)17.8(. M)23.9(o)0(r)9.8(e)0(o)15.9(v)5.8(er)59.8(, the fact that )59.8(nothing)17.8( means )59.8(nothing)17.8(, and so )]TJ
T*
.059 Tw
[(nothingness cannot hav)5.8(e any semantic positivity)29.8( \(S)12(ev)5.8(erino 1958, 8, p)15.9(.)0( )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(216)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 74.3226 541.0781 Tm
(36)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 81.9664 538.0781 Tm
-.0521 Tw
(\) depends exactly on the definition of nothing \(\()Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 296.0804 538.0781 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 303.7601 538.0781 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 312.4626 538.0781 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 320.5159 538.0781 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0521 Tw
(\)\), which does )Tj
-22.8548 -1.14 TD
.1251 Tw
[(not allo)12(w any entity to be identified with it. Clearly)84.9(, when he dir)9.8(ectly )]TJ
T*
.0595 Tw
[(speaks of the )59.8(null-moment)17.8( as a consistent notion, S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino \(implicitly\) )]TJ
T*
.0319 Tw
(exploits the definition of the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
14.6887 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0319 Tw
(\) the determinate content )Tj
-18.2557 -1.14 TD
.0302 Tw
(of the notion of nothing is taken to be the same definition of such a no-)Tj
T*
0 Tw
(tion. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0001 Tc
.0048 Tw
[(B)17.9(y).1( contrast, the r)9.9(ed passages ar)9.9(e \(only a fe)-5.8(w\) examples of the self-con-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
-.0015 Tw
[(tradictor)-17.8(y notion of nothing, i.e. the concr)9.8(ete synthesis betw)5.9(een the null-)]TJ
T*
.1217 Tw
[(moment and its )59.8(positivity of meaning)-5.9(fulness)39.8(. H)17.8(e)0(r)9.8(e)0( S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino explicitly )]TJ
T*
.048 Tw
[(says that the nothingness appears, i.e. it manifests itself)15.9(. Clearly)84.9(, he does )]TJ
T*
.0137 Tw
(not mean the definition of the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
15.3178 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0137 Tw
(\), since this definition is )Tj
-18.8848 -1.14 TD
-.0411 Tw
[(per)-7.8(fectly consistent. Rather)59.8(, S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino means her)9.8(e the same \(state of)-109.8(\) noth-)]TJ
T*
-.0017 Tw
[(ingness. )14.8(What it is manifest in the notion of nothingness is the same \(ob-)]TJ
T*
.0257 Tw
[(ject\) nothingness. )44.9(The idea seems to be that w)5.9(e)0( hav)5.8(e the notion of noth-)]TJ
T*
-.042 Tw
[(ingness, and thr)5.9(ough this notion )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
12.6179 0 TD
(the nothingness)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
5.511 0 TD
[( itself appears. And in fact, )]TJ
-18.1288 -1.14 TD
-.0286 Tw
[(the concept is said to be self-contradictor)-17.8(y)84.9(.)0( )44.8(Ther)9.8(efor)9.8(e, her)9.8(e the synthesis is )]TJ
T*
.0442 Tw
[(betw)5.9(een a )59.8(positivity of meaning)-5.9(fulness)39.8( and the \(object\) nothing, which )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(thus plays the par)-7.8(t of the null-moment. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 262.3183 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(Conclusion )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F9 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 248.2783 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
0 -1.15 TD
.1187 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( formulation and r)9.8(esolution of the pr)5.9(oblem of nothingness is )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0449 Tw
[(based on a general r)9.8(eferment to the notion of nothing. I)11.9(n)0( this paper)59.8(, w)5.9(e)0( )]TJ
T*
.067 Tw
[(hav)5.8(e pr)9.8(esented thr)9.8(ee differ)9.8(ent ways in which w)5.9(e)0( may interpr)9.8(et such no-)]TJ
T*
.122 Tw
[(tion: as a quantifier)59.8(, as a noun-phrase, or as a concept \(conceiv)5.8(ed as a )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(pr)5.9(opositional function\). )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0425 Tw
[(The quantifier r)9.8(eading is the simplest and least contr)5.9(o)15.9(v)5.9(ersial; it is the )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0061 Tw
[(r)9.8(eading of nothing that ev)5.8(en an anti-metaphysician like Carnap could ac-)]TJ
T*
-.0585 Tw
[(cept. )14.9(W)77.8(e)0( hav)5.8(e insisted that such an interpr)9.8(etation does not imply any para-)]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(77)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 56.6783 97.6267 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
.0124 Tw
[(36 )-183.8(This passage has not been translated in the pr)9.8(esent contribution. As such, the trans-)]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(lation is mine \(the page number her)9.8(e r)9.8(efers to the I)23.9(talian A)11.9(delphi's edition\). )]TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
103 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
105 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 65.191 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
-.0556 Tw
[(do)5.9(x of nothing; mor)9.8(eo)15.9(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( its non-equiv)5.8(alence with the noun-phrase inter-)]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0196 Tw
[(pr)9.8(etation allo)11.9(ws us to r)9.8(eply to some positions that would like to extrapo-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
[(late the noun-phrase interpr)9.8(etation fr)5.9(om it. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0328 Tw
[(The other two r)9.8(eadings ar)9.8(e mor)9.8(e inter)9.8(esting for S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution of )]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
.1198 Tw
[(the aporia. H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.9(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( w)5.8(e)0( argued that none of them can simultaneously )]TJ
T*
.0409 Tw
[(make tr)-7.8(ue the two theses in which S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution consists. )44.9(The con-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(cept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
1.836 0 TD
(nothing\(x\))Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.887 0 TD
-.024 Tw
[( makes thesis B\) tr)-7.8(ue, but thesis A\) turns out to be false; on )]TJ
-5.723 -1.14 TD
-.0491 Tw
[(the contrar)-17.8(y)84.9(,)0( the noun-phrase r)9.8(eading makes thesis A\) tr)-7.8(ue, but then thesis )]TJ
T*
-.0365 Tw
[(B\) becomes false. )44.8(The conclusion is that none of the thr)9.8(ee possible ways of )]TJ
T*
-.0122 Tw
[(interpr)9.8(eting the general notion of nothing can sustain S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution. )]TJ
T*
.1358 Tw
[(This sho)12(ws that S)12(e)0(v)5.8(erino)49.8()79.8(s)0( solution is built on an ambiguity: when he )]TJ
T*
-.0028 Tw
[(claims that the meaning )59.8(nothing)17.8( is self-contradictor)-17.8(y \(thesis A\), he is r)9.8(e)0(-)]TJ
T*
.0985 Tw
[(ally tr)9.8(eating it as a noun that r)9.8(efers to an object that b)5.9(y)0( definition )]TJ
T*
-.0018 Tw
(should not exist; when he claims that the content of this notion is consis-)Tj
T*
.0227 Tw
(tent, he is thinking of the definition of the concept )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
20.1348 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0227 Tw
[(\). H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( )]TJ
-23.7018 -1.14 TD
.0384 Tw
[(the two r)9.8(eadings of )59.8(nothing)17.8( ar)9.8(e differ)9.8(ent and incompatible, as is clearly )]TJ
T*
-.0368 Tw
[(sho)12(wn b)5.9(y)0( the fact that the concept )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.3123 0 TD
0 Tw
(nothing)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.827 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0368 Tw
[(\) does not inv)5.8(olv)5.8(e any contra-)]TJ
-16.8793 -1.14 TD
-.0289 Tw
[(diction, while the noun-phrase )59.8(the nothingness)39.8( leads dir)9.8(ectly to parado)5.9(x. )]TJ
1.2052 -1.14 TD
.0001 Tc
.0047 Tw
[(This ambiguity is fatal for S)12(e).1(v)5.9(erino)49.9()79.9(s).1( r)9.9(esolution. O)6(nce accepted the le-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
-.0093 Tw
[(gitimacy of )59.8(nothing)17.8( as a noun-phrase, w)5.8(e)0( face the aporia of nothingness. )]TJ
T*
.2189 Tw
[(H)17.8(o)12(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( this aporia does not depend on the fact that the meaning )]TJ
T*
0 Tw
()Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 67.9546 319.1982 Tm
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 75.6344 319.1982 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 84.3368 319.1982 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 92.3903 319.1982 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
.0032 Tw
[(\) is a per)-7.8(fectly consistent notion, or that the meaning of )59.8(nothing)17.8( )]TJ
-2.7329 -1.14 TD
-.0252 Tw
[(differs fr)5.9(om the meaning of being)17.8(. )44.9(That )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 254.4762 305.5182 Tm
0 Tw
(~)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 262.1561 305.5182 Tm
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.78 0 0 11 270.8585 305.5182 Tm
(=)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 278.9118 305.5182 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
-.0252 Tw
[(\) is a per)-7.8(fectly consistent )]TJ
-18.5935 -1.14 TD
.2047 Tw
[(notion does not av)5.8(oid that the noun-phrase )59.8(nothingness)39.8( defined b)5.9(y)0( )]TJ
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 65.1881 277.4643 Tm
0 Tw
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 68.2202 277.4643 Tm
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
10.67 0 0 11 73.1091 277.4643 Tm
(.)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
11.64 0 0 12 82.0024 277.4643 Tm
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F10 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
()Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.7471 0 TD
(x)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.42 0 TD
(\))Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
11.76 0 0 12 112.8177 277.4643 Tm
0 1 0 0 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
11.76 0 0 12 115.7577 277.4643 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[(implies the being of a contradictor)-17.8(y object. )]TJ
-3.0947 -1.131 TD
-.0318 Tw
[(The general lesson that w)5.9(e)0( should learn fr)5.9(om this situation is that anal-)]TJ
-1.2052 -1.14 TD
-.0625 Tw
[(ysis and logical distinctions ar)9.8(e impor)-7.8(tant. M)11.9(any scholars in the S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erinian )]TJ
T*
-.0349 Tw
[(tradition hav)5.8(e thought that S)11.9(e)0(v)5.8(erino had pr)5.9(o)15.9(vided the conclusiv)5.9(e wor)13.9(d on )]TJ
T*
-.0044 Tw
[(the pr)5.9(oblem of nothingness; he would hav)5.8(e solv)5.8(ed once and for all one of )]TJ
T*
-.0552 Tw
[(the oldest pr)5.9(oblems in )14.9(W)77.8(estern metaphysics)]TJ
7.644 0 0 7.8 260.6133 212.1723 Tm
0 Tw
(37)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 268.257 209.1723 Tm
-.0552 Tw
[(. B)11.9(ut a bit of logic sho)12(ws that )]TJ
-17.2675 -1.14 TD
-.0054 Tw
[(his solution is only a mirage, a danger)5.9(ous seduction originated in the am-)]TJ
T*
-.0079 Tw
[(biguity of natural language. Carnap was wr)5.9(ong in thinking that the pr)5.9(ob-)]TJ
T*
-.0039 Tw
(lem of nothingness is only a )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
10.9905 0 TD
0 Tw
[(pseudo-pr)5.9(oblem)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
5.7281 0 TD
-.0039 Tw
[(; indeed, it is a r)9.8(eal metaphys-)]TJ
-16.7186 -1.14 TD
-.0388 Tw
(ical challenge)Tj
7.644 0 0 7.8 125.1113 157.4523 Tm
0 Tw
(38)Tj
11.76 0 0 12 132.7552 154.4523 Tm
-.0387 Tw
[( wor)-7.8(th taking up)15.9(. H)17.8(o)11.9(w)5.9(e)0(v)5.8(e)0(r)59.8(,)0( giv)5.8(en the deep connection that )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
0 Tw
(78)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
9.8 0 0 10 65.191 112.9196 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[(37 )-196.2(F)35.8(or instance, C)17.8(usano \(2011\) makes such kind of claims. )]TJ
T*
-.057 Tw
[(38 )-253.2(I hav)5.9(e pr)5.8(oposed what I think to be the right appr)5.8(oach to such a pr)5.8(oblem in Costantini )]TJ
1.4462 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(\(2020\).)Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
106 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
108 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
0 680.315 453.544 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 606.4781 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0038 Tw
[(\(some, if not all\) metaphysical pr)5.9(oblems hav)5.8(e with the language in which )]TJ
0 -1.14 TD
.0284 Tw
[(w)5.9(e)0( formulate and elaborate them, Carnap was right in thinking that it is )]TJ
T*
.0209 Tw
[(not possible to o)15.9(v)5.8(er)9.8(estimate the impor)-7.8(tance of logic in clarifying and de-)]TJ
T*
.0008 Tw
[(limitating such pr)5.9(oblems amid the deep fog of their natural language for-)]TJ
T*
0 Tw
(mulations. )Tj
1.2052 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
T*
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F5 1 Tf
11.9995 0 0 14.4 56.6522 508.5581 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
[(R)14.7(e)7.3(f)17.6(e)0(r)11.2(ences )]TJ
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11.76 0 0 12 56.6825 494.5181 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
11 0 0 11 56.6931 481.4381 Tm
-.0692 Tw
[(A)5.9(quinas, T)119.9(.)0( )-44.9(\(1965\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.6974 0 TD
-.0243 Tw
[(O)5.9(n)0( B)5.9(eing and Essence )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.2501 0 TD
0 Tw
([)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
-.0243 Tw
[(D)5.9(e)0( E)5.9(nte et Essentia)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
7.0204 0 TD
[(], trans. b)5.9(y)0( J)29.8(oseph )]TJ
-21.9994 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(Bobik, N)29.8(otr)9.8(e D)5.9(ame, IN: U)35.9(niv)5.9(ersity of N)29.8(otr)9.8(e D)5.9(ame P)29.8(r)9.8(ess.)]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.3329 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-23.6213 -1.14 TD
.0201 Tw
[(B)5.9(e)0(r)-7.8(to, F)139.9(.)0( \(2009\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.7263 0 TD
[(L)129.9(esistenza non logica. D)5.9(al quadrato r)5.9(otondo ai mondi impos-)]TJ
-5.4378 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(sibili. )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.308 0 TD
[(R)12(oma-B)12(ari: Later)-5.9(za. )]TJ
-3.5965 -1.14 TD
.0342 Tw
[(Carnap)15.9(, R. \(1932\). ber)-17.8(windung der M)23.9(etaphysik dur)5.9(ch logische Analyse der )]TJ
1.2885 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(S)23.9(prache. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
3.7122 0 TD
[(E)5.9(r)5.9(kenntnis)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.0163 0 TD
(,)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.25 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.4431 0 TD
.1931 Tw
[(2, 219-241; E)5.9(nglish translation in A.J. Ay)5.9(er \(E)5.9(d.\) )]TJ
-8.4216 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(\(1966\), )Tj
/F2 1 Tf
3.14 0 TD
[(Logical P)54(ositivism )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
6.841 0 TD
[(\(pp)15.9(. 6081\). N)29.8(e)-5.9(w )14.9(Y)94(o)0(r)5.9(k: )44.9(The F)35.9(r)9.8(ee P)29.8(r)9.8(ess. )]TJ
-11.2695 -1.14 TD
.0064 Tw
[(Casati, F)139.9(.)0( & F)23.9(ujikawa, N. \(2015\). B)5.9(etter )44.9(Than Z)12(ilch? )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
20.839 0 TD
[(Logic and Logical P)5.9(hilos-)]TJ
-19.5505 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(ophy)85(.)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
1.86 0 TD
[( DOI: 10.12775/LLP)179.9(.2015.004. )]TJ
-3.1485 -1.14 TD
.0032 Tw
[(Casati, F)139.9(.)0( & F)23.9(ujikawa, N. \(2019\). N)29.8(othingness, M)23.9(einongianism and I)12(nconsis-)]TJ
1.2885 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(tent M)23.9(e)0(r)9.8(eology)85(. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.3054 0 TD
[(S)12(ynthese)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
3.039 0 TD
(, 196: 37393772. )Tj
10.45 0 0 11 56.6962 343.4982 Tm
-.0143 Tw
[(Costantini, F)139.7(.)0( \(2020\). E)5.9(xtending E)29.7(v)5.9(er)-17.8(ything with N)29.8(oth )235.7(ing. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.9925 0 TD
0 Tw
[(P)5.9(hilosophia,)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.5141 0 TD
-.0143 Tw
[( 48:)]TJ
/F9 1 Tf
1.4857 0 TD
0 Tw
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.2451 0 TD
(1413)Tj
-27.881 -1.14 TD
(1436. )Tj
11 0 0 11 96.9914 330.9582 Tm
( )Tj
-3.6635 -1.14 TD
.0215 Tw
[(C)17.8(usano, N. \(2011\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.9158 0 TD
[(Capir)9.8(e S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino)15.9(. La risoluzione dell)12(apor)9.8(etica del nulla.)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
20.486 0 TD
-.012 Tc
.0335 Tw
[( Mi)-12(-)]TJ
-27.1133 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(lano-U)29.8(dine: M)12(imesis. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
[(D)12(on, M. \(2008\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.235 0 TD
[(A)12(poria del F)35.9(ondamento, )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.1551 0 TD
[(M)12(ilano-U)29.8(dine: M)12(imesis. )]TJ
-16.3902 -1.14 TD
.0402 Tw
[(H)17.8(eidegger)59.8(, M. \(1993 [1929]\). )14.9(What is M)23.9(etaphysics?, trans. b)5.9(y)0( D. F)139.9(.)0( Kr)9.8(ell. I)12(n)-.1( )]TJ
1.2885 -1.14 TD
.0748 Tw
[(Kr)9.8(ell, D.F)139.9(. \(E)5.9(d.\), )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.0168 0 TD
[(M)12(a)0(r)-7.8(tin H)17.8(eidegger: B)12(asic )14.9(W)81.8(ritings )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
12.9034 0 TD
[(\(pp)15.9(. 93-110\). London: )]TJ
-19.9202 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(R)12(outledge. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
[(O)12(liv)5.9(er)59.8(, A. & S)23.9(miley)85(, )44.9(T)119.9(.)0( \(2013\). Z)12(ilch. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
14.7607 0 TD
(Analysis)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
2.955 0 TD
(, 73: 601613. )Tj
-17.7157 -1.14 TD
.0174 Tw
[(P)42(agani, P)179.9(.)0( \(2014\). N)29.8(ote sulle modalit dell)12(esser)9.8(e. I)12(n)0( S)23.9(panio, D., )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
25.0974 0 TD
[(I)5.9(l)0( destino del-)]TJ
-23.8089 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(l)12(esser)9.8(e. D)12(ialogo con E)5.9(manuele S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino)15.9(. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
14.9688 0 TD
[(B)12(r)9.8(escia: M)23.9(o)0(r)5.9(celliana. )]TJ
-16.2572 -1.14 TD
.1323 Tw
[(P)29.8(riest, G. \(2014\). M)35.9(uch A)12(do A)12(bout N)29.8(othing. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
18.812 0 TD
[(A)17.8(ustralasian J)29.8(ournal of Logic)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
11.0884 0 TD
0 Tw
(, )Tj
-28.6119 -1.14 TD
(11\(2\): 146158. )Tj
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
[(P)29.8(riest, G. \(2018\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
7.0212 0 TD
[(E)29.8(v)5.9(er)-17.8(ything and N)29.8(othing)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.9014 0 TD
[(. M)12(anuscript. )]TJ
-15.9226 -1.14 TD
.0906 Tw
[(Q)5.9(uine, )14.9(W)119.9(.)0(V)119.9(.O. \(1948\). O)5.9(n)0( )14.9(What )45(Ther)9.8(e I)17.8(s. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
17.5521 0 TD
[(The R)12(evie)-5.9(w of M)23.9(etaphysics)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
10.1176 0 TD
(, 2\(5\): )Tj
-26.3813 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
(2138. )Tj
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
[(R)12(ussell, B. \(1905\). O)5.9(n)0( D)5.9(enoting. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
13.2063 0 TD
[(M)12(ind)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
2.115 0 TD
(,)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.25 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
.25 0 TD
(14\(56\): 479493. )Tj
-15.8214 -1.14 TD
[(S)12(asso, G. \(1987\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.9 0 TD
[(Esser)9.8(e e negazione. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
7.0692 0 TD
[(N)29.8(apoli: M)23.9(orano)15.9(. )]TJ
-13.9693 -1.14 TD
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino, E. \(1980 [1958]\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.9092 0 TD
[(La S)23.9(t)0(r)-7.8(uttura O)5.9(riginaria. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.426 0 TD
[(M)12(ilano: A)12(delphi. )]TJ
-20.3352 -1.14 TD
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino, E. \(2009\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
8.0192 0 TD
[(D)12(iscussioni intorno al senso della v)5.9(erit. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
14.8912 0 TD
[(P)12(isa: ET)12(S. )]TJ
-22.9104 -1.14 TD
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino, E. \(2013\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
8.0192 0 TD
[(I)12(ntorno al S)12(enso del N)29.8(ulla. )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
10.1393 0 TD
[(M)12(ilano: A)12(delphi.)]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
6.6111 0 TD
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 412.8322 44.1065 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(79)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 343.8449 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 388.3357 38.8762 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
9 0 0 15 389.8279 38.8762 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 278.1729 41.6662 Tm
[(Filippo Cos)11.2(t)9.8(a)0(n)9.3(ni )]TJ
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
7.439 0 TD
()Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.498 0 TD
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 341.845 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
7.8 0 0 13 343.735 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
/F8 1 Tf
9 0 0 15 345.4984 41.6662 Tm
( )Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
109 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
111 0 obj
<>stream
q
1 i
.000031 680.315 453.543 -680.315 re
226.8 340.2 m
W n
0 680.28 453.6 -680.28 re
W n
/GS3 gs
BT
/F1 1 Tf
11 0 0 11 65.1968 607.1981 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
0 Tc
.0989 Tw
[(S)12(e)0(v)5.9(erino, E. \(2016 [1982]\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
11.3047 0 TD
[(The Essence of N)23.9(ihilism )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
9.3996 0 TD
0 Tw
([)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.32 0 TD
.0989 Tw
[(Essenza del N)23.9(ichilismo)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
8.5558 0 TD
0 Tw
(].)Tj
/F2 1 Tf
.57 0 TD
( )Tj
/F1 1 Tf
-28.8616 -1.14 TD
-.0149 Tw
[(London: V)99.9(erso)15.9(. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(Sgarav)5.9(atti, D. & S)23.9(polaor)9.8(e, G. \(2018\). O)5.9(ut of N)29.8(othing. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
21.4978 0 TD
(Thought)Tj
/F1 1 Tf
3.152 0 TD
(, 7: 132138. )Tj
-24.6498 -1.14 TD
.02 Tc
.321 Tw
[(S)12(imionato, M. \(2017\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
10.4411 0 TD
[(The )14.8(V)9.8(indication of N)29.8(othingness)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
13.2206 0 TD
[(. N)29.8(eunkir)5.9(chen-)]TJ
-22.3733 -1.14 TD
0 Tc
0 Tw
[(S)12(eelscheid: E)5.9(ditiones Scholasticae. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
-.0374 Tw
[(U)17.8(zquiano, G. \(2020\). Q)5.9(uantifiers and Q)5.9(uantification. I)12(n)0( )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
22.0626 0 TD
[(The S)23.9(tanfor)13.9(d E)5.9(ncy)12(clo-)]TJ
-20.7741 -1.14 TD
-.0036 Tw
[(pedia of P)5.9(hilosophy )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
7.3045 0 TD
[(\(S)23.9(ummer 2020 E)5.9(dition\), E)5.9(dwar)13.9(d N. Z)5.9(alta \(ed.\), URL = )]TJ
-7.3045 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
[(V)9.8(isentin, M. \(2011\). )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
8.3082 0 TD
[(I)5.9(l)0( neoparmenidismo italiano, )]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
10.9511 0 TD
[(v)5.9(ol. 2. N)29.8(apoli: B)12(ibliopolis. )]TJ
-19.2594 -1.14 TD
.0583 Tw
[(V)99.9(oltolini, A. \(2015\). H)17.8(eidegger)19.8()79.8(s)0( Logico-S)12(emantic S)23.9(trikeback. )]TJ
/F2 1 Tf
24.4514 0 TD
[(O)5.9(rganon F)]TJ
/F1 1 Tf
4.1404 0 TD
(, 22 )Tj
-27.3034 -1.14 TD
0 Tw
[(\(S)23.9(upplementar)-17.8(y I)17.8(ssue\): 1938. )]TJ
-1.2885 -1.14 TD
( )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
15 0 0 15 25.2139 43.7202 Tm
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
(80)Tj
/F4 1 Tf
27 0 0 45 65.1941 38.7191 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(e)Tj
.788 .094 .918 .427 k
.4444 0 TD
(&)Tj
.607 0 .025 rg
.7224 0 TD
(c)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
/F6 1 Tf
6.6 0 0 11 109.685 38.7191 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( )Tj
/F5 1 Tf
8.8 0 0 11 117.3924 41.7346 Tm
[(v)9.3(olume )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 146.6672 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(3)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 151.1273 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
( issue )Tj
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 179.8131 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(4)Tj
ET
/GS3 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 184.2733 41.7346 Tm
0 0 0 1 k
[( Apr)87.9(. )]TJ
ET
/GS2 gs
BT
8.8 0 0 11 209.3842 41.7346 Tm
.607 0 .025 rg
(2021)Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
112 0 obj
<>/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
113 0 obj
<>
endobj
114 0 obj
<>
endobj
115 0 obj
<>
endobj
116 0 obj
<>
endobj
117 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
118 0 obj
<>
endobj
119 0 obj
<>stream
JKDOGB+TimesNewRomanPSMT :t^Q H HGLO ;Liota 2015 The Monotype Corporation. All Rights Reserved. TimesNewRomanPSMT ! lU9 T@T[2~m_^Oxf_g˓fiEZonrut+g9fyspl+P
/36+!38@t\J7Oa4:=@-257p+'9!U%Pf*pIX/,5˧Ő8qH1zE+9(9</Mt70(#48JD
endstream
endobj
120 0 obj
<>
endobj
121 0 obj
<>stream
Hbd`ab`ddTvvM-K-M,IL
!CEaiYU4Ė9ZԜT$1Жs;2I&r4ַ5JWZ0eҊGd0 $~
endstream
endobj
122 0 obj
<>
endobj
123 0 obj
<>stream
HTkPgB.DkEqE@[0Hp@H% I Q,XWE"X*.*u]uV;{l_;ΙyμϹyH#HNAkA8+3J!Lx +deS8TN??ê0qn(%5s%ݹy\~xN$[, A V.?J+ؽU_%=DϓI:_N0칽I9bQq4MN%S eJ~N
oiqǓt}dR¤+~=xrOO5Oa3F>van]NC̕3fs̚]I\_D:ϋ叹ryZ:8pU\|yG7{מ=mOb^zļyKxWx_Xo~?_p
++zʍثLBAAA+A/yq dGHښЌBآiY?K]O[x
6r7uGDj";6GEinEv~w;q qx<;n7_g'>8%Y|I#|>#UF!zNKQ-k"1]}7,҂Bane%3KeZ
Km()*<?**ԪJu4ZØx;e@skf/8X'Z;X+-6wJT#)byATc4rЫkiJk F5
gadK+tr}6jL&![tuxkNLR{`Yl- wֹhMu2*qn졺.Jj"-"GW@oBERO.A$>|iM=Ta5G@vv8Ɨc㘋tjLV|tek)͘36Pݚ0B!X6 rYc$
aK@4.`]8L8Ǖ#Zj9P!|+lf)dFEإ{{ +*XDZp96͔ciw&0e!U)5Nh{,
\.X,ס7cN/}{>۳`H>%1e^n26tedDS)]|Y}=gyYe*sR2IXIe>w{;cMc^\a>rd1e##^>0M7FWrsDy-GŧmXSn;Q$+sJTW
d.)U4}݃)I|l "`AX?oMBK}QSmmw8ῑ!QXZO"p?4uPTk4
͜~#;;[H:&*Ȱ˪0kTj9rfj\䀣?T*ejLc=r6ja:Pi 08G_r
TFK_{ȹJ>F"_
|P]Ч!G*0XZEcϬxIPJݖk]cA0g!e:WԖ+ R
Fق7ju嬱i(d1P@:_~ЛiHs
!;bȠ`!Mh5@@ܮC ,M2)`B(9 rH|cTc};XB'ȾVKDRJ-uiO>3:v(гUV#sGL4:
7GSRLn
K_3jn$X9bnrԺ:iw߹Zw{%Dil >q;8?|5&"Ҩ5xA'yq(2I92ifⅨUQ*FA8$$(7ewمݝ^Xwe(EAVDRTJ0(@m'IS}Ǽ1j$_i<k fsԋp6t^(NT!RI&}M"tsqx段BaXAǧ/δb7cWٰg!\cK^_ל;PFLI_q HS萻HmuSM'm2 [NJI؝
Ht|_GWkw_G@[u!8p9W۟6^w0_`TKtʌuVCa=F]nCn RJopp$0H)B~cϜ;xх3LB1-:n|eEddjԺ)z)rxt~cIm*|pN82kNU$]g
Bhx]43d$lz:;U.:8 Mn9ձZ~V[q8\-DKTYrI6[j[B_ϐ= t.=D$D?ܼ3=Hag/Z0t:Y/[_ƭ6$%|@7-hݶL265u
4w
"Tc:q(25kov E12a L[L(\3^GYEK#:p_-0p&;f&p}Wh߁`.tCz7rah
EI\) t u~ljOTωx|^8vpbym7|/b Zů;p7];@@+z'(G.)ȩ]nO"Kˑ夈n2OO~p"K.3%PLD|2S[My]W#TG/+Wnܲ#ܱC W^OU61hZbPQ"v 9 8*`X hJ06M 8l < `HYZ2ǠU
z %JDL2ImڰzS}hh
kfiڜ̈́&-PY|q;bիi
,.PC?3Ji\}.TCR9njO;^c]Pxk䋦34eq`NA`[I^ØZgl[n7\]f
aTmM)`!1z/e-Vv+vNi4&l:Mu-x]vRI;ʮhk&WIQ:jd6I]b%1!rnӲKV͋J0W&q9irqZr@Gb7kAQһqD >0yr:h籺AeU_yˡ#V@~,QNj&UuԠ6W[[nVr펽` /ʛc{?V}V"xz^CM6lP
c@
Q=$j~`YG^GE%Z~{Q]h,ބ9D>f!,+8pvm|;ѩvo>YT;|R}bP)hU^~:"Φd\Jd"}>%4Ȋ㵣FmQS9e*)A52qCAJ+u00+15}35MYelYSidѣm16[^MgخA ڱ"z
f8i NB*`1mYlkW=-o| 6Ғp7
!aR
'ҙ~+Y
y}nQa}(&+b52{u